Cargando…
Health state utilities for metastatic breast cancer
The aim of the study was to obtain United Kingdom-based societal preferences for distinct stages of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and six common toxicities. Health states were developed based on literature review, iterative cycles of interviews and a focus group with clinical experts. They describe...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2360509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16967055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603326 |
_version_ | 1782153066883055616 |
---|---|
author | Lloyd, A Nafees, B Narewska, J Dewilde, S Watkins, J |
author_facet | Lloyd, A Nafees, B Narewska, J Dewilde, S Watkins, J |
author_sort | Lloyd, A |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of the study was to obtain United Kingdom-based societal preferences for distinct stages of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and six common toxicities. Health states were developed based on literature review, iterative cycles of interviews and a focus group with clinical experts. They described the burden of progressive, responding and stable disease on treatment; and also febrile neutropenia, stomatitis; diarrhoea/vomiting; fatigue; hand-foot syndrome (grade 3/4 toxicities) and hair loss. One hundred members of the general public rated them using standard gamble to determine health state utility. Data were analysed with a mixed model analysis. The study sample was a good match to the general public of England and Wales by demographics and current quality of life. Stable disease on treatment had a utility value of 0.72, with a corresponding gain of +0.07 following a treatment response and a decline by 0.27 for disease progression. Toxicities lead to declines in utility between 0.10 (diarrhoea/vomiting) and 0.15 (febrile neutropenia). This study underlines the value that society place on the avoidance of disease progression and severe side effects in MBC. This may be the largest preference study in breast cancer designed to survey a representative general public sample. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2360509 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-23605092009-09-10 Health state utilities for metastatic breast cancer Lloyd, A Nafees, B Narewska, J Dewilde, S Watkins, J Br J Cancer Clinical Study The aim of the study was to obtain United Kingdom-based societal preferences for distinct stages of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and six common toxicities. Health states were developed based on literature review, iterative cycles of interviews and a focus group with clinical experts. They described the burden of progressive, responding and stable disease on treatment; and also febrile neutropenia, stomatitis; diarrhoea/vomiting; fatigue; hand-foot syndrome (grade 3/4 toxicities) and hair loss. One hundred members of the general public rated them using standard gamble to determine health state utility. Data were analysed with a mixed model analysis. The study sample was a good match to the general public of England and Wales by demographics and current quality of life. Stable disease on treatment had a utility value of 0.72, with a corresponding gain of +0.07 following a treatment response and a decline by 0.27 for disease progression. Toxicities lead to declines in utility between 0.10 (diarrhoea/vomiting) and 0.15 (febrile neutropenia). This study underlines the value that society place on the avoidance of disease progression and severe side effects in MBC. This may be the largest preference study in breast cancer designed to survey a representative general public sample. Nature Publishing Group 2006-09-18 2006-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC2360509/ /pubmed/16967055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603326 Text en Copyright © 2006 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Lloyd, A Nafees, B Narewska, J Dewilde, S Watkins, J Health state utilities for metastatic breast cancer |
title | Health state utilities for metastatic breast cancer |
title_full | Health state utilities for metastatic breast cancer |
title_fullStr | Health state utilities for metastatic breast cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Health state utilities for metastatic breast cancer |
title_short | Health state utilities for metastatic breast cancer |
title_sort | health state utilities for metastatic breast cancer |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2360509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16967055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603326 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lloyda healthstateutilitiesformetastaticbreastcancer AT nafeesb healthstateutilitiesformetastaticbreastcancer AT narewskaj healthstateutilitiesformetastaticbreastcancer AT dewildes healthstateutilitiesformetastaticbreastcancer AT watkinsj healthstateutilitiesformetastaticbreastcancer |