Cargando…

Optimal indications of endocrine therapy alone as adjuvant systemic treatment of breast cancer

We examined the validity of the St Gallen algorithm for Japanese breast cancer patients and sought the optimal indications of endocrine monotherapy as adjuvant systemic treatment. According to the 2005 St Gallen algorithm, endocrine responsiveness (responsive, uncertain, or non-responsive) and recur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Horii, R, Akiyama, F, Ito, Y, Iwase, T
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2360368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17726451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603916
_version_ 1782153031366737920
author Horii, R
Akiyama, F
Ito, Y
Iwase, T
author_facet Horii, R
Akiyama, F
Ito, Y
Iwase, T
author_sort Horii, R
collection PubMed
description We examined the validity of the St Gallen algorithm for Japanese breast cancer patients and sought the optimal indications of endocrine monotherapy as adjuvant systemic treatment. According to the 2005 St Gallen algorithm, endocrine responsiveness (responsive, uncertain, or non-responsive) and recurrence risk (low, intermediate, or high) were assessed in 436 invasive breast cancer patients, who underwent surgery and adjuvant therapy of tamoxifen alone in 1982–1993. Furthermore, intermediate-risk patients were divided into three groups based on lymph node metastasis and number of risk factors as follows: Group A, negative lymph node metastasis and one risk factor; Group B, negative lymph node metastasis and two to five risk factors; and Group C, positive lymph node metastasis. Cumulative 10-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates of each type were calculated. Recurrence-free survival was as follows: endocrine responsiveness; responsive: 86.0%, uncertain: 79.5%, non-responsive: 72.4%, risk category; low: 93.3%, intermediate: 84.0%, high: 59.6%, intermediate-risk patients; Group A: 93.5%, Group B: 88.2%, and Group C: 75.0%. In conclusion, patient classification based on St Gallen algorithm appears valid in Japanese breast cancer patients. Endocrine monotherapy may be sufficient as adjuvant treatment in the intermediate-risk patients, in which only one risk factor was present without any metastatic involvement in lymph node.
format Text
id pubmed-2360368
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23603682009-09-10 Optimal indications of endocrine therapy alone as adjuvant systemic treatment of breast cancer Horii, R Akiyama, F Ito, Y Iwase, T Br J Cancer Molecular Diagnostics We examined the validity of the St Gallen algorithm for Japanese breast cancer patients and sought the optimal indications of endocrine monotherapy as adjuvant systemic treatment. According to the 2005 St Gallen algorithm, endocrine responsiveness (responsive, uncertain, or non-responsive) and recurrence risk (low, intermediate, or high) were assessed in 436 invasive breast cancer patients, who underwent surgery and adjuvant therapy of tamoxifen alone in 1982–1993. Furthermore, intermediate-risk patients were divided into three groups based on lymph node metastasis and number of risk factors as follows: Group A, negative lymph node metastasis and one risk factor; Group B, negative lymph node metastasis and two to five risk factors; and Group C, positive lymph node metastasis. Cumulative 10-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates of each type were calculated. Recurrence-free survival was as follows: endocrine responsiveness; responsive: 86.0%, uncertain: 79.5%, non-responsive: 72.4%, risk category; low: 93.3%, intermediate: 84.0%, high: 59.6%, intermediate-risk patients; Group A: 93.5%, Group B: 88.2%, and Group C: 75.0%. In conclusion, patient classification based on St Gallen algorithm appears valid in Japanese breast cancer patients. Endocrine monotherapy may be sufficient as adjuvant treatment in the intermediate-risk patients, in which only one risk factor was present without any metastatic involvement in lymph node. Nature Publishing Group 2007-08-28 2007-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC2360368/ /pubmed/17726451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603916 Text en Copyright © 2007 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Molecular Diagnostics
Horii, R
Akiyama, F
Ito, Y
Iwase, T
Optimal indications of endocrine therapy alone as adjuvant systemic treatment of breast cancer
title Optimal indications of endocrine therapy alone as adjuvant systemic treatment of breast cancer
title_full Optimal indications of endocrine therapy alone as adjuvant systemic treatment of breast cancer
title_fullStr Optimal indications of endocrine therapy alone as adjuvant systemic treatment of breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Optimal indications of endocrine therapy alone as adjuvant systemic treatment of breast cancer
title_short Optimal indications of endocrine therapy alone as adjuvant systemic treatment of breast cancer
title_sort optimal indications of endocrine therapy alone as adjuvant systemic treatment of breast cancer
topic Molecular Diagnostics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2360368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17726451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603916
work_keys_str_mv AT horiir optimalindicationsofendocrinetherapyaloneasadjuvantsystemictreatmentofbreastcancer
AT akiyamaf optimalindicationsofendocrinetherapyaloneasadjuvantsystemictreatmentofbreastcancer
AT itoy optimalindicationsofendocrinetherapyaloneasadjuvantsystemictreatmentofbreastcancer
AT iwaset optimalindicationsofendocrinetherapyaloneasadjuvantsystemictreatmentofbreastcancer