Cargando…
Predictors of ovarian reserve in young women with breast cancer
Ovarian reserve can be diminished following treatment for breast cancer. This study evaluated biochemical and biophysical parameters of ovarian reserve in these patients. Biochemical and biophysical tests of ovarian reserve were performed simultaneously in young (age 22–42 years), regularly menstrua...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2359977/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17533402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603814 |
_version_ | 1782152933575491584 |
---|---|
author | Lutchman Singh, K Muttukrishna, S Stein, R C McGarrigle, H H Patel, A Parikh, B Groome, N P Davies, M C Chatterjee, R |
author_facet | Lutchman Singh, K Muttukrishna, S Stein, R C McGarrigle, H H Patel, A Parikh, B Groome, N P Davies, M C Chatterjee, R |
author_sort | Lutchman Singh, K |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ovarian reserve can be diminished following treatment for breast cancer. This study evaluated biochemical and biophysical parameters of ovarian reserve in these patients. Biochemical and biophysical tests of ovarian reserve were performed simultaneously in young (age 22–42 years), regularly menstruating women with breast cancer (n=22) and age-matched controls (n=24). All tests were performed before (baseline) and after transient ovarian stimulation in the early follicular phase. Patients were recruited both before and after completion of chemotherapy, with some patients being followed up prospectively. Serum samples were analysed for follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinising hormone (LH), oestradiol (E(2)), inhibins A and B, and antimullerian hormone (AMH). Biophysical (ultrasound) tests included ovarian volume, antral follicle count (AFC), ovarian stromal blood flow and uterine dimensions. Significant differences were revealed (when compared with the controls) for basal FSH (11.32±1.48 vs 6.62±0.42 mIU ml(−1), P<0.001), basal AMH (0.95±0.34 vs 7.89±1.62 ng ml(−1), P<0.001) and basal inhibin B (19.24±4.56 vs 83.61±13.45 pg ml(−1), P<0.001). Following transient ovarian stimulation, there were significant differences in the increment change (Δ) for inhibin B (3.02±2.3 vs 96.82±16.38 pg ml(−1), P<0.001) and E(2) (107.8±23.95 vs 283.2±40.34 pg ml(−1), P<0.01). AFC was the only biophysical parameter that was significantly different between patients and the controls (7.80±0.85 vs 16.77±1.11, P<0.001). Basal and stimulated biochemical (serum AMH, FSH, inhibin B and E(2)) and biophysical (AFC) tests may be potential markers of ovarian reserve in young women with breast cancer. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2359977 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-23599772009-09-10 Predictors of ovarian reserve in young women with breast cancer Lutchman Singh, K Muttukrishna, S Stein, R C McGarrigle, H H Patel, A Parikh, B Groome, N P Davies, M C Chatterjee, R Br J Cancer Clinical Study Ovarian reserve can be diminished following treatment for breast cancer. This study evaluated biochemical and biophysical parameters of ovarian reserve in these patients. Biochemical and biophysical tests of ovarian reserve were performed simultaneously in young (age 22–42 years), regularly menstruating women with breast cancer (n=22) and age-matched controls (n=24). All tests were performed before (baseline) and after transient ovarian stimulation in the early follicular phase. Patients were recruited both before and after completion of chemotherapy, with some patients being followed up prospectively. Serum samples were analysed for follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinising hormone (LH), oestradiol (E(2)), inhibins A and B, and antimullerian hormone (AMH). Biophysical (ultrasound) tests included ovarian volume, antral follicle count (AFC), ovarian stromal blood flow and uterine dimensions. Significant differences were revealed (when compared with the controls) for basal FSH (11.32±1.48 vs 6.62±0.42 mIU ml(−1), P<0.001), basal AMH (0.95±0.34 vs 7.89±1.62 ng ml(−1), P<0.001) and basal inhibin B (19.24±4.56 vs 83.61±13.45 pg ml(−1), P<0.001). Following transient ovarian stimulation, there were significant differences in the increment change (Δ) for inhibin B (3.02±2.3 vs 96.82±16.38 pg ml(−1), P<0.001) and E(2) (107.8±23.95 vs 283.2±40.34 pg ml(−1), P<0.01). AFC was the only biophysical parameter that was significantly different between patients and the controls (7.80±0.85 vs 16.77±1.11, P<0.001). Basal and stimulated biochemical (serum AMH, FSH, inhibin B and E(2)) and biophysical (AFC) tests may be potential markers of ovarian reserve in young women with breast cancer. Nature Publishing Group 2007-06-18 2007-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC2359977/ /pubmed/17533402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603814 Text en Copyright © 2007 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Lutchman Singh, K Muttukrishna, S Stein, R C McGarrigle, H H Patel, A Parikh, B Groome, N P Davies, M C Chatterjee, R Predictors of ovarian reserve in young women with breast cancer |
title | Predictors of ovarian reserve in young women with breast cancer |
title_full | Predictors of ovarian reserve in young women with breast cancer |
title_fullStr | Predictors of ovarian reserve in young women with breast cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Predictors of ovarian reserve in young women with breast cancer |
title_short | Predictors of ovarian reserve in young women with breast cancer |
title_sort | predictors of ovarian reserve in young women with breast cancer |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2359977/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17533402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603814 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lutchmansinghk predictorsofovarianreserveinyoungwomenwithbreastcancer AT muttukrishnas predictorsofovarianreserveinyoungwomenwithbreastcancer AT steinrc predictorsofovarianreserveinyoungwomenwithbreastcancer AT mcgarriglehh predictorsofovarianreserveinyoungwomenwithbreastcancer AT patela predictorsofovarianreserveinyoungwomenwithbreastcancer AT parikhb predictorsofovarianreserveinyoungwomenwithbreastcancer AT groomenp predictorsofovarianreserveinyoungwomenwithbreastcancer AT daviesmc predictorsofovarianreserveinyoungwomenwithbreastcancer AT chatterjeer predictorsofovarianreserveinyoungwomenwithbreastcancer |