Cargando…

Eye bank issues: II. Preservation techniques: warm versus cold storage

Most of the tissue used for penetrating keratoplasty is issued through eye banks that store the corneoscleral button either in hypothermic storage at 2–6°C or in organ culture at 31–37°C. These two preservation techniques differ in technical aspects, tissue evaluation possibilities, storage time and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elisabeth, Pels, Hilde, Beele, Ilse, Claerhout
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2359829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17505780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-007-9086-1
_version_ 1782152910675640320
author Elisabeth, Pels
Hilde, Beele
Ilse, Claerhout
author_facet Elisabeth, Pels
Hilde, Beele
Ilse, Claerhout
author_sort Elisabeth, Pels
collection PubMed
description Most of the tissue used for penetrating keratoplasty is issued through eye banks that store the corneoscleral button either in hypothermic storage at 2–6°C or in organ culture at 31–37°C. These two preservation techniques differ in technical aspects, tissue evaluation possibilities, storage time and microbiological safety. Hypothermic storage is simple and requires little expensive equipment. In general a pre-storage evaluation of the endothelium is performed by specular microscopy and storage time is usually around 7–10 days. Organ culture is a relatively complicated technique requiring more expertise and well-equipped facilities. Evaluation of the endothelium is not only performed before storage, but is routinely performed after storage through the use of light microscopy. With organ culture the allowed storage period is longer, up to four weeks. The vulnerability of organ culture to microbial contamination can be turned into an advantage because it allows the detection of residual micro-organisms on the cornea before surgery. Both preservation techniques seem to result in similar graft survival. The method of choice for preservation of the donor cornea is dictated by a number of factors mentioned in this review and this helps to explain the geographical differences in the use of the different techniques.
format Text
id pubmed-2359829
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23598292008-05-01 Eye bank issues: II. Preservation techniques: warm versus cold storage Elisabeth, Pels Hilde, Beele Ilse, Claerhout Int Ophthalmol Original Paper Most of the tissue used for penetrating keratoplasty is issued through eye banks that store the corneoscleral button either in hypothermic storage at 2–6°C or in organ culture at 31–37°C. These two preservation techniques differ in technical aspects, tissue evaluation possibilities, storage time and microbiological safety. Hypothermic storage is simple and requires little expensive equipment. In general a pre-storage evaluation of the endothelium is performed by specular microscopy and storage time is usually around 7–10 days. Organ culture is a relatively complicated technique requiring more expertise and well-equipped facilities. Evaluation of the endothelium is not only performed before storage, but is routinely performed after storage through the use of light microscopy. With organ culture the allowed storage period is longer, up to four weeks. The vulnerability of organ culture to microbial contamination can be turned into an advantage because it allows the detection of residual micro-organisms on the cornea before surgery. Both preservation techniques seem to result in similar graft survival. The method of choice for preservation of the donor cornea is dictated by a number of factors mentioned in this review and this helps to explain the geographical differences in the use of the different techniques. Springer Netherlands 2007-05-16 2008-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2359829/ /pubmed/17505780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-007-9086-1 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007
spellingShingle Original Paper
Elisabeth, Pels
Hilde, Beele
Ilse, Claerhout
Eye bank issues: II. Preservation techniques: warm versus cold storage
title Eye bank issues: II. Preservation techniques: warm versus cold storage
title_full Eye bank issues: II. Preservation techniques: warm versus cold storage
title_fullStr Eye bank issues: II. Preservation techniques: warm versus cold storage
title_full_unstemmed Eye bank issues: II. Preservation techniques: warm versus cold storage
title_short Eye bank issues: II. Preservation techniques: warm versus cold storage
title_sort eye bank issues: ii. preservation techniques: warm versus cold storage
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2359829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17505780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-007-9086-1
work_keys_str_mv AT elisabethpels eyebankissuesiipreservationtechniqueswarmversuscoldstorage
AT hildebeele eyebankissuesiipreservationtechniqueswarmversuscoldstorage
AT ilseclaerhout eyebankissuesiipreservationtechniqueswarmversuscoldstorage