Cargando…

The treatment and outcomes of early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: have we made any progress?

The objective of this study is to determine the progress and trends in the treatment and survival of women with early-stage (I–II) epithelial ovarian cancer. Data were obtained from the SEER database between 1988 and 2001. Kaplan–Meier and Cox regressions methods were employed for statistical analys...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chan, J K, Fuh, K, Shin, J Y, Cheung, M K, Powell, C B, Chen, L-m, Kapp, D S, Osann, K
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2359639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18349835
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604299
_version_ 1782152882317950976
author Chan, J K
Fuh, K
Shin, J Y
Cheung, M K
Powell, C B
Chen, L-m
Kapp, D S
Osann, K
author_facet Chan, J K
Fuh, K
Shin, J Y
Cheung, M K
Powell, C B
Chen, L-m
Kapp, D S
Osann, K
author_sort Chan, J K
collection PubMed
description The objective of this study is to determine the progress and trends in the treatment and survival of women with early-stage (I–II) epithelial ovarian cancer. Data were obtained from the SEER database between 1988 and 2001. Kaplan–Meier and Cox regressions methods were employed for statistical analyses. Of the 8372 patients, the median age was 57 years (range: 12–99 years). A total of 6152 patients (73.4%) presented with stage I and 2220 (26.5%) with stage II disease. Over the periods 1988–1992, 1993–1997, and 1998–2001, 3-year disease-specific survivals increased from 86.1 to 87.2 to 88.8% (P=0.076). The number of patients that underwent lymphadenectomy has increased significantly from 26.2 to 38.7 to 54.2% over the study period (P<0.001). Of those patients who underwent staging procedures with lymphadenectomy, there was no improvement in survival over the three study periods (from 93.2 to 93.5 to 93.1%; P=0.978). On multivariate analysis, younger age, nonclear cell histology, earlier stage, lower grade, surgery, and lymphadenectomy were significant independent prognostic factors for improved survival. After adjusting for surgical staging with lymphadenectomy, the year of diagnosis was no longer an important prognostic factor. In conclusion, the use of lymphadenectomy during surgery for early-stage ovarian cancer has doubled over the last 14 years. The marginal improvement in survival demonstrated over time is potentially attributed to the increased use of staging procedures with lymphadenectomy.
format Text
id pubmed-2359639
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23596392009-09-10 The treatment and outcomes of early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: have we made any progress? Chan, J K Fuh, K Shin, J Y Cheung, M K Powell, C B Chen, L-m Kapp, D S Osann, K Br J Cancer Clinical Study The objective of this study is to determine the progress and trends in the treatment and survival of women with early-stage (I–II) epithelial ovarian cancer. Data were obtained from the SEER database between 1988 and 2001. Kaplan–Meier and Cox regressions methods were employed for statistical analyses. Of the 8372 patients, the median age was 57 years (range: 12–99 years). A total of 6152 patients (73.4%) presented with stage I and 2220 (26.5%) with stage II disease. Over the periods 1988–1992, 1993–1997, and 1998–2001, 3-year disease-specific survivals increased from 86.1 to 87.2 to 88.8% (P=0.076). The number of patients that underwent lymphadenectomy has increased significantly from 26.2 to 38.7 to 54.2% over the study period (P<0.001). Of those patients who underwent staging procedures with lymphadenectomy, there was no improvement in survival over the three study periods (from 93.2 to 93.5 to 93.1%; P=0.978). On multivariate analysis, younger age, nonclear cell histology, earlier stage, lower grade, surgery, and lymphadenectomy were significant independent prognostic factors for improved survival. After adjusting for surgical staging with lymphadenectomy, the year of diagnosis was no longer an important prognostic factor. In conclusion, the use of lymphadenectomy during surgery for early-stage ovarian cancer has doubled over the last 14 years. The marginal improvement in survival demonstrated over time is potentially attributed to the increased use of staging procedures with lymphadenectomy. Nature Publishing Group 2008-04-08 2008-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC2359639/ /pubmed/18349835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604299 Text en Copyright © 2008 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Chan, J K
Fuh, K
Shin, J Y
Cheung, M K
Powell, C B
Chen, L-m
Kapp, D S
Osann, K
The treatment and outcomes of early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: have we made any progress?
title The treatment and outcomes of early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: have we made any progress?
title_full The treatment and outcomes of early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: have we made any progress?
title_fullStr The treatment and outcomes of early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: have we made any progress?
title_full_unstemmed The treatment and outcomes of early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: have we made any progress?
title_short The treatment and outcomes of early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: have we made any progress?
title_sort treatment and outcomes of early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: have we made any progress?
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2359639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18349835
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604299
work_keys_str_mv AT chanjk thetreatmentandoutcomesofearlystageepithelialovariancancerhavewemadeanyprogress
AT fuhk thetreatmentandoutcomesofearlystageepithelialovariancancerhavewemadeanyprogress
AT shinjy thetreatmentandoutcomesofearlystageepithelialovariancancerhavewemadeanyprogress
AT cheungmk thetreatmentandoutcomesofearlystageepithelialovariancancerhavewemadeanyprogress
AT powellcb thetreatmentandoutcomesofearlystageepithelialovariancancerhavewemadeanyprogress
AT chenlm thetreatmentandoutcomesofearlystageepithelialovariancancerhavewemadeanyprogress
AT kappds thetreatmentandoutcomesofearlystageepithelialovariancancerhavewemadeanyprogress
AT osannk thetreatmentandoutcomesofearlystageepithelialovariancancerhavewemadeanyprogress
AT chanjk treatmentandoutcomesofearlystageepithelialovariancancerhavewemadeanyprogress
AT fuhk treatmentandoutcomesofearlystageepithelialovariancancerhavewemadeanyprogress
AT shinjy treatmentandoutcomesofearlystageepithelialovariancancerhavewemadeanyprogress
AT cheungmk treatmentandoutcomesofearlystageepithelialovariancancerhavewemadeanyprogress
AT powellcb treatmentandoutcomesofearlystageepithelialovariancancerhavewemadeanyprogress
AT chenlm treatmentandoutcomesofearlystageepithelialovariancancerhavewemadeanyprogress
AT kappds treatmentandoutcomesofearlystageepithelialovariancancerhavewemadeanyprogress
AT osannk treatmentandoutcomesofearlystageepithelialovariancancerhavewemadeanyprogress