Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness analysis of anastrozole vs tamoxifen in adjuvant therapy for early stage breast cancer in the United Kingdom: the 5-year completed treatment analysis of the ATAC (‘Arimidex’, Tamoxifen alone or in combination) trial

Results from the completed treatment analysis of the ATAC (Arimidex, Tamoxifen alone or in combination) trial indicated that anastrozole was significantly superior to tamoxifen in terms of efficacy and safety in the adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) earl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mansel, R, Locker, G, Fallowfield, L, Benedict, Á, Jones, D
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2360294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17622238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603804
_version_ 1782153013004075008
author Mansel, R
Locker, G
Fallowfield, L
Benedict, Á
Jones, D
author_facet Mansel, R
Locker, G
Fallowfield, L
Benedict, Á
Jones, D
author_sort Mansel, R
collection PubMed
description Results from the completed treatment analysis of the ATAC (Arimidex, Tamoxifen alone or in combination) trial indicated that anastrozole was significantly superior to tamoxifen in terms of efficacy and safety in the adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) early breast cancer. On the basis of these results, this study estimated the cost-effectiveness of anastrozole vs tamoxifen, from the perspective of the UK National Health Service (NHS). A Markov model was developed using the 5-year completed treatment analysis from the ATAC trial (ISRCTN18233230), as well as data obtained from published literature and expert opinion. Resource utilisation data and associated costs (2003–4 UK£) were compiled from standard sources and expert opinion. Utility scores for a number of health states were obtained from a cross-sectional study of 26 representative patients using the standard gamble technique. The utility scores were then inserted into the model to obtain cost per quality adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Costs and benefits were discounted at recommended annual rates of the UK Treasury (3.5%). Modelled for 25 years, anastrozole, relative to generic tamoxifen, was estimated to result in 0.244 QALYs gained per patient at an additional cost of £4315 per patient). The estimated incremental cost-effectiveness of anastrozole compared with tamoxifen was £17 656 per QALY gained. There was a greater than 90% probability that the cost-effectiveness of anastrozole was below £30 000 per QALY gained and of the order of 65% that it was below £20 000 per QALY gained. The results were robust to all parameters tested in sensitivity analysis. Compared with commonly accepted thresholds, anastrozole is a cost-effective alternative to generic tamoxifen in adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with HR+ early breast cancer from the UK NHS perspective.
format Text
id pubmed-2360294
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23602942009-09-10 Cost-effectiveness analysis of anastrozole vs tamoxifen in adjuvant therapy for early stage breast cancer in the United Kingdom: the 5-year completed treatment analysis of the ATAC (‘Arimidex’, Tamoxifen alone or in combination) trial Mansel, R Locker, G Fallowfield, L Benedict, Á Jones, D Br J Cancer Clinical Study Results from the completed treatment analysis of the ATAC (Arimidex, Tamoxifen alone or in combination) trial indicated that anastrozole was significantly superior to tamoxifen in terms of efficacy and safety in the adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) early breast cancer. On the basis of these results, this study estimated the cost-effectiveness of anastrozole vs tamoxifen, from the perspective of the UK National Health Service (NHS). A Markov model was developed using the 5-year completed treatment analysis from the ATAC trial (ISRCTN18233230), as well as data obtained from published literature and expert opinion. Resource utilisation data and associated costs (2003–4 UK£) were compiled from standard sources and expert opinion. Utility scores for a number of health states were obtained from a cross-sectional study of 26 representative patients using the standard gamble technique. The utility scores were then inserted into the model to obtain cost per quality adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Costs and benefits were discounted at recommended annual rates of the UK Treasury (3.5%). Modelled for 25 years, anastrozole, relative to generic tamoxifen, was estimated to result in 0.244 QALYs gained per patient at an additional cost of £4315 per patient). The estimated incremental cost-effectiveness of anastrozole compared with tamoxifen was £17 656 per QALY gained. There was a greater than 90% probability that the cost-effectiveness of anastrozole was below £30 000 per QALY gained and of the order of 65% that it was below £20 000 per QALY gained. The results were robust to all parameters tested in sensitivity analysis. Compared with commonly accepted thresholds, anastrozole is a cost-effective alternative to generic tamoxifen in adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with HR+ early breast cancer from the UK NHS perspective. Nature Publishing Group 2007-07-16 2007-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC2360294/ /pubmed/17622238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603804 Text en Copyright © 2007 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Mansel, R
Locker, G
Fallowfield, L
Benedict, Á
Jones, D
Cost-effectiveness analysis of anastrozole vs tamoxifen in adjuvant therapy for early stage breast cancer in the United Kingdom: the 5-year completed treatment analysis of the ATAC (‘Arimidex’, Tamoxifen alone or in combination) trial
title Cost-effectiveness analysis of anastrozole vs tamoxifen in adjuvant therapy for early stage breast cancer in the United Kingdom: the 5-year completed treatment analysis of the ATAC (‘Arimidex’, Tamoxifen alone or in combination) trial
title_full Cost-effectiveness analysis of anastrozole vs tamoxifen in adjuvant therapy for early stage breast cancer in the United Kingdom: the 5-year completed treatment analysis of the ATAC (‘Arimidex’, Tamoxifen alone or in combination) trial
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness analysis of anastrozole vs tamoxifen in adjuvant therapy for early stage breast cancer in the United Kingdom: the 5-year completed treatment analysis of the ATAC (‘Arimidex’, Tamoxifen alone or in combination) trial
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness analysis of anastrozole vs tamoxifen in adjuvant therapy for early stage breast cancer in the United Kingdom: the 5-year completed treatment analysis of the ATAC (‘Arimidex’, Tamoxifen alone or in combination) trial
title_short Cost-effectiveness analysis of anastrozole vs tamoxifen in adjuvant therapy for early stage breast cancer in the United Kingdom: the 5-year completed treatment analysis of the ATAC (‘Arimidex’, Tamoxifen alone or in combination) trial
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of anastrozole vs tamoxifen in adjuvant therapy for early stage breast cancer in the united kingdom: the 5-year completed treatment analysis of the atac (‘arimidex’, tamoxifen alone or in combination) trial
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2360294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17622238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603804
work_keys_str_mv AT manselr costeffectivenessanalysisofanastrozolevstamoxifeninadjuvanttherapyforearlystagebreastcancerintheunitedkingdomthe5yearcompletedtreatmentanalysisoftheatacarimidextamoxifenaloneorincombinationtrial
AT lockerg costeffectivenessanalysisofanastrozolevstamoxifeninadjuvanttherapyforearlystagebreastcancerintheunitedkingdomthe5yearcompletedtreatmentanalysisoftheatacarimidextamoxifenaloneorincombinationtrial
AT fallowfieldl costeffectivenessanalysisofanastrozolevstamoxifeninadjuvanttherapyforearlystagebreastcancerintheunitedkingdomthe5yearcompletedtreatmentanalysisoftheatacarimidextamoxifenaloneorincombinationtrial
AT benedicta costeffectivenessanalysisofanastrozolevstamoxifeninadjuvanttherapyforearlystagebreastcancerintheunitedkingdomthe5yearcompletedtreatmentanalysisoftheatacarimidextamoxifenaloneorincombinationtrial
AT jonesd costeffectivenessanalysisofanastrozolevstamoxifeninadjuvanttherapyforearlystagebreastcancerintheunitedkingdomthe5yearcompletedtreatmentanalysisoftheatacarimidextamoxifenaloneorincombinationtrial