Cargando…

A comparison of patients with relapsed and chemo-refractory gestational trophoblastic neoplasia

The majority of women requiring chemotherapy for gestational trophoblastic disease (GTN) are cured with their initial chemotherapy treatment. However, a small percentage either become refractory to treatment, or relapse after the completion of treatment. This study investigates the characteristics a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Powles, T, Savage, P M, Stebbing, J, Short, D, Young, A, Bower, M, Pappin, C, Schmid, P, Seckl, M J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2360082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17299394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603608
_version_ 1782152959358926848
author Powles, T
Savage, P M
Stebbing, J
Short, D
Young, A
Bower, M
Pappin, C
Schmid, P
Seckl, M J
author_facet Powles, T
Savage, P M
Stebbing, J
Short, D
Young, A
Bower, M
Pappin, C
Schmid, P
Seckl, M J
author_sort Powles, T
collection PubMed
description The majority of women requiring chemotherapy for gestational trophoblastic disease (GTN) are cured with their initial chemotherapy treatment. However, a small percentage either become refractory to treatment, or relapse after the completion of treatment. This study investigates the characteristics and outcome of these patients. Patients were identified from the Charing Cross Hospital GTD database. The outcome of these patients with relapsed disease was compared to those with refractory disease. Between 1980 and 2004, 1708 patients were treated with chemotherapy for GTN. Sixty (3.5%) patents relapsed following completion of initial therapy. The overall 5-year survival for patients with relapsed GTN was 93% (95% CI 86–100%). The overall survival for patients with low-risk and high-risk disease at presentation, who subsequently relapsed was 100% (n=35), and 84% (n=25) (95% CI: 66–96%: P<0.05), respectively. Eleven patients were identified who failed to enter remission and had refractory disease. These patients had a worse outcome compared to patients with relapsed disease (5-year survival 43% (95% CI:12–73% P<0.01)). The outcome of patients with relapsed GTN is good. However, patients with primary chemo-refractory disease do poorly and novel therapies are required for this group of patients.
format Text
id pubmed-2360082
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23600822009-09-10 A comparison of patients with relapsed and chemo-refractory gestational trophoblastic neoplasia Powles, T Savage, P M Stebbing, J Short, D Young, A Bower, M Pappin, C Schmid, P Seckl, M J Br J Cancer Clinical Study The majority of women requiring chemotherapy for gestational trophoblastic disease (GTN) are cured with their initial chemotherapy treatment. However, a small percentage either become refractory to treatment, or relapse after the completion of treatment. This study investigates the characteristics and outcome of these patients. Patients were identified from the Charing Cross Hospital GTD database. The outcome of these patients with relapsed disease was compared to those with refractory disease. Between 1980 and 2004, 1708 patients were treated with chemotherapy for GTN. Sixty (3.5%) patents relapsed following completion of initial therapy. The overall 5-year survival for patients with relapsed GTN was 93% (95% CI 86–100%). The overall survival for patients with low-risk and high-risk disease at presentation, who subsequently relapsed was 100% (n=35), and 84% (n=25) (95% CI: 66–96%: P<0.05), respectively. Eleven patients were identified who failed to enter remission and had refractory disease. These patients had a worse outcome compared to patients with relapsed disease (5-year survival 43% (95% CI:12–73% P<0.01)). The outcome of patients with relapsed GTN is good. However, patients with primary chemo-refractory disease do poorly and novel therapies are required for this group of patients. Nature Publishing Group 2007-03-12 2007-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC2360082/ /pubmed/17299394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603608 Text en Copyright © 2007 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Powles, T
Savage, P M
Stebbing, J
Short, D
Young, A
Bower, M
Pappin, C
Schmid, P
Seckl, M J
A comparison of patients with relapsed and chemo-refractory gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
title A comparison of patients with relapsed and chemo-refractory gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
title_full A comparison of patients with relapsed and chemo-refractory gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
title_fullStr A comparison of patients with relapsed and chemo-refractory gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of patients with relapsed and chemo-refractory gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
title_short A comparison of patients with relapsed and chemo-refractory gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
title_sort comparison of patients with relapsed and chemo-refractory gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2360082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17299394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603608
work_keys_str_mv AT powlest acomparisonofpatientswithrelapsedandchemorefractorygestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia
AT savagepm acomparisonofpatientswithrelapsedandchemorefractorygestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia
AT stebbingj acomparisonofpatientswithrelapsedandchemorefractorygestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia
AT shortd acomparisonofpatientswithrelapsedandchemorefractorygestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia
AT younga acomparisonofpatientswithrelapsedandchemorefractorygestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia
AT bowerm acomparisonofpatientswithrelapsedandchemorefractorygestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia
AT pappinc acomparisonofpatientswithrelapsedandchemorefractorygestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia
AT schmidp acomparisonofpatientswithrelapsedandchemorefractorygestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia
AT secklmj acomparisonofpatientswithrelapsedandchemorefractorygestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia
AT powlest comparisonofpatientswithrelapsedandchemorefractorygestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia
AT savagepm comparisonofpatientswithrelapsedandchemorefractorygestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia
AT stebbingj comparisonofpatientswithrelapsedandchemorefractorygestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia
AT shortd comparisonofpatientswithrelapsedandchemorefractorygestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia
AT younga comparisonofpatientswithrelapsedandchemorefractorygestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia
AT bowerm comparisonofpatientswithrelapsedandchemorefractorygestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia
AT pappinc comparisonofpatientswithrelapsedandchemorefractorygestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia
AT schmidp comparisonofpatientswithrelapsedandchemorefractorygestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia
AT secklmj comparisonofpatientswithrelapsedandchemorefractorygestationaltrophoblasticneoplasia