Cargando…

Quantifying the effectiveness of climate change mitigation through forest plantations and carbon sequestration with an integrated land-use model

BACKGROUND: Carbon plantations are introduced in climate change policy as an option to slow the build-up of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO(2)) concentrations. Here we present a methodology to evaluate the potential effectiveness of carbon plantations. The methodology explicitly considers future long...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Minnen, Jelle G, Strengers, Bart J, Eickhout, Bas, Swart, Rob J, Leemans, Rik
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2359746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18412946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-0680-3-3
_version_ 1782152904891695104
author van Minnen, Jelle G
Strengers, Bart J
Eickhout, Bas
Swart, Rob J
Leemans, Rik
author_facet van Minnen, Jelle G
Strengers, Bart J
Eickhout, Bas
Swart, Rob J
Leemans, Rik
author_sort van Minnen, Jelle G
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Carbon plantations are introduced in climate change policy as an option to slow the build-up of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO(2)) concentrations. Here we present a methodology to evaluate the potential effectiveness of carbon plantations. The methodology explicitly considers future long-term land-use change around the world and all relevant carbon (C) fluxes, including all natural fluxes. Both issues have generally been ignored in earlier studies. RESULTS: Two different baseline scenarios up to 2100 indicate that uncertainties in future land-use change lead to a near 100% difference in estimates of carbon sequestration potentials. Moreover, social, economic and institutional barriers preventing carbon plantations in natural vegetation areas decrease the physical potential by 75–80% or more. Nevertheless, carbon plantations can still considerably contribute to slowing the increase in the atmospheric CO(2 )concentration but only in the long term. The most conservative set of assumptions lowers the increase of the atmospheric CO(2 )concentration in 2100 by a 27 ppm and compensates for 5–7% of the total energy-related CO(2 )emissions. The net sequestration up to 2020 is limited, given the short-term increased need for agricultural land in most regions and the long period needed to compensate for emissions through the establishment of the plantations. The potential is highest in the tropics, despite projections that most of the agricultural expansion will be in these regions. Plantations in high latitudes as Northern Europe and Northern Russia should only be established if the objective to sequester carbon is combined with other activities. CONCLUSION: Carbon sequestration in plantations can play an important role in mitigating the build-up of atmospheric CO(2). The actual magnitude depends on natural and management factors, social barriers, and the time frame considered. In addition, there are a number of ancillary benefits for local communities and the environment. Carbon plantations are, however, particularly effective in the long term. Furthermore, plantations do not offer the ultimate solution towards stabilizing CO(2 )concentrations but should be part of a broader package of options with clear energy emission reduction measures.
format Text
id pubmed-2359746
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23597462008-05-01 Quantifying the effectiveness of climate change mitigation through forest plantations and carbon sequestration with an integrated land-use model van Minnen, Jelle G Strengers, Bart J Eickhout, Bas Swart, Rob J Leemans, Rik Carbon Balance Manag Research BACKGROUND: Carbon plantations are introduced in climate change policy as an option to slow the build-up of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO(2)) concentrations. Here we present a methodology to evaluate the potential effectiveness of carbon plantations. The methodology explicitly considers future long-term land-use change around the world and all relevant carbon (C) fluxes, including all natural fluxes. Both issues have generally been ignored in earlier studies. RESULTS: Two different baseline scenarios up to 2100 indicate that uncertainties in future land-use change lead to a near 100% difference in estimates of carbon sequestration potentials. Moreover, social, economic and institutional barriers preventing carbon plantations in natural vegetation areas decrease the physical potential by 75–80% or more. Nevertheless, carbon plantations can still considerably contribute to slowing the increase in the atmospheric CO(2 )concentration but only in the long term. The most conservative set of assumptions lowers the increase of the atmospheric CO(2 )concentration in 2100 by a 27 ppm and compensates for 5–7% of the total energy-related CO(2 )emissions. The net sequestration up to 2020 is limited, given the short-term increased need for agricultural land in most regions and the long period needed to compensate for emissions through the establishment of the plantations. The potential is highest in the tropics, despite projections that most of the agricultural expansion will be in these regions. Plantations in high latitudes as Northern Europe and Northern Russia should only be established if the objective to sequester carbon is combined with other activities. CONCLUSION: Carbon sequestration in plantations can play an important role in mitigating the build-up of atmospheric CO(2). The actual magnitude depends on natural and management factors, social barriers, and the time frame considered. In addition, there are a number of ancillary benefits for local communities and the environment. Carbon plantations are, however, particularly effective in the long term. Furthermore, plantations do not offer the ultimate solution towards stabilizing CO(2 )concentrations but should be part of a broader package of options with clear energy emission reduction measures. BioMed Central 2008-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC2359746/ /pubmed/18412946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-0680-3-3 Text en Copyright © 2008 van Minnen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
van Minnen, Jelle G
Strengers, Bart J
Eickhout, Bas
Swart, Rob J
Leemans, Rik
Quantifying the effectiveness of climate change mitigation through forest plantations and carbon sequestration with an integrated land-use model
title Quantifying the effectiveness of climate change mitigation through forest plantations and carbon sequestration with an integrated land-use model
title_full Quantifying the effectiveness of climate change mitigation through forest plantations and carbon sequestration with an integrated land-use model
title_fullStr Quantifying the effectiveness of climate change mitigation through forest plantations and carbon sequestration with an integrated land-use model
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying the effectiveness of climate change mitigation through forest plantations and carbon sequestration with an integrated land-use model
title_short Quantifying the effectiveness of climate change mitigation through forest plantations and carbon sequestration with an integrated land-use model
title_sort quantifying the effectiveness of climate change mitigation through forest plantations and carbon sequestration with an integrated land-use model
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2359746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18412946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-0680-3-3
work_keys_str_mv AT vanminnenjelleg quantifyingtheeffectivenessofclimatechangemitigationthroughforestplantationsandcarbonsequestrationwithanintegratedlandusemodel
AT strengersbartj quantifyingtheeffectivenessofclimatechangemitigationthroughforestplantationsandcarbonsequestrationwithanintegratedlandusemodel
AT eickhoutbas quantifyingtheeffectivenessofclimatechangemitigationthroughforestplantationsandcarbonsequestrationwithanintegratedlandusemodel
AT swartrobj quantifyingtheeffectivenessofclimatechangemitigationthroughforestplantationsandcarbonsequestrationwithanintegratedlandusemodel
AT leemansrik quantifyingtheeffectivenessofclimatechangemitigationthroughforestplantationsandcarbonsequestrationwithanintegratedlandusemodel