Cargando…
Will Rogers revisited: prospective observational study of survival of 3592 patients with colorectal cancer according to number of nodes examined by pathologists
To investigate the relationship between survival in colorectal cancer patients and the number of lymph nodes examined by a pathologist, previously attributed to stage migration, we used data from a cohort of 5174 colorectal cancer patients recruited between September 1991 and August 1994, and follow...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2360535/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16969342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603352 |
_version_ | 1782153073578213376 |
---|---|
author | George, S Primrose, J Talbot, R Smith, J Mullee, M Bailey, D du Boulay, C Jordan, H |
author_facet | George, S Primrose, J Talbot, R Smith, J Mullee, M Bailey, D du Boulay, C Jordan, H |
author_sort | George, S |
collection | PubMed |
description | To investigate the relationship between survival in colorectal cancer patients and the number of lymph nodes examined by a pathologist, previously attributed to stage migration, we used data from a cohort of 5174 colorectal cancer patients recruited between September 1991 and August 1994, and followed-up for 5 years. We selected cases with data present on all prognostic variables, and stratified them into three groups by number of nodes examined. We made a multivariate survival comparison using a Cox regression model. In all, there were 3592 cases with data present on all prognostic variables. Patients who had >10 nodes identified had a significant survival advantage over those who had 5–10 identified, who had in turn a similar advantage over those with 0–4 identified (P<0.001). This effect was present in the whole group and at all Dukes' stages, although statistically significant only in stages B (P=0.004) and C (P=0.019). The effect remained after adjustment in a Cox regression model in which the mean number of nodes taken out by each surgical firm did not predict survival. In a sub-group with data on lymphocytic infiltration into the primary tumour a survival advantage was noted in those with prominent rather than mild infiltration (P<0.001): the former also tended to have more nodes found (P=0.015). Stage migration alone cannot explain these results, as survival advantages are noted across the whole population independent of stage. Lymphocytic infiltration into the primary tumour is prognostically important, and is associated with the number of nodes found. Reactive enlargement of lymph nodes in the mesentery may make them easier to find, reflect immune response to the tumour, and thus indirectly impact upon survival. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2360535 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-23605352009-09-10 Will Rogers revisited: prospective observational study of survival of 3592 patients with colorectal cancer according to number of nodes examined by pathologists George, S Primrose, J Talbot, R Smith, J Mullee, M Bailey, D du Boulay, C Jordan, H Br J Cancer Clinical Study To investigate the relationship between survival in colorectal cancer patients and the number of lymph nodes examined by a pathologist, previously attributed to stage migration, we used data from a cohort of 5174 colorectal cancer patients recruited between September 1991 and August 1994, and followed-up for 5 years. We selected cases with data present on all prognostic variables, and stratified them into three groups by number of nodes examined. We made a multivariate survival comparison using a Cox regression model. In all, there were 3592 cases with data present on all prognostic variables. Patients who had >10 nodes identified had a significant survival advantage over those who had 5–10 identified, who had in turn a similar advantage over those with 0–4 identified (P<0.001). This effect was present in the whole group and at all Dukes' stages, although statistically significant only in stages B (P=0.004) and C (P=0.019). The effect remained after adjustment in a Cox regression model in which the mean number of nodes taken out by each surgical firm did not predict survival. In a sub-group with data on lymphocytic infiltration into the primary tumour a survival advantage was noted in those with prominent rather than mild infiltration (P<0.001): the former also tended to have more nodes found (P=0.015). Stage migration alone cannot explain these results, as survival advantages are noted across the whole population independent of stage. Lymphocytic infiltration into the primary tumour is prognostically important, and is associated with the number of nodes found. Reactive enlargement of lymph nodes in the mesentery may make them easier to find, reflect immune response to the tumour, and thus indirectly impact upon survival. Nature Publishing Group 2006-10-09 2006-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC2360535/ /pubmed/16969342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603352 Text en Copyright © 2006 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study George, S Primrose, J Talbot, R Smith, J Mullee, M Bailey, D du Boulay, C Jordan, H Will Rogers revisited: prospective observational study of survival of 3592 patients with colorectal cancer according to number of nodes examined by pathologists |
title | Will Rogers revisited: prospective observational study of survival of 3592 patients with colorectal cancer according to number of nodes examined by pathologists |
title_full | Will Rogers revisited: prospective observational study of survival of 3592 patients with colorectal cancer according to number of nodes examined by pathologists |
title_fullStr | Will Rogers revisited: prospective observational study of survival of 3592 patients with colorectal cancer according to number of nodes examined by pathologists |
title_full_unstemmed | Will Rogers revisited: prospective observational study of survival of 3592 patients with colorectal cancer according to number of nodes examined by pathologists |
title_short | Will Rogers revisited: prospective observational study of survival of 3592 patients with colorectal cancer according to number of nodes examined by pathologists |
title_sort | will rogers revisited: prospective observational study of survival of 3592 patients with colorectal cancer according to number of nodes examined by pathologists |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2360535/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16969342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603352 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT georges willrogersrevisitedprospectiveobservationalstudyofsurvivalof3592patientswithcolorectalcanceraccordingtonumberofnodesexaminedbypathologists AT primrosej willrogersrevisitedprospectiveobservationalstudyofsurvivalof3592patientswithcolorectalcanceraccordingtonumberofnodesexaminedbypathologists AT talbotr willrogersrevisitedprospectiveobservationalstudyofsurvivalof3592patientswithcolorectalcanceraccordingtonumberofnodesexaminedbypathologists AT smithj willrogersrevisitedprospectiveobservationalstudyofsurvivalof3592patientswithcolorectalcanceraccordingtonumberofnodesexaminedbypathologists AT mulleem willrogersrevisitedprospectiveobservationalstudyofsurvivalof3592patientswithcolorectalcanceraccordingtonumberofnodesexaminedbypathologists AT baileyd willrogersrevisitedprospectiveobservationalstudyofsurvivalof3592patientswithcolorectalcanceraccordingtonumberofnodesexaminedbypathologists AT duboulayc willrogersrevisitedprospectiveobservationalstudyofsurvivalof3592patientswithcolorectalcanceraccordingtonumberofnodesexaminedbypathologists AT jordanh willrogersrevisitedprospectiveobservationalstudyofsurvivalof3592patientswithcolorectalcanceraccordingtonumberofnodesexaminedbypathologists |