Cargando…
Benefit from preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer treatment: disease-free patients' and oncologists' preferences
Preoperative radiotherapy (PRT) in resectable rectal cancer improves local control but increases probability of faecal incontinence and sexual dysfunction. Consensus was reached in 2001 in the Netherlands on a guideline advising PRT to new patients. Purpose was to assess at what benefit oncologists...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2360393/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17848910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603954 |
_version_ | 1782153037533413376 |
---|---|
author | Pieterse, A H Stiggelbout, A M Baas-Thijssen, M C M van de Velde, C J H Marijnen, C A M |
author_facet | Pieterse, A H Stiggelbout, A M Baas-Thijssen, M C M van de Velde, C J H Marijnen, C A M |
author_sort | Pieterse, A H |
collection | PubMed |
description | Preoperative radiotherapy (PRT) in resectable rectal cancer improves local control but increases probability of faecal incontinence and sexual dysfunction. Consensus was reached in 2001 in the Netherlands on a guideline advising PRT to new patients. Purpose was to assess at what benefit oncologists and rectal cancer patients prefer PRT followed by surgery to surgery alone, and how oncologists and patients value various treatment outcomes. Sixty-six disease-free patients and 60 oncologists (surgical, radiation, medical) were interviewed. Minimally desired benefit from PRT (local control) was assessed using the Treatment Tradeoff Method. Importance of survival, local control, faecal incontinence, and sexual dysfunction in determining treatment outcome preferences was assessed using Adaptive Conjoint Analysis. The range of required benefit from PRT varied widely within participant groups. Seventeen percent of patients would choose PRT at a 0% benefit; 11% would not choose PRT for the maximum benefit of 11%. Mean minimally desired benefit excluding these two groups was 4%. For oncologists, the required benefit was 5%. Also, how strongly participants valued treatment outcomes varied widely within groups. Of the four outcomes, participants considered incontinence most often as most important. Relative treatment outcome importance differed between specialties. Patients considered sexual functioning more important than oncologists. Large differences in treatment preferences exist between individual patients and oncologists. Oncologists should adequately inform their patients about the risks and benefits of PRT, and elicit patient preferences regarding treatment outcomes. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2360393 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2007 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-23603932009-09-10 Benefit from preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer treatment: disease-free patients' and oncologists' preferences Pieterse, A H Stiggelbout, A M Baas-Thijssen, M C M van de Velde, C J H Marijnen, C A M Br J Cancer Clinical Study Preoperative radiotherapy (PRT) in resectable rectal cancer improves local control but increases probability of faecal incontinence and sexual dysfunction. Consensus was reached in 2001 in the Netherlands on a guideline advising PRT to new patients. Purpose was to assess at what benefit oncologists and rectal cancer patients prefer PRT followed by surgery to surgery alone, and how oncologists and patients value various treatment outcomes. Sixty-six disease-free patients and 60 oncologists (surgical, radiation, medical) were interviewed. Minimally desired benefit from PRT (local control) was assessed using the Treatment Tradeoff Method. Importance of survival, local control, faecal incontinence, and sexual dysfunction in determining treatment outcome preferences was assessed using Adaptive Conjoint Analysis. The range of required benefit from PRT varied widely within participant groups. Seventeen percent of patients would choose PRT at a 0% benefit; 11% would not choose PRT for the maximum benefit of 11%. Mean minimally desired benefit excluding these two groups was 4%. For oncologists, the required benefit was 5%. Also, how strongly participants valued treatment outcomes varied widely within groups. Of the four outcomes, participants considered incontinence most often as most important. Relative treatment outcome importance differed between specialties. Patients considered sexual functioning more important than oncologists. Large differences in treatment preferences exist between individual patients and oncologists. Oncologists should adequately inform their patients about the risks and benefits of PRT, and elicit patient preferences regarding treatment outcomes. Nature Publishing Group 2007-09-11 2007-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2360393/ /pubmed/17848910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603954 Text en Copyright © 2007 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Pieterse, A H Stiggelbout, A M Baas-Thijssen, M C M van de Velde, C J H Marijnen, C A M Benefit from preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer treatment: disease-free patients' and oncologists' preferences |
title | Benefit from preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer treatment: disease-free patients' and oncologists' preferences |
title_full | Benefit from preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer treatment: disease-free patients' and oncologists' preferences |
title_fullStr | Benefit from preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer treatment: disease-free patients' and oncologists' preferences |
title_full_unstemmed | Benefit from preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer treatment: disease-free patients' and oncologists' preferences |
title_short | Benefit from preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer treatment: disease-free patients' and oncologists' preferences |
title_sort | benefit from preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer treatment: disease-free patients' and oncologists' preferences |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2360393/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17848910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603954 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pieterseah benefitfrompreoperativeradiotherapyinrectalcancertreatmentdiseasefreepatientsandoncologistspreferences AT stiggelboutam benefitfrompreoperativeradiotherapyinrectalcancertreatmentdiseasefreepatientsandoncologistspreferences AT baasthijssenmcm benefitfrompreoperativeradiotherapyinrectalcancertreatmentdiseasefreepatientsandoncologistspreferences AT vandeveldecjh benefitfrompreoperativeradiotherapyinrectalcancertreatmentdiseasefreepatientsandoncologistspreferences AT marijnencam benefitfrompreoperativeradiotherapyinrectalcancertreatmentdiseasefreepatientsandoncologistspreferences |