Cargando…

Number of siblings and the risk of solid tumours: a nation-wide study

We analysed the effects of number of siblings on the risk of solid tumours using the Swedish Family-Cancer Database, including population-based information on over 11 million individuals and more than 178 000 cancer patients diagnosed between 1958 and 2004. Incidence rate ratios (RRs), estimated by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Altieri, A, Hemminki, K
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2359906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17453006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603760
_version_ 1782152916830781440
author Altieri, A
Hemminki, K
author_facet Altieri, A
Hemminki, K
author_sort Altieri, A
collection PubMed
description We analysed the effects of number of siblings on the risk of solid tumours using the Swedish Family-Cancer Database, including population-based information on over 11 million individuals and more than 178 000 cancer patients diagnosed between 1958 and 2004. Incidence rate ratios (RRs), estimated by Poisson regression models, were adjusted for age, sex, birth cohort, area of residence and socioeconomic status. Having eight or more siblings vs none increased the risk of stomach cancer (RR=1.83, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.44–2.34). Anal cancer diagnosed before age 40 showed the strongest association with the total siblings (RR=3.27, 95% CI, 2.04–5.26 for five or more siblings vs none). Endometrial (RR=0.76, 95% CI, 0.70–0.82), testicular (RR=0.71, 95% CI, 0.62–0.82), skin cancer (RR=0.82, 95% CI, 0.69–0.97) and melanoma (RR=0.72, 95% CI, 0.65–0.79) showed strong decreased risks for five or more siblings vs none. Prostate cancer risk for those with five or more older siblings vs none was 1.38 (95% CI, 1.23–1.55). Having five or more younger siblings was most strongly associated with stomach cancer (RR=1.59, 95% CI, 1.29–1.95) and melanoma (RR=0.68, 95% CI, 0.59–0.79). We conclude that sibship characteristics are strong correlates of cancer risk at several sites; plausible interpretations include socioeconomic status.
format Text
id pubmed-2359906
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23599062009-09-10 Number of siblings and the risk of solid tumours: a nation-wide study Altieri, A Hemminki, K Br J Cancer Epidemiology We analysed the effects of number of siblings on the risk of solid tumours using the Swedish Family-Cancer Database, including population-based information on over 11 million individuals and more than 178 000 cancer patients diagnosed between 1958 and 2004. Incidence rate ratios (RRs), estimated by Poisson regression models, were adjusted for age, sex, birth cohort, area of residence and socioeconomic status. Having eight or more siblings vs none increased the risk of stomach cancer (RR=1.83, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.44–2.34). Anal cancer diagnosed before age 40 showed the strongest association with the total siblings (RR=3.27, 95% CI, 2.04–5.26 for five or more siblings vs none). Endometrial (RR=0.76, 95% CI, 0.70–0.82), testicular (RR=0.71, 95% CI, 0.62–0.82), skin cancer (RR=0.82, 95% CI, 0.69–0.97) and melanoma (RR=0.72, 95% CI, 0.65–0.79) showed strong decreased risks for five or more siblings vs none. Prostate cancer risk for those with five or more older siblings vs none was 1.38 (95% CI, 1.23–1.55). Having five or more younger siblings was most strongly associated with stomach cancer (RR=1.59, 95% CI, 1.29–1.95) and melanoma (RR=0.68, 95% CI, 0.59–0.79). We conclude that sibship characteristics are strong correlates of cancer risk at several sites; plausible interpretations include socioeconomic status. Nature Publishing Group 2007-06-04 2007-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2359906/ /pubmed/17453006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603760 Text en Copyright © 2007 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Altieri, A
Hemminki, K
Number of siblings and the risk of solid tumours: a nation-wide study
title Number of siblings and the risk of solid tumours: a nation-wide study
title_full Number of siblings and the risk of solid tumours: a nation-wide study
title_fullStr Number of siblings and the risk of solid tumours: a nation-wide study
title_full_unstemmed Number of siblings and the risk of solid tumours: a nation-wide study
title_short Number of siblings and the risk of solid tumours: a nation-wide study
title_sort number of siblings and the risk of solid tumours: a nation-wide study
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2359906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17453006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603760
work_keys_str_mv AT altieria numberofsiblingsandtheriskofsolidtumoursanationwidestudy
AT hemminkik numberofsiblingsandtheriskofsolidtumoursanationwidestudy