Cargando…

Different tissue reaction of oesophagus and diaphragm after mesh hiatoplasty. Results of an animal study

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic mesh-reinforcement of the hiatal region in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and paraesophageal hernia (PEH) reduces the risk of recurrence. However, there are still controversies about the technique of mesh placement, shape, structure and material. We...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Otto, Jens, Kämmer, Daniel, Jansen, Petra Lynen, Anurov, Michael, Titkova, Svetlana, Öttinger, Alexander, Rosch, Raphael, Schumpelick, Volker, Jansen, Marc
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2330020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18405386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-8-7
_version_ 1782152773889949696
author Otto, Jens
Kämmer, Daniel
Jansen, Petra Lynen
Anurov, Michael
Titkova, Svetlana
Öttinger, Alexander
Rosch, Raphael
Schumpelick, Volker
Jansen, Marc
author_facet Otto, Jens
Kämmer, Daniel
Jansen, Petra Lynen
Anurov, Michael
Titkova, Svetlana
Öttinger, Alexander
Rosch, Raphael
Schumpelick, Volker
Jansen, Marc
author_sort Otto, Jens
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic mesh-reinforcement of the hiatal region in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and paraesophageal hernia (PEH) reduces the risk of recurrence. However, there are still controversies about the technique of mesh placement, shape, structure and material. We therefore compared tissue integration and scar formation after implantation of two different polypropylene-meshes in a rabbit model. METHODS: A total of 20 female chinchilla rabbits were included in this study. Two different meshes (Polypropylene PP, Polyglecaprone 25 Composite PP-PG) were implanted on the abdominal diaphragm around the oesophagus. After 3 months the implanted meshes were excised en-bloc. Histological and morphological analyses were carried out accordingly proliferation rate, apoptosis and collagen type I/III ratio. RESULTS: Regarding proliferation rate of oesophagus PP (9.31 ± 3.4%) and PP-PG (13.26 ± 2.54%) differ in a significant (p = 0.0097) way. In the diaphragm we found a significant (p = 0.00066) difference between PP (9.43 ± 1.45%) and PP-PG (18.73 ± 5.92%) respectively. Comparing oesophagus and diaphragm we could prove a significant difference within PP-PG-group (p = 0.0195). Within PP-group the difference reached no statistical significance (p = 0.88). We found analogous results regarding apoptosis. Furthermore, there is a significant (p = 0.00013) difference of collagen type I/III ratio in PP-PG (12.28 ± 0.8) compared to PP (8.44 ± 1,63) in case of oesophageal tissue. Concerning diaphragm we found a significant difference (p = 0.000099) between PP-PG (8.85 ± 0.81) and PP (6.32 ± 1.07) as well. CONCLUSION: The histologic and morphologic characteristics after prosthetic enforcement of the hiatus in this animal model show a more distinct tissue integration using PP-PG compared to PP. Additionally, different wound healing and remodelling capability influence tissue integration of the mesh in diaphragm and oesophagus.
format Text
id pubmed-2330020
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23300202008-04-24 Different tissue reaction of oesophagus and diaphragm after mesh hiatoplasty. Results of an animal study Otto, Jens Kämmer, Daniel Jansen, Petra Lynen Anurov, Michael Titkova, Svetlana Öttinger, Alexander Rosch, Raphael Schumpelick, Volker Jansen, Marc BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic mesh-reinforcement of the hiatal region in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and paraesophageal hernia (PEH) reduces the risk of recurrence. However, there are still controversies about the technique of mesh placement, shape, structure and material. We therefore compared tissue integration and scar formation after implantation of two different polypropylene-meshes in a rabbit model. METHODS: A total of 20 female chinchilla rabbits were included in this study. Two different meshes (Polypropylene PP, Polyglecaprone 25 Composite PP-PG) were implanted on the abdominal diaphragm around the oesophagus. After 3 months the implanted meshes were excised en-bloc. Histological and morphological analyses were carried out accordingly proliferation rate, apoptosis and collagen type I/III ratio. RESULTS: Regarding proliferation rate of oesophagus PP (9.31 ± 3.4%) and PP-PG (13.26 ± 2.54%) differ in a significant (p = 0.0097) way. In the diaphragm we found a significant (p = 0.00066) difference between PP (9.43 ± 1.45%) and PP-PG (18.73 ± 5.92%) respectively. Comparing oesophagus and diaphragm we could prove a significant difference within PP-PG-group (p = 0.0195). Within PP-group the difference reached no statistical significance (p = 0.88). We found analogous results regarding apoptosis. Furthermore, there is a significant (p = 0.00013) difference of collagen type I/III ratio in PP-PG (12.28 ± 0.8) compared to PP (8.44 ± 1,63) in case of oesophageal tissue. Concerning diaphragm we found a significant difference (p = 0.000099) between PP-PG (8.85 ± 0.81) and PP (6.32 ± 1.07) as well. CONCLUSION: The histologic and morphologic characteristics after prosthetic enforcement of the hiatus in this animal model show a more distinct tissue integration using PP-PG compared to PP. Additionally, different wound healing and remodelling capability influence tissue integration of the mesh in diaphragm and oesophagus. BioMed Central 2008-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC2330020/ /pubmed/18405386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-8-7 Text en Copyright © 2008 Otto et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Otto, Jens
Kämmer, Daniel
Jansen, Petra Lynen
Anurov, Michael
Titkova, Svetlana
Öttinger, Alexander
Rosch, Raphael
Schumpelick, Volker
Jansen, Marc
Different tissue reaction of oesophagus and diaphragm after mesh hiatoplasty. Results of an animal study
title Different tissue reaction of oesophagus and diaphragm after mesh hiatoplasty. Results of an animal study
title_full Different tissue reaction of oesophagus and diaphragm after mesh hiatoplasty. Results of an animal study
title_fullStr Different tissue reaction of oesophagus and diaphragm after mesh hiatoplasty. Results of an animal study
title_full_unstemmed Different tissue reaction of oesophagus and diaphragm after mesh hiatoplasty. Results of an animal study
title_short Different tissue reaction of oesophagus and diaphragm after mesh hiatoplasty. Results of an animal study
title_sort different tissue reaction of oesophagus and diaphragm after mesh hiatoplasty. results of an animal study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2330020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18405386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-8-7
work_keys_str_mv AT ottojens differenttissuereactionofoesophagusanddiaphragmaftermeshhiatoplastyresultsofananimalstudy
AT kammerdaniel differenttissuereactionofoesophagusanddiaphragmaftermeshhiatoplastyresultsofananimalstudy
AT jansenpetralynen differenttissuereactionofoesophagusanddiaphragmaftermeshhiatoplastyresultsofananimalstudy
AT anurovmichael differenttissuereactionofoesophagusanddiaphragmaftermeshhiatoplastyresultsofananimalstudy
AT titkovasvetlana differenttissuereactionofoesophagusanddiaphragmaftermeshhiatoplastyresultsofananimalstudy
AT ottingeralexander differenttissuereactionofoesophagusanddiaphragmaftermeshhiatoplastyresultsofananimalstudy
AT roschraphael differenttissuereactionofoesophagusanddiaphragmaftermeshhiatoplastyresultsofananimalstudy
AT schumpelickvolker differenttissuereactionofoesophagusanddiaphragmaftermeshhiatoplastyresultsofananimalstudy
AT jansenmarc differenttissuereactionofoesophagusanddiaphragmaftermeshhiatoplastyresultsofananimalstudy