Cargando…

Benefit from preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer treatment: disease-free patients' and oncologists' preferences

Preoperative radiotherapy (PRT) in resectable rectal cancer improves local control but increases probability of faecal incontinence and sexual dysfunction. Consensus was reached in 2001 in the Netherlands on a guideline advising PRT to new patients. Purpose was to assess at what benefit oncologists...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pieterse, A H, Stiggelbout, A M, Baas-Thijssen, M C M, van de Velde, C J H, Marijnen, C A M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2360393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17848910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603954
_version_ 1782153037533413376
author Pieterse, A H
Stiggelbout, A M
Baas-Thijssen, M C M
van de Velde, C J H
Marijnen, C A M
author_facet Pieterse, A H
Stiggelbout, A M
Baas-Thijssen, M C M
van de Velde, C J H
Marijnen, C A M
author_sort Pieterse, A H
collection PubMed
description Preoperative radiotherapy (PRT) in resectable rectal cancer improves local control but increases probability of faecal incontinence and sexual dysfunction. Consensus was reached in 2001 in the Netherlands on a guideline advising PRT to new patients. Purpose was to assess at what benefit oncologists and rectal cancer patients prefer PRT followed by surgery to surgery alone, and how oncologists and patients value various treatment outcomes. Sixty-six disease-free patients and 60 oncologists (surgical, radiation, medical) were interviewed. Minimally desired benefit from PRT (local control) was assessed using the Treatment Tradeoff Method. Importance of survival, local control, faecal incontinence, and sexual dysfunction in determining treatment outcome preferences was assessed using Adaptive Conjoint Analysis. The range of required benefit from PRT varied widely within participant groups. Seventeen percent of patients would choose PRT at a 0% benefit; 11% would not choose PRT for the maximum benefit of 11%. Mean minimally desired benefit excluding these two groups was 4%. For oncologists, the required benefit was 5%. Also, how strongly participants valued treatment outcomes varied widely within groups. Of the four outcomes, participants considered incontinence most often as most important. Relative treatment outcome importance differed between specialties. Patients considered sexual functioning more important than oncologists. Large differences in treatment preferences exist between individual patients and oncologists. Oncologists should adequately inform their patients about the risks and benefits of PRT, and elicit patient preferences regarding treatment outcomes.
format Text
id pubmed-2360393
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23603932009-09-10 Benefit from preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer treatment: disease-free patients' and oncologists' preferences Pieterse, A H Stiggelbout, A M Baas-Thijssen, M C M van de Velde, C J H Marijnen, C A M Br J Cancer Clinical Study Preoperative radiotherapy (PRT) in resectable rectal cancer improves local control but increases probability of faecal incontinence and sexual dysfunction. Consensus was reached in 2001 in the Netherlands on a guideline advising PRT to new patients. Purpose was to assess at what benefit oncologists and rectal cancer patients prefer PRT followed by surgery to surgery alone, and how oncologists and patients value various treatment outcomes. Sixty-six disease-free patients and 60 oncologists (surgical, radiation, medical) were interviewed. Minimally desired benefit from PRT (local control) was assessed using the Treatment Tradeoff Method. Importance of survival, local control, faecal incontinence, and sexual dysfunction in determining treatment outcome preferences was assessed using Adaptive Conjoint Analysis. The range of required benefit from PRT varied widely within participant groups. Seventeen percent of patients would choose PRT at a 0% benefit; 11% would not choose PRT for the maximum benefit of 11%. Mean minimally desired benefit excluding these two groups was 4%. For oncologists, the required benefit was 5%. Also, how strongly participants valued treatment outcomes varied widely within groups. Of the four outcomes, participants considered incontinence most often as most important. Relative treatment outcome importance differed between specialties. Patients considered sexual functioning more important than oncologists. Large differences in treatment preferences exist between individual patients and oncologists. Oncologists should adequately inform their patients about the risks and benefits of PRT, and elicit patient preferences regarding treatment outcomes. Nature Publishing Group 2007-09-11 2007-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2360393/ /pubmed/17848910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603954 Text en Copyright © 2007 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Pieterse, A H
Stiggelbout, A M
Baas-Thijssen, M C M
van de Velde, C J H
Marijnen, C A M
Benefit from preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer treatment: disease-free patients' and oncologists' preferences
title Benefit from preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer treatment: disease-free patients' and oncologists' preferences
title_full Benefit from preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer treatment: disease-free patients' and oncologists' preferences
title_fullStr Benefit from preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer treatment: disease-free patients' and oncologists' preferences
title_full_unstemmed Benefit from preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer treatment: disease-free patients' and oncologists' preferences
title_short Benefit from preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer treatment: disease-free patients' and oncologists' preferences
title_sort benefit from preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer treatment: disease-free patients' and oncologists' preferences
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2360393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17848910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603954
work_keys_str_mv AT pieterseah benefitfrompreoperativeradiotherapyinrectalcancertreatmentdiseasefreepatientsandoncologistspreferences
AT stiggelboutam benefitfrompreoperativeradiotherapyinrectalcancertreatmentdiseasefreepatientsandoncologistspreferences
AT baasthijssenmcm benefitfrompreoperativeradiotherapyinrectalcancertreatmentdiseasefreepatientsandoncologistspreferences
AT vandeveldecjh benefitfrompreoperativeradiotherapyinrectalcancertreatmentdiseasefreepatientsandoncologistspreferences
AT marijnencam benefitfrompreoperativeradiotherapyinrectalcancertreatmentdiseasefreepatientsandoncologistspreferences