Cargando…

The L1-type cell adhesion molecule Neuroglian is necessary for maintenance of sensory axon advance in the Drosophila embryo

BACKGROUND: Cell adhesion molecules have long been implicated in the regulation of axon growth, but the precise cellular roles played by individual cell adhesion molecules and the molecular basis for their action are still not well understood. We have used the sensory system of the Drosophila embryo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martin, Veronica, Mrkusich, Eli, Steinel, Martin C, Rice, Jason, Merritt, David J, Whitington, Paul M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2346466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18397531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-8104-3-10
_version_ 1782152831121227776
author Martin, Veronica
Mrkusich, Eli
Steinel, Martin C
Rice, Jason
Merritt, David J
Whitington, Paul M
author_facet Martin, Veronica
Mrkusich, Eli
Steinel, Martin C
Rice, Jason
Merritt, David J
Whitington, Paul M
author_sort Martin, Veronica
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cell adhesion molecules have long been implicated in the regulation of axon growth, but the precise cellular roles played by individual cell adhesion molecules and the molecular basis for their action are still not well understood. We have used the sensory system of the Drosophila embryo to shed light on the mechanism by which the L1-type cell adhesion molecule Neuroglian regulates axon growth. RESULTS: We have found a highly penetrant sensory axon stalling phenotype in neuroglian mutant embryos. Axons stalled at a variety of positions along their normal trajectory, but most commonly in the periphery some distance along the peripheral nerve. All lateral and dorsal cluster sensory neurons examined, except for the dorsal cluster neuron dbd, showed stalling. Sensory axons were never seen to project along inappropriate pathways in neuroglian mutants and stalled axons showed normal patterns of fasciculation within nerves. The growth cones of stalled axons possessed a simple morphology, similar to their appearance in wild-type embryos when advancing along nerves. Driving expression of the wild-type form of Neuroglian in sensory neurons alone rescued the neuroglian mutant phenotype of both pioneering and follower neurons. A partial rescue was achieved by expressing the Neuroglian extracellular domain. Over/mis-expression of Neuroglian in all neurons, oenocytes or trachea had no apparent effect on sensory axon growth. CONCLUSION: We conclude that Neuroglian is necessary to maintain axon advance along axonal substrates, but is not required for initiation of axon outgrowth, axon fasciculation or recognition of correct growth substrates. Expression of Neuroglian in sensory neurons alone is sufficient to promote axon advance and the intracellular region of the molecule is largely dispensable for this function. It is unlikely, therefore, that Nrg acts as a molecular 'clutch' to couple adhesion of F-actin within the growth cone to the extracellular substrate. Rather, we suggest that Neuroglian mediates sensory axon advance by promoting adhesion of the surface of the growth cone to its substrate. Our finding that stalling of a pioneer sensory neuron is rescued by driving Neuroglian in sensory neurons alone may suggest that Neuroglian can act in a heterophilic fashion.
format Text
id pubmed-2346466
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23464662008-04-26 The L1-type cell adhesion molecule Neuroglian is necessary for maintenance of sensory axon advance in the Drosophila embryo Martin, Veronica Mrkusich, Eli Steinel, Martin C Rice, Jason Merritt, David J Whitington, Paul M Neural Develop Research Article BACKGROUND: Cell adhesion molecules have long been implicated in the regulation of axon growth, but the precise cellular roles played by individual cell adhesion molecules and the molecular basis for their action are still not well understood. We have used the sensory system of the Drosophila embryo to shed light on the mechanism by which the L1-type cell adhesion molecule Neuroglian regulates axon growth. RESULTS: We have found a highly penetrant sensory axon stalling phenotype in neuroglian mutant embryos. Axons stalled at a variety of positions along their normal trajectory, but most commonly in the periphery some distance along the peripheral nerve. All lateral and dorsal cluster sensory neurons examined, except for the dorsal cluster