Cargando…

Comparison of the prognostic value of selected markers of the systemic inflammatory response in patients with colorectal cancer

There is increasing evidence that the presence of a systemic inflammatory response plays an important role in predicting survival in patients with colorectal cancer. However, it is not clear what components of the systemic inflammatory response best predict survival. The aim of the present study was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leitch, E F, Chakrabarti, M, Crozier, J E M, McKee, R F, Anderson, J H, Horgan, P G, McMillan, D C
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2360467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17923866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604027
_version_ 1782153056635322368
author Leitch, E F
Chakrabarti, M
Crozier, J E M
McKee, R F
Anderson, J H
Horgan, P G
McMillan, D C
author_facet Leitch, E F
Chakrabarti, M
Crozier, J E M
McKee, R F
Anderson, J H
Horgan, P G
McMillan, D C
author_sort Leitch, E F
collection PubMed
description There is increasing evidence that the presence of a systemic inflammatory response plays an important role in predicting survival in patients with colorectal cancer. However, it is not clear what components of the systemic inflammatory response best predict survival. The aim of the present study was to compare the prognostic value of an inflammation-based prognostic score (modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (Mgps) 0=C-reactive protein <10 mg l(−1), 1=C-reactive protein >10 mg l(−1), and 2=C-reactive protein >10 mg l(−1) and albumin<35 g l(−1)) with that of components of the white cell count (neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes and platelets using standard thresholds) in patients with colorectal cancer. Two patient groups were studied: 149 patients who underwent potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer and 84 patients who had synchronous unresectable liver metastases. In those patients who underwent potentially curative resection the minimum follow-up was 36 months and 20 patients died of their cancer. On multivariate survival analysis only TNM stage (HR 3.75, 95% CI 1.54–9.17, P=0.004), monocyte count (HR 3.79, 95% CI 1.29–11.12, P=0.015) and mGPS (HR 2.21, 95% CI 1.11–4.41, P=0.024) were independently associated with cancer-specific survival. In patients with synchronous unresectable liver metastases the minimum follow-up was 6 months and 71 patients died of their cancer. On multivariate survival analysis only single liver metastasis >5 cm (HR 1.78, 95% CI 0.99–3.21, P=0.054), extra-hepatic disease (HR 2.09, 95% CI 1.05–4.17, P=0.036), chemotherapy treatment (HR 2.40, 95% CI 1.82–3.17, P<0.001) and mGPS (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.01–2.04, P=0.043) were independently associated with cancer-specific survival. In summary, markers of the systemic inflammatory response are associated with poor outcome in patients with either primary operable or synchronous unresectable colorectal cancer. An acute-phase protein-based prognostic score, the mGPS, appears to be a superior predictor of survival compared with the cellular components of the systemic inflammatory response.
format Text
id pubmed-2360467
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23604672009-09-10 Comparison of the prognostic value of selected markers of the systemic inflammatory response in patients with colorectal cancer Leitch, E F Chakrabarti, M Crozier, J E M McKee, R F Anderson, J H Horgan, P G McMillan, D C Br J Cancer Molecular Diagnostics There is increasing evidence that the presence of a systemic inflammatory response plays an important role in predicting survival in patients with colorectal cancer. However, it is not clear what components of the systemic inflammatory response best predict survival. The aim of the present study was to compare the prognostic value of an inflammation-based prognostic score (modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (Mgps) 0=C-reactive protein <10 mg l(−1), 1=C-reactive protein >10 mg l(−1), and 2=C-reactive protein >10 mg l(−1) and albumin<35 g l(−1)) with that of components of the white cell count (neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes and platelets using standard thresholds) in patients with colorectal cancer. Two patient groups were studied: 149 patients who underwent potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer and 84 patients who had synchronous unresectable liver metastases. In those patients who underwent potentially curative resection the minimum follow-up was 36 months and 20 patients died of their cancer. On multivariate survival analysis only TNM stage (HR 3.75, 95% CI 1.54–9.17, P=0.004), monocyte count (HR 3.79, 95% CI 1.29–11.12, P=0.015) and mGPS (HR 2.21, 95% CI 1.11–4.41, P=0.024) were independently associated with cancer-specific survival. In patients with synchronous unresectable liver metastases the minimum follow-up was 6 months and 71 patients died of their cancer. On multivariate survival analysis only single liver metastasis >5 cm (HR 1.78, 95% CI 0.99–3.21, P=0.054), extra-hepatic disease (HR 2.09, 95% CI 1.05–4.17, P=0.036), chemotherapy treatment (HR 2.40, 95% CI 1.82–3.17, P<0.001) and mGPS (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.01–2.04, P=0.043) were independently associated with cancer-specific survival. In summary, markers of the systemic inflammatory response are associated with poor outcome in patients with either primary operable or synchronous unresectable colorectal cancer. An acute-phase protein-based prognostic score, the mGPS, appears to be a superior predictor of survival compared with the cellular components of the systemic inflammatory response. Nature Publishing Group 2007-11-05 2007-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2360467/ /pubmed/17923866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604027 Text en Copyright © 2007 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Molecular Diagnostics
Leitch, E F
Chakrabarti, M
Crozier, J E M
McKee, R F
Anderson, J H
Horgan, P G
McMillan, D C
Comparison of the prognostic value of selected markers of the systemic inflammatory response in patients with colorectal cancer
title Comparison of the prognostic value of selected markers of the systemic inflammatory response in patients with colorectal cancer
title_full Comparison of the prognostic value of selected markers of the systemic inflammatory response in patients with colorectal cancer
title_fullStr Comparison of the prognostic value of selected markers of the systemic inflammatory response in patients with colorectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the prognostic value of selected markers of the systemic inflammatory response in patients with colorectal cancer
title_short Comparison of the prognostic value of selected markers of the systemic inflammatory response in patients with colorectal cancer
title_sort comparison of the prognostic value of selected markers of the systemic inflammatory response in patients with colorectal cancer
topic Molecular Diagnostics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2360467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17923866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604027
work_keys_str_mv AT leitchef comparisonoftheprognosticvalueofselectedmarkersofthesystemicinflammatoryresponseinpatientswithcolorectalcancer
AT chakrabartim comparisonoftheprognosticvalueofselectedmarkersofthesystemicinflammatoryresponseinpatientswithcolorectalcancer
AT crozierjem comparisonoftheprognosticvalueofselectedmarkersofthesystemicinflammatoryresponseinpatientswithcolorectalcancer
AT mckeerf comparisonoftheprognosticvalueofselectedmarkersofthesystemicinflammatoryresponseinpatientswithcolorectalcancer
AT andersonjh comparisonoftheprognosticvalueofselectedmarkersofthesystemicinflammatoryresponseinpatientswithcolorectalcancer
AT horganpg comparisonoftheprognosticvalueofselectedmarkersofthesystemicinflammatoryresponseinpatientswithcolorectalcancer
AT mcmillandc comparisonoftheprognosticvalueofselectedmarkersofthesystemicinflammatoryresponseinpatientswithcolorectalcancer