Cargando…
Oral contraceptive use and cancer. Findings in a large cohort study, 1968–2004
We examined cancer incidence in relation to oral contraceptive (OC) use in the Oxford Family Planning Association contraceptive study. The study includes 17032 women, recruited at family planning clinics at ages 25–39 years between 1968 and 1974, who were using OCs, a diaphragm, or an intrauterine d...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2360655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16819539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603260 |
_version_ | 1782153102600699904 |
---|---|
author | Vessey, M Painter, R |
author_facet | Vessey, M Painter, R |
author_sort | Vessey, M |
collection | PubMed |
description | We examined cancer incidence in relation to oral contraceptive (OC) use in the Oxford Family Planning Association contraceptive study. The study includes 17032 women, recruited at family planning clinics at ages 25–39 years between 1968 and 1974, who were using OCs, a diaphragm, or an intrauterine device. Follow-up data were available until 2004. OC use was not significantly related to nonreproductive cancer. Breast cancer findings (844 cases) likewise were very reassuring (rate ratio (RR) comparing women ever using OCs with those never doing so 1.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.8–1.1). There was a strong positive relationship between cervical cancer incidence (59 cases) and duration of OC use (RR comparing users for 97+ months with nonusers 6.1, 95%CI, 2.5–17.9). Uterine body cancer (77 cases) and ovarian cancer (106 cases) showed strong negative associations with duration of OC use: RRs for 97+ months of use were 0.1 (95%CI, 0.0–0.4) and 0.3 (95%CI, 0.1–0.5) respectively. This apparent protective effect for both cancers persisted more than 20 years after stopping OCs. Combining data for cancers of the cervix, uterine body and ovary, the age adjusted RR for women ever using OCs compared with those never doing so was 0.7 (95%CI, 0.5–0.8). Beneficial effects of OCs on the gynaecological cancers thus outweighed adverse effects. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2360655 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-23606552009-09-10 Oral contraceptive use and cancer. Findings in a large cohort study, 1968–2004 Vessey, M Painter, R Br J Cancer Epidemiology We examined cancer incidence in relation to oral contraceptive (OC) use in the Oxford Family Planning Association contraceptive study. The study includes 17032 women, recruited at family planning clinics at ages 25–39 years between 1968 and 1974, who were using OCs, a diaphragm, or an intrauterine device. Follow-up data were available until 2004. OC use was not significantly related to nonreproductive cancer. Breast cancer findings (844 cases) likewise were very reassuring (rate ratio (RR) comparing women ever using OCs with those never doing so 1.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.8–1.1). There was a strong positive relationship between cervical cancer incidence (59 cases) and duration of OC use (RR comparing users for 97+ months with nonusers 6.1, 95%CI, 2.5–17.9). Uterine body cancer (77 cases) and ovarian cancer (106 cases) showed strong negative associations with duration of OC use: RRs for 97+ months of use were 0.1 (95%CI, 0.0–0.4) and 0.3 (95%CI, 0.1–0.5) respectively. This apparent protective effect for both cancers persisted more than 20 years after stopping OCs. Combining data for cancers of the cervix, uterine body and ovary, the age adjusted RR for women ever using OCs compared with those never doing so was 0.7 (95%CI, 0.5–0.8). Beneficial effects of OCs on the gynaecological cancers thus outweighed adverse effects. Nature Publishing Group 2006-08-07 2006-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC2360655/ /pubmed/16819539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603260 Text en Copyright © 2006 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Epidemiology Vessey, M Painter, R Oral contraceptive use and cancer. Findings in a large cohort study, 1968–2004 |
title | Oral contraceptive use and cancer. Findings in a large cohort study, 1968–2004 |
title_full | Oral contraceptive use and cancer. Findings in a large cohort study, 1968–2004 |
title_fullStr | Oral contraceptive use and cancer. Findings in a large cohort study, 1968–2004 |
title_full_unstemmed | Oral contraceptive use and cancer. Findings in a large cohort study, 1968–2004 |
title_short | Oral contraceptive use and cancer. Findings in a large cohort study, 1968–2004 |
title_sort | oral contraceptive use and cancer. findings in a large cohort study, 1968–2004 |
topic | Epidemiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2360655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16819539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603260 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vesseym oralcontraceptiveuseandcancerfindingsinalargecohortstudy19682004 AT painterr oralcontraceptiveuseandcancerfindingsinalargecohortstudy19682004 |