Cargando…
Abstracts in high profile journals often fail to report harm
BACKGROUND: To describe how frequently harm is reported in the abstract of high impact factor medical journals. METHODS: Design and population: We carried out a blinded structured review of a random sample of 363 Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) carried out on human beings, and published in high...
Autores principales: | Bernal-Delgado, Enrique, Fisher, Elliot S |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2329663/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18371200 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-14 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Cherry-picking of evidence fails to accurately show extent of overdiagnosis: Mammographic screening harms understated
por: Woolley, Emma
Publicado: (2013) -
How often do healthy people cough?
por: Holt, Kimberley J., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Letter in response to “Cherry-picking of evidence fails to accurately show extent of overdiagnosis: Mammographic screening harms understated”
por: Lee, Warwick, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
A suspicion of antibiotic allergy in children is often incorrect
por: Mattheij, Marjolein, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
The New Journal of British Opthalmology
por: Elliot, R. H.
Publicado: (1917)