Cargando…
A comparison of patients with relapsed and chemo-refractory gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
The majority of women requiring chemotherapy for gestational trophoblastic disease (GTN) are cured with their initial chemotherapy treatment. However, a small percentage either become refractory to treatment, or relapse after the completion of treatment. This study investigates the characteristics a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2360082/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17299394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603608 |
_version_ | 1782152959358926848 |
---|---|
author | Powles, T Savage, P M Stebbing, J Short, D Young, A Bower, M Pappin, C Schmid, P Seckl, M J |
author_facet | Powles, T Savage, P M Stebbing, J Short, D Young, A Bower, M Pappin, C Schmid, P Seckl, M J |
author_sort | Powles, T |
collection | PubMed |
description | The majority of women requiring chemotherapy for gestational trophoblastic disease (GTN) are cured with their initial chemotherapy treatment. However, a small percentage either become refractory to treatment, or relapse after the completion of treatment. This study investigates the characteristics and outcome of these patients. Patients were identified from the Charing Cross Hospital GTD database. The outcome of these patients with relapsed disease was compared to those with refractory disease. Between 1980 and 2004, 1708 patients were treated with chemotherapy for GTN. Sixty (3.5%) patents relapsed following completion of initial therapy. The overall 5-year survival for patients with relapsed GTN was 93% (95% CI 86–100%). The overall survival for patients with low-risk and high-risk disease at presentation, who subsequently relapsed was 100% (n=35), and 84% (n=25) (95% CI: 66–96%: P<0.05), respectively. Eleven patients were identified who failed to enter remission and had refractory disease. These patients had a worse outcome compared to patients with relapsed disease (5-year survival 43% (95% CI:12–73% P<0.01)). The outcome of patients with relapsed GTN is good. However, patients with primary chemo-refractory disease do poorly and novel therapies are required for this group of patients. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2360082 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-23600822009-09-10 A comparison of patients with relapsed and chemo-refractory gestational trophoblastic neoplasia Powles, T Savage, P M Stebbing, J Short, D Young, A Bower, M Pappin, C Schmid, P Seckl, M J Br J Cancer Clinical Study The majority of women requiring chemotherapy for gestational trophoblastic disease (GTN) are cured with their initial chemotherapy treatment. However, a small percentage either become refractory to treatment, or relapse after the completion of treatment. This study investigates the characteristics and outcome of these patients. Patients were identified from the Charing Cross Hospital GTD database. The outcome of these patients with relapsed disease was compared to those with refractory disease. Between 1980 and 2004, 1708 patients were treated with chemotherapy for GTN. Sixty (3.5%) patents relapsed following completion of initial therapy. The overall 5-year survival for patients with relapsed GTN was 93% (95% CI 86–100%). The overall survival for patients with low-risk and high-risk disease at presentation, who subsequently relapsed was 100% (n=35), and 84% (n=25) (95% CI: 66–96%: P<0.05), respectively. Eleven patients were identified who failed to enter remission and had refractory disease. These patients had a worse outcome compared to patients with relapsed disease (5-year survival 43% (95% CI:12–73% P<0.01)). The outcome of patients with relapsed GTN is good. However, patients with primary chemo-refractory disease do poorly and novel therapies are required for this group of patients. Nature Publishing Group 2007-03-12 2007-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC2360082/ /pubmed/17299394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603608 Text en Copyright © 2007 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Powles, T Savage, P M Stebbing, J Short, D Young, A Bower, M Pappin, C Schmid, P Seckl, M J A comparison of patients with relapsed and chemo-refractory gestational trophoblastic neoplasia |
title | A comparison of patients with relapsed and chemo-refractory gestational trophoblastic neoplasia |
title_full | A comparison of patients with relapsed and chemo-refractory gestational trophoblastic neoplasia |
title_fullStr | A comparison of patients with relapsed and chemo-refractory gestational trophoblastic neoplasia |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of patients with relapsed and chemo-refractory gestational trophoblastic neoplasia |
title_short | A comparison of patients with relapsed and chemo-refractory gestational trophoblastic neoplasia |
title_sort | comparison of patients with relapsed and chemo-refractory gestational trophoblastic neoplasia |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2360082/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17299394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603608 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT powlest acomparisonofpatientswithrelapsedandchemorefractorygestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia AT savagepm acomparisonofpatientswithrelapsedandchemorefractorygestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia AT stebbingj acomparisonofpatientswithrelapsedandchemorefractorygestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia AT shortd acomparisonofpatientswithrelapsedandchemorefractorygestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia AT younga acomparisonofpatientswithrelapsedandchemorefractorygestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia AT bowerm acomparisonofpatientswithrelapsedandchemorefractorygestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia AT pappinc acomparisonofpatientswithrelapsedandchemorefractorygestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia AT schmidp acomparisonofpatientswithrelapsedandchemorefractorygestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia AT secklmj acomparisonofpatientswithrelapsedandchemorefractorygestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia AT powlest comparisonofpatientswithrelapsedandchemorefractorygestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia AT savagepm comparisonofpatientswithrelapsedandchemorefractorygestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia AT stebbingj comparisonofpatientswithrelapsedandchemorefractorygestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia AT shortd comparisonofpatientswithrelapsedandchemorefractorygestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia AT younga comparisonofpatientswithrelapsedandchemorefractorygestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia AT bowerm comparisonofpatientswithrelapsedandchemorefractorygestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia AT pappinc comparisonofpatientswithrelapsedandchemorefractorygestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia AT schmidp comparisonofpatientswithrelapsedandchemorefractorygestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia AT secklmj comparisonofpatientswithrelapsedandchemorefractorygestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia |