Cargando…

Optimal selection for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation testing using a combination of ‘easy to apply’ probability models

To establish an efficient, reliable and easy to apply risk assessment tool to select families with breast and/or ovarian cancer patients for BRCA mutation testing, using available probability models. In a retrospective study of 263 families with breast and/or ovarian cancer patients, the utility of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bodmer, D, Ligtenberg, M J L, van der Hout, A H, Gloudemans, S, Ansink, K, Oosterwijk, J C, Hoogerbrugge, N
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2360521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16909138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603306
_version_ 1782153070078066688
author Bodmer, D
Ligtenberg, M J L
van der Hout, A H
Gloudemans, S
Ansink, K
Oosterwijk, J C
Hoogerbrugge, N
author_facet Bodmer, D
Ligtenberg, M J L
van der Hout, A H
Gloudemans, S
Ansink, K
Oosterwijk, J C
Hoogerbrugge, N
author_sort Bodmer, D
collection PubMed
description To establish an efficient, reliable and easy to apply risk assessment tool to select families with breast and/or ovarian cancer patients for BRCA mutation testing, using available probability models. In a retrospective study of 263 families with breast and/or ovarian cancer patients, the utility of the Frank (Myriad), Gilpin (family history assessment tool) and Evans (Manchester) model was analysed, to select 49 BRCA mutation-positive families. For various cutoff levels and combinations, the sensitivity and specificity were calculated and compared. The best combinations were subsequently validated in additional sets of families. Comparable sensitivity and specificity were obtained with the Gilpin and Evans models. They appeared to be complementary to the Frank model. To obtain an optimal sensitivity, five ‘additional criteria’ were introduced that are specific for the selection of small or uninformative families. The optimal selection is made by the combination ‘Frank ⩾16% or Evans2 ⩾12 or one of five additional criteria’. The efficiency of the selection of families for mutation testing of BRCA1 and BRCA2 can be optimised by using a combination of available easy to apply risk assessment models.
format Text
id pubmed-2360521
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23605212009-09-10 Optimal selection for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation testing using a combination of ‘easy to apply’ probability models Bodmer, D Ligtenberg, M J L van der Hout, A H Gloudemans, S Ansink, K Oosterwijk, J C Hoogerbrugge, N Br J Cancer Genetics and Genomics To establish an efficient, reliable and easy to apply risk assessment tool to select families with breast and/or ovarian cancer patients for BRCA mutation testing, using available probability models. In a retrospective study of 263 families with breast and/or ovarian cancer patients, the utility of the Frank (Myriad), Gilpin (family history assessment tool) and Evans (Manchester) model was analysed, to select 49 BRCA mutation-positive families. For various cutoff levels and combinations, the sensitivity and specificity were calculated and compared. The best combinations were subsequently validated in additional sets of families. Comparable sensitivity and specificity were obtained with the Gilpin and Evans models. They appeared to be complementary to the Frank model. To obtain an optimal sensitivity, five ‘additional criteria’ were introduced that are specific for the selection of small or uninformative families. The optimal selection is made by the combination ‘Frank ⩾16% or Evans2 ⩾12 or one of five additional criteria’. The efficiency of the selection of families for mutation testing of BRCA1 and BRCA2 can be optimised by using a combination of available easy to apply risk assessment models. Nature Publishing Group 2006-09-18 2006-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC2360521/ /pubmed/16909138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603306 Text en Copyright © 2006 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Genetics and Genomics
Bodmer, D
Ligtenberg, M J L
van der Hout, A H
Gloudemans, S
Ansink, K
Oosterwijk, J C
Hoogerbrugge, N
Optimal selection for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation testing using a combination of ‘easy to apply’ probability models
title Optimal selection for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation testing using a combination of ‘easy to apply’ probability models
title_full Optimal selection for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation testing using a combination of ‘easy to apply’ probability models
title_fullStr Optimal selection for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation testing using a combination of ‘easy to apply’ probability models
title_full_unstemmed Optimal selection for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation testing using a combination of ‘easy to apply’ probability models
title_short Optimal selection for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation testing using a combination of ‘easy to apply’ probability models
title_sort optimal selection for brca1 and brca2 mutation testing using a combination of ‘easy to apply’ probability models
topic Genetics and Genomics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2360521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16909138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603306
work_keys_str_mv AT bodmerd optimalselectionforbrca1andbrca2mutationtestingusingacombinationofeasytoapplyprobabilitymodels
AT ligtenbergmjl optimalselectionforbrca1andbrca2mutationtestingusingacombinationofeasytoapplyprobabilitymodels
AT vanderhoutah optimalselectionforbrca1andbrca2mutationtestingusingacombinationofeasytoapplyprobabilitymodels
AT gloudemanss optimalselectionforbrca1andbrca2mutationtestingusingacombinationofeasytoapplyprobabilitymodels
AT ansinkk optimalselectionforbrca1andbrca2mutationtestingusingacombinationofeasytoapplyprobabilitymodels
AT oosterwijkjc optimalselectionforbrca1andbrca2mutationtestingusingacombinationofeasytoapplyprobabilitymodels
AT hoogerbruggen optimalselectionforbrca1andbrca2mutationtestingusingacombinationofeasytoapplyprobabilitymodels