Cargando…

MRI directed multidisciplinary team preoperative treatment strategy: the way to eliminate positive circumferential margins?

Histopathological audit of positive circumferential resection margins (CRMs) can be used as a surrogate measure of the success of rectal cancer treatment. We audited CRM involvement in rectal cancer patients and the impact of the multidisciplinary team (MDT) on implementing a magnetic resonance imag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burton, S, Brown, G, Daniels, I R, Norman, A R, Mason, B, Cunningham, D
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2361145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16465171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602947
_version_ 1782153148675129344
author Burton, S
Brown, G
Daniels, I R
Norman, A R
Mason, B
Cunningham, D
author_facet Burton, S
Brown, G
Daniels, I R
Norman, A R
Mason, B
Cunningham, D
author_sort Burton, S
collection PubMed
description Histopathological audit of positive circumferential resection margins (CRMs) can be used as a surrogate measure of the success of rectal cancer treatment. We audited CRM involvement in rectal cancer patients and the impact of the multidisciplinary team (MDT) on implementing a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based preoperative treatment strategy. Data were collected on all newly diagnosed rectal cancer patients treated in our network between January 1999 and December 2002. Data were analysed for MRI prediction and histopathological assessment of CRM together with the MDT meeting treatment decisions. The CRM+ve rate of those discussed at MDT vs those not discussed were compared. We re-audited the CRM+ve rates 1 year after introducing a policy of mandatory preoperative MRI-based MDT discussion. Of the 298 patients diagnosed with rectal cancer, 39 (13%) were deemed palliative, 178 underwent surgery alone and 81 underwent neoadjuvant therapy. Of these, 62 out of 178 patients underwent surgery alone without MRI-based MDT discussion resulting in positive CRM in 16 cases (26%) as compared to 1 out of 116 (1%) in those patients with MDT discussion of MRI. Overall CRM+ve rate in all nonpalliative patients with or without MDT discussion was 12.5% (32 out of 256), significantly lower than the <20% rate (P<0.001) quoted in national guidelines. Re-audit in 98 consecutive patients following a change of policy produced a lower CRM+ve rate of 3% (1 out of 37) for all surgery alone patients and an overall CRM+ve rate of 7% (5 out of 70). In conclusion, MDT discussion of MRI and implementation of a preoperative treatment strategy results in significantly reduced positive CRM in rectal cancer patients.
format Text
id pubmed-2361145
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23611452009-09-10 MRI directed multidisciplinary team preoperative treatment strategy: the way to eliminate positive circumferential margins? Burton, S Brown, G Daniels, I R Norman, A R Mason, B Cunningham, D Br J Cancer Clinical Study Histopathological audit of positive circumferential resection margins (CRMs) can be used as a surrogate measure of the success of rectal cancer treatment. We audited CRM involvement in rectal cancer patients and the impact of the multidisciplinary team (MDT) on implementing a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based preoperative treatment strategy. Data were collected on all newly diagnosed rectal cancer patients treated in our network between January 1999 and December 2002. Data were analysed for MRI prediction and histopathological assessment of CRM together with the MDT meeting treatment decisions. The CRM+ve rate of those discussed at MDT vs those not discussed were compared. We re-audited the CRM+ve rates 1 year after introducing a policy of mandatory preoperative MRI-based MDT discussion. Of the 298 patients diagnosed with rectal cancer, 39 (13%) were deemed palliative, 178 underwent surgery alone and 81 underwent neoadjuvant therapy. Of these, 62 out of 178 patients underwent surgery alone without MRI-based MDT discussion resulting in positive CRM in 16 cases (26%) as compared to 1 out of 116 (1%) in those patients with MDT discussion of MRI. Overall CRM+ve rate in all nonpalliative patients with or without MDT discussion was 12.5% (32 out of 256), significantly lower than the <20% rate (P<0.001) quoted in national guidelines. Re-audit in 98 consecutive patients following a change of policy produced a lower CRM+ve rate of 3% (1 out of 37) for all surgery alone patients and an overall CRM+ve rate of 7% (5 out of 70). In conclusion, MDT discussion of MRI and implementation of a preoperative treatment strategy results in significantly reduced positive CRM in rectal cancer patients. Nature Publishing Group 2006-02-13 2006-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC2361145/ /pubmed/16465171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602947 Text en Copyright © 2006 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Burton, S
Brown, G
Daniels, I R
Norman, A R
Mason, B
Cunningham, D
MRI directed multidisciplinary team preoperative treatment strategy: the way to eliminate positive circumferential margins?
title MRI directed multidisciplinary team preoperative treatment strategy: the way to eliminate positive circumferential margins?
title_full MRI directed multidisciplinary team preoperative treatment strategy: the way to eliminate positive circumferential margins?
title_fullStr MRI directed multidisciplinary team preoperative treatment strategy: the way to eliminate positive circumferential margins?
title_full_unstemmed MRI directed multidisciplinary team preoperative treatment strategy: the way to eliminate positive circumferential margins?
title_short MRI directed multidisciplinary team preoperative treatment strategy: the way to eliminate positive circumferential margins?
title_sort mri directed multidisciplinary team preoperative treatment strategy: the way to eliminate positive circumferential margins?
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2361145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16465171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602947
work_keys_str_mv AT burtons mridirectedmultidisciplinaryteampreoperativetreatmentstrategythewaytoeliminatepositivecircumferentialmargins
AT browng mridirectedmultidisciplinaryteampreoperativetreatmentstrategythewaytoeliminatepositivecircumferentialmargins
AT danielsir mridirectedmultidisciplinaryteampreoperativetreatmentstrategythewaytoeliminatepositivecircumferentialmargins
AT normanar mridirectedmultidisciplinaryteampreoperativetreatmentstrategythewaytoeliminatepositivecircumferentialmargins
AT masonb mridirectedmultidisciplinaryteampreoperativetreatmentstrategythewaytoeliminatepositivecircumferentialmargins
AT cunninghamd mridirectedmultidisciplinaryteampreoperativetreatmentstrategythewaytoeliminatepositivecircumferentialmargins