Cargando…

Genetic nurse counsellors can be an acceptable and cost-effective alternative to clinical geneticists for breast cancer risk genetic counselling. Evidence from two parallel randomised controlled equivalence trials

This study compared genetic nurse counsellors with standard services for breast cancer genetic risk counselling services in two regional genetics centres, in Grampian region, North East Scotland and in Cardiff, Wales. Women referred for genetic counselling were randomised to an initial genetic couns...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Torrance, N, Mollison, J, Wordsworth, S, Gray, J, Miedzybrodzka, Z, Haites, N, Grant, A, Campbell, M, Watson, M S, Clarke, A, Wilson, B
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2360658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16832415
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603248
_version_ 1782153103299051520
author Torrance, N
Mollison, J
Wordsworth, S
Gray, J
Miedzybrodzka, Z
Haites, N
Grant, A
Campbell, M
Watson, M S
Clarke, A
Wilson, B
author_facet Torrance, N
Mollison, J
Wordsworth, S
Gray, J
Miedzybrodzka, Z
Haites, N
Grant, A
Campbell, M
Watson, M S
Clarke, A
Wilson, B
author_sort Torrance, N
collection PubMed
description This study compared genetic nurse counsellors with standard services for breast cancer genetic risk counselling services in two regional genetics centres, in Grampian region, North East Scotland and in Cardiff, Wales. Women referred for genetic counselling were randomised to an initial genetic counselling appointment with either a genetic nurse counsellor (intervention) or a clinical geneticist (current service, control). Participants completed postal questionnaires before, immediately after the counselling episode and 6 months later to assess anxiety, general health status, perceived risk and satisfaction. A parallel economic evaluation explored factors influencing cost-effectiveness. The two concurrent randomised controlled equivalence trials were conducted and analysed separately. In the Grampian trial, 289 patients (193 intervention, 96 control) and in the Wales trial 297 patients (197 intervention and 100 control) returned a baseline questionnaire and attended their appointment. Analysis suggested at least likely equivalence in anxiety (the primary outcome) between the two arms of the trials. The cost per counselling episode was £11.54 less for nurse-based care in the Grampian trial and £12.50 more for nurse-based care in Cardiff. The costs were sensitive to the grade of doctor (notionally) replaced and the extent of consultant supervision required by the nurse. In conclusion, care based on genetic nurse counsellors was not significantly different from conventional cancer genetic services in both trial locations.
format Text
id pubmed-2360658
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23606582009-09-10 Genetic nurse counsellors can be an acceptable and cost-effective alternative to clinical geneticists for breast cancer risk genetic counselling. Evidence from two parallel randomised controlled equivalence trials Torrance, N Mollison, J Wordsworth, S Gray, J Miedzybrodzka, Z Haites, N Grant, A Campbell, M Watson, M S Clarke, A Wilson, B Br J Cancer Clinical Study This study compared genetic nurse counsellors with standard services for breast cancer genetic risk counselling services in two regional genetics centres, in Grampian region, North East Scotland and in Cardiff, Wales. Women referred for genetic counselling were randomised to an initial genetic counselling appointment with either a genetic nurse counsellor (intervention) or a clinical geneticist (current service, control). Participants completed postal questionnaires before, immediately after the counselling episode and 6 months later to assess anxiety, general health status, perceived risk and satisfaction. A parallel economic evaluation explored factors influencing cost-effectiveness. The two concurrent randomised controlled equivalence trials were conducted and analysed separately. In the Grampian trial, 289 patients (193 intervention, 96 control) and in the Wales trial 297 patients (197 intervention and 100 control) returned a baseline questionnaire and attended their appointment. Analysis suggested at least likely equivalence in anxiety (the primary outcome) between the two arms of the trials. The cost per counselling episode was £11.54 less for nurse-based care in the Grampian trial and £12.50 more for nurse-based care in Cardiff. The costs were sensitive to the grade of doctor (notionally) replaced and the extent of consultant supervision required by the nurse. In conclusion, care based on genetic nurse counsellors was not significantly different from conventional cancer genetic services in both trial locations. Nature Publishing Group 2006-08-21 2006-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2360658/ /pubmed/16832415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603248 Text en Copyright © 2006 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Torrance, N