neuron dbd, showed stalling. Sensory axons were never seen to project along inappropriate pathways in neuroglian mutants and stalled axons showed normal patterns of fasciculation within nerves. The growth cones of stalled axons possessed a simple morphology, similar to their appearance in wild-type embryos when advancing along nerves. Driving expression of the wild-type form of Neuroglian in sensory neurons alone rescued the neuroglian mutant phenotype of both pioneering and follower neurons. A partial rescue was achieved by expressing the Neuroglian extracellular domain. Over/mis-expression of Neuroglian in all neurons, oenocytes or trachea had no apparent effect on sensory axon growth. CONCLUSION: We conclude that Neuroglian is necessary to maintain axon advance along axonal substrates, but is not required for initiation of axon outgrowth, axon fasciculation or recognition of correct growth substrates. Expression of Neuroglian in sensory neurons alone is sufficient to promote axon advance and the intracellular region of the molecule is largely dispensable for this function. It is unlikely, therefore, that Nrg acts as a molecular 'clutch' to couple adhesion of F-actin within the growth cone to the extracellular substrate. Rather, we suggest that Neuroglian mediates sensory axon advance by promoting adhesion of the surface of the growth cone to its substrate. Our finding that stalling of a pioneer sensory neuron is rescued by driving Neuroglian in sensory neurons alone may suggest that Neuroglian can act in a heterophilic fashion. BioMed Central 2008-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC2346466/ /pubmed/18397531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-8104-3-10 Text en Copyright © 2008 Martin et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Martin, Veronica
Mrkusich, Eli
Steinel, Martin C
Rice, Jason
Merritt, David J
Whitington, Paul M
The L1-type cell adhesion molecule Neuroglian is necessary for maintenance of sensory axon advance in the Drosophila embryo
title The L1-type cell adhesion molecule Neuroglian is necessary for maintenance of sensory axon advance in the Drosophila embryo
title_full The L1-type cell adhesion molecule Neuroglian is necessary for maintenance of sensory axon advance in the Drosophila embryo
title_fullStr The L1-type cell adhesion molecule Neuroglian is necessary for maintenance of sensory axon advance in the Drosophila embryo
title_full_unstemmed The L1-type cell adhesion molecule Neuroglian is necessary for maintenance of sensory axon advance in the Drosophila embryo
title_short The L1-type cell adhesion molecule Neuroglian is necessary for maintenance of sensory axon advance in the Drosophila embryo
title_sort l1-type cell adhesion molecule neuroglian is necessary for maintenance of sensory axon advance in the drosophila embryo
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2346466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18397531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-8104-3-10
work_keys_str_mv AT martinveronica thel1typecelladhesionmoleculeneuroglianisnecessaryformaintenanceofsensoryaxonadvanceinthedrosophilaembryo
AT mrkusicheli thel1typecelladhesionmoleculeneuroglianisnecessaryformaintenanceofsensoryaxonadvanceinthedrosophilaembryo
AT steinelmartinc thel1typecelladhesionmoleculeneuroglianisnecessaryformaintenanceofsensoryaxonadvanceinthedrosophilaembryo
AT ricejason thel1typecelladhesionmoleculeneuroglianisnecessaryformaintenanceofsensoryaxonadvanceinthedrosophilaembryo
AT merrittdavidj thel1typecelladhesionmoleculeneuroglianisnecessaryformaintenanceofsensoryaxonadvanceinthedrosophilaembryo
AT whitingtonpaulm thel1typecelladhesionmoleculeneuroglianisnecessaryformaintenanceofsensoryaxonadvanceinthedrosophilaembryo
AT martinveronica l1typecelladhesionmoleculeneuroglianisnecessaryformaintenanceofsensoryaxonadvanceinthedrosophilaembryo
AT mrkusicheli l1typecelladhesionmoleculeneuroglianisnecessaryformaintenanceofsensoryaxonadvanceinthedrosophilaembryo
AT steinelmartinc l1typecelladhesionmoleculeneuroglianisnecessaryformaintenanceofsensoryaxonadvanceinthedrosophilaembryo
AT ricejason l1typecelladhesionmoleculeneuroglianisnecessaryformaintenanceofsensoryaxonadvanceinthedrosophilaembryo
AT merrittdavidj l1typecelladhesionmoleculeneuroglianisnecessaryformaintenanceofsensoryaxonadvanceinthedrosophilaembryo
AT whitingtonpaulm l1typecelladhesionmoleculeneuroglianisnecessaryformaintenanceofsensoryaxonadvanceinthedrosophilaembryo