Cargando…

Breast cancer risk factors and a novel measure of volumetric breast density: cross-sectional study

We conducted a cross-sectional study nested within a prospective cohort of breast cancer risk factors and two novel measures of breast density volume among 590 women who had attended Glasgow University (1948–1968), replied to a postal questionnaire (2001) and attended breast screening in Scotland (1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jeffreys, M, Warren, R, Highnam, R, Davey Smith, G
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2359720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18087286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604122
_version_ 1782152900285300736
author Jeffreys, M
Warren, R
Highnam, R
Davey Smith, G
author_facet Jeffreys, M
Warren, R
Highnam, R
Davey Smith, G
author_sort Jeffreys, M
collection PubMed
description We conducted a cross-sectional study nested within a prospective cohort of breast cancer risk factors and two novel measures of breast density volume among 590 women who had attended Glasgow University (1948–1968), replied to a postal questionnaire (2001) and attended breast screening in Scotland (1989–2002). Volumetric breast density was estimated using a fully automated computer programme applied to digitised film-screen mammograms, from medio-lateral oblique mammograms at the first-screening visit. This measured the proportion of the breast volume composed of dense (non-fatty) tissue (Standard Mammogram Form (SMF)%) and the absolute volume of this tissue (SMF volume, cm(3)). Median age at first screening was 54.1 years (range: 40.0–71.5), median SMF volume 70.25 cm(3) (interquartile range: 51.0–103.0) and mean SMF% 26.3%, s.d.=8.0% (range: 12.7–58.8%). Age-adjusted logistic regression models showed a positive relationship between age at last menstrual period and SMF%, odds ratio (OR) per year later: 1.05 (95% confidence interval: 1.01–1.08, P=0.004). Number of pregnancies was inversely related to SMF volume, OR per extra pregnancy: 0.78 (0.70–0.86, P<0.001). There was a suggestion of a quadratic relationship between birthweight and SMF%, with lowest risks in women born under 2.5 and over 4 kg. Body mass index (BMI) at university (median age 19) and in 2001 (median age 62) were positively related to SMF volume, OR per extra kg m(−2) 1.21 (1.15–1.28) and 1.17 (1.09–1.26), respectively, and inversely related to SMF%, OR per extra kg m(−2) 0.83 (0.79–0.88) and 0.82 (0.76–0.88), respectively, P<0.001. Standard Mammogram Form% and absolute SMF volume are related to several, but not all, breast cancer risk factors. In particular, the positive relationship between BMI and SMF volume suggests that volume of dense breast tissue will be a useful marker in breast cancer studies.
format Text
id pubmed-2359720
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23597202009-09-10 Breast cancer risk factors and a novel measure of volumetric breast density: cross-sectional study Jeffreys, M Warren, R Highnam, R Davey Smith, G Br J Cancer Epidemiology We conducted a cross-sectional study nested within a prospective cohort of breast cancer risk factors and two novel measures of breast density volume among 590 women who had attended Glasgow University (1948–1968), replied to a postal questionnaire (2001) and attended breast screening in Scotland (1989–2002). Volumetric breast density was estimated using a fully automated computer programme applied to digitised film-screen mammograms, from medio-lateral oblique mammograms at the first-screening visit. This measured the proportion of the breast volume composed of dense (non-fatty) tissue (Standard Mammogram Form (SMF)%) and the absolute volume of this tissue (SMF volume, cm(3)). Median age at first screening was 54.1 years (range: 40.0–71.5), median SMF volume 70.25 cm(3) (interquartile range: 51.0–103.0) and mean SMF% 26.3%, s.d.=8.0% (range: 12.7–58.8%). Age-adjusted logistic regression models showed a positive relationship between age at last menstrual period and SMF%, odds ratio (OR) per year later: 1.05 (95% confidence interval: 1.01–1.08, P=0.004). Number of pregnancies was inversely related to SMF volume, OR per extra pregnancy: 0.78 (0.70–0.86, P<0.001). There was a suggestion of a quadratic relationship between birthweight and SMF%, with lowest risks in women born under 2.5 and over 4 kg. Body mass index (BMI) at university (median age 19) and in 2001 (median age 62) were positively related to SMF volume, OR per extra kg m(−2) 1.21 (1.15–1.28) and 1.17 (1.09–1.26), respectively, and inversely related to SMF%, OR per extra kg m(−2) 0.83 (0.79–0.88) and 0.82 (0.76–0.88), respectively, P<0.001. Standard Mammogram Form% and absolute SMF volume are related to several, but not all, breast cancer risk factors. In particular, the positive relationship between BMI and SMF volume suggests that volume of dense breast tissue will be a useful marker in breast cancer studies. Nature Publishing Group 2008-01-15 2007-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC2359720/ /pubmed/18087286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604122 Text en Copyright © 2008 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Jeffreys, M
Warren, R
Highnam, R
Davey Smith, G
Breast cancer risk factors and a novel measure of volumetric breast density: cross-sectional study
title Breast cancer risk factors and a novel measure of volumetric breast density: cross-sectional study
title_full Breast cancer risk factors and a novel measure of volumetric breast density: cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Breast cancer risk factors and a novel measure of volumetric breast density: cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Breast cancer risk factors and a novel measure of volumetric breast density: cross-sectional study
title_short Breast cancer risk factors and a novel measure of volumetric breast density: cross-sectional study
title_sort breast cancer risk factors and a novel measure of volumetric breast density: cross-sectional study
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2359720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18087286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604122
work_keys_str_mv AT jeffreysm breastcancerriskfactorsandanovelmeasureofvolumetricbreastdensitycrosssectionalstudy
AT warrenr breastcancerriskfactorsandanovelmeasureofvolumetricbreastdensitycrosssectionalstudy
AT highnamr breastcancerriskfactorsandanovelmeasureofvolumetricbreastdensitycrosssectionalstudy
AT daveysmithg breastcancerriskfactorsandanovelmeasureofvolumetricbreastdensitycrosssectionalstudy