Mollison, J
Wordsworth, S
Gray, J
Miedzybrodzka, Z
Haites, N
Grant, A
Campbell, M
Watson, M S
Clarke, A
Wilson, B
Genetic nurse counsellors can be an acceptable and cost-effective alternative to clinical geneticists for breast cancer risk genetic counselling. Evidence from two parallel randomised controlled equivalence trials
title Genetic nurse counsellors can be an acceptable and cost-effective alternative to clinical geneticists for breast cancer risk genetic counselling. Evidence from two parallel randomised controlled equivalence trials
title_full Genetic nurse counsellors can be an acceptable and cost-effective alternative to clinical geneticists for breast cancer risk genetic counselling. Evidence from two parallel randomised controlled equivalence trials
title_fullStr Genetic nurse counsellors can be an acceptable and cost-effective alternative to clinical geneticists for breast cancer risk genetic counselling. Evidence from two parallel randomised controlled equivalence trials
title_full_unstemmed Genetic nurse counsellors can be an acceptable and cost-effective alternative to clinical geneticists for breast cancer risk genetic counselling. Evidence from two parallel randomised controlled equivalence trials
title_short Genetic nurse counsellors can be an acceptable and cost-effective alternative to clinical geneticists for breast cancer risk genetic counselling. Evidence from two parallel randomised controlled equivalence trials
title_sort genetic nurse counsellors can be an acceptable and cost-effective alternative to clinical geneticists for breast cancer risk genetic counselling. evidence from two parallel randomised controlled equivalence trials
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2360658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16832415
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603248
work_keys_str_mv AT torrancen geneticnursecounsellorscanbeanacceptableandcosteffectivealternativetoclinicalgeneticistsforbreastcancerriskgeneticcounsellingevidencefromtwoparallelrandomisedcontrolledequivalencetrials
AT mollisonj geneticnursecounsellorscanbeanacceptableandcosteffectivealternativetoclinicalgeneticistsforbreastcancerriskgeneticcounsellingevidencefromtwoparallelrandomisedcontrolledequivalencetrials
AT wordsworths geneticnursecounsellorscanbeanacceptableandcosteffectivealternativetoclinicalgeneticistsforbreastcancerriskgeneticcounsellingevidencefromtwoparallelrandomisedcontrolledequivalencetrials
AT grayj geneticnursecounsellorscanbeanacceptableandcosteffectivealternativetoclinicalgeneticistsforbreastcancerriskgeneticcounsellingevidencefromtwoparallelrandomisedcontrolledequivalencetrials
AT miedzybrodzkaz geneticnursecounsellorscanbeanacceptableandcosteffectivealternativetoclinicalgeneticistsforbreastcancerriskgeneticcounsellingevidencefromtwoparallelrandomisedcontrolledequivalencetrials
AT haitesn geneticnursecounsellorscanbeanacceptableandcosteffectivealternativetoclinicalgeneticistsforbreastcancerriskgeneticcounsellingevidencefromtwoparallelrandomisedcontrolledequivalencetrials
AT granta geneticnursecounsellorscanbeanacceptableandcosteffectivealternativetoclinicalgeneticistsforbreastcancerriskgeneticcounsellingevidencefromtwoparallelrandomisedcontrolledequivalencetrials
AT campbellm geneticnursecounsellorscanbeanacceptableandcosteffectivealternativetoclinicalgeneticistsforbreastcancerriskgeneticcounsellingevidencefromtwoparallelrandomisedcontrolledequivalencetrials
AT watsonms geneticnursecounsellorscanbeanacceptableandcosteffectivealternativetoclinicalgeneticistsforbreastcancerriskgeneticcounsellingevidencefromtwoparallelrandomisedcontrolledequivalencetrials
AT clarkea geneticnursecounsellorscanbeanacceptableandcosteffectivealternativetoclinicalgeneticistsforbreastcancerriskgeneticcounsellingevidencefromtwoparallelrandomisedcontrolledequivalencetrials
AT wilsonb geneticnursecounsellorscanbeanacceptableandcosteffectivealternativetoclinicalgeneticistsforbreastcancerriskgeneticcounsellingevidencefromtwoparallelrandomisedcontrolledequivalencetrials