Cargando…

Health state utilities for metastatic breast cancer

The aim of the study was to obtain United Kingdom-based societal preferences for distinct stages of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and six common toxicities. Health states were developed based on literature review, iterative cycles of interviews and a focus group with clinical experts. They describe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lloyd, A, Nafees, B, Narewska, J, Dewilde, S, Watkins, J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2360509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16967055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603326
_version_ 1782153066883055616
author Lloyd, A
Nafees, B
Narewska, J
Dewilde, S
Watkins, J
author_facet Lloyd, A
Nafees, B
Narewska, J
Dewilde, S
Watkins, J
author_sort Lloyd, A
collection PubMed
description The aim of the study was to obtain United Kingdom-based societal preferences for distinct stages of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and six common toxicities. Health states were developed based on literature review, iterative cycles of interviews and a focus group with clinical experts. They described the burden of progressive, responding and stable disease on treatment; and also febrile neutropenia, stomatitis; diarrhoea/vomiting; fatigue; hand-foot syndrome (grade 3/4 toxicities) and hair loss. One hundred members of the general public rated them using standard gamble to determine health state utility. Data were analysed with a mixed model analysis. The study sample was a good match to the general public of England and Wales by demographics and current quality of life. Stable disease on treatment had a utility value of 0.72, with a corresponding gain of +0.07 following a treatment response and a decline by 0.27 for disease progression. Toxicities lead to declines in utility between 0.10 (diarrhoea/vomiting) and 0.15 (febrile neutropenia). This study underlines the value that society place on the avoidance of disease progression and severe side effects in MBC. This may be the largest preference study in breast cancer designed to survey a representative general public sample.
format Text
id pubmed-2360509
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23605092009-09-10 Health state utilities for metastatic breast cancer Lloyd, A Nafees, B Narewska, J Dewilde, S Watkins, J Br J Cancer Clinical Study The aim of the study was to obtain United Kingdom-based societal preferences for distinct stages of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and six common toxicities. Health states were developed based on literature review, iterative cycles of interviews and a focus group with clinical experts. They described the burden of progressive, responding and stable disease on treatment; and also febrile neutropenia, stomatitis; diarrhoea/vomiting; fatigue; hand-foot syndrome (grade 3/4 toxicities) and hair loss. One hundred members of the general public rated them using standard gamble to determine health state utility. Data were analysed with a mixed model analysis. The study sample was a good match to the general public of England and Wales by demographics and current quality of life. Stable disease on treatment had a utility value of 0.72, with a corresponding gain of +0.07 following a treatment response and a decline by 0.27 for disease progression. Toxicities lead to declines in utility between 0.10 (diarrhoea/vomiting) and 0.15 (febrile neutropenia). This study underlines the value that society place on the avoidance of disease progression and severe side effects in MBC. This may be the largest preference study in breast cancer designed to survey a representative general public sample. Nature Publishing Group 2006-09-18 2006-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC2360509/ /pubmed/16967055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603326 Text en Copyright © 2006 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Lloyd, A
Nafees, B
Narewska, J
Dewilde, S
Watkins, J
Health state utilities for metastatic breast cancer
title Health state utilities for metastatic breast cancer
title_full Health state utilities for metastatic breast cancer
title_fullStr Health state utilities for metastatic breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Health state utilities for metastatic breast cancer
title_short Health state utilities for metastatic breast cancer
title_sort health state utilities for metastatic breast cancer
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2360509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16967055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603326
work_keys_str_mv AT lloyda healthstateutilitiesformetastaticbreastcancer
AT nafeesb healthstateutilitiesformetastaticbreastcancer
AT narewskaj healthstateutilitiesformetastaticbreastcancer
AT dewildes healthstateutilitiesformetastaticbreastcancer
AT watkinsj healthstateutilitiesformetastaticbreastcancer