Cargando…
Feasibility of familial PSA screening: psychosocial issues and screening adherence
This study examined factors that predict psychological morbidity and screening adherence in first-degree relatives (FDRs) taking part in a familial PSA screening study. Prostate cancer patients (index cases – ICs) who gave consent for their FDRs to be contacted for a familial PSA screening study to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2361177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16434991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602959 |
_version_ | 1782153152167936000 |
---|---|
author | Sweetman, J Watson, M Norman, A Bunstead, Z Hopwood, P Melia, J Moss, S Eeles, R Dearnaley, D Moynihan, C |
author_facet | Sweetman, J Watson, M Norman, A Bunstead, Z Hopwood, P Melia, J Moss, S Eeles, R Dearnaley, D Moynihan, C |
author_sort | Sweetman, J |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study examined factors that predict psychological morbidity and screening adherence in first-degree relatives (FDRs) taking part in a familial PSA screening study. Prostate cancer patients (index cases – ICs) who gave consent for their FDRs to be contacted for a familial PSA screening study to contact their FDRs were also asked permission to invite these FDRs into a linked psychosocial study. Participants were assessed on measures of psychological morbidity (including the General Health Questionnaire; Cancer Worry Scale; Health Anxiety Questionnaire; Impact of Events Scale); and perceived benefits and barriers, knowledge; perceived risk/susceptibility; family history; and socio-demographics. Of 255 ICs, 155 (61%) consented to their FDRs being contacted. Of 207 FDRs approached, 128 (62%) consented and completed questionnaires. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that health anxiety, perceived risk and subjective stress predicted higher cancer worry (P=0.05). Measures of psychological morbidity did not predict screening adherence. Only past screening behaviour reliably predicted adherence to familial screening (P=0.05). First-degree relatives entering the linked familial PSA screening programme do not, in general, have high levels of psychological morbidity. However, a small number of men exhibited psychological distress. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2361177 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-23611772009-09-10 Feasibility of familial PSA screening: psychosocial issues and screening adherence Sweetman, J Watson, M Norman, A Bunstead, Z Hopwood, P Melia, J Moss, S Eeles, R Dearnaley, D Moynihan, C Br J Cancer Clinical Study This study examined factors that predict psychological morbidity and screening adherence in first-degree relatives (FDRs) taking part in a familial PSA screening study. Prostate cancer patients (index cases – ICs) who gave consent for their FDRs to be contacted for a familial PSA screening study to contact their FDRs were also asked permission to invite these FDRs into a linked psychosocial study. Participants were assessed on measures of psychological morbidity (including the General Health Questionnaire; Cancer Worry Scale; Health Anxiety Questionnaire; Impact of Events Scale); and perceived benefits and barriers, knowledge; perceived risk/susceptibility; family history; and socio-demographics. Of 255 ICs, 155 (61%) consented to their FDRs being contacted. Of 207 FDRs approached, 128 (62%) consented and completed questionnaires. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that health anxiety, perceived risk and subjective stress predicted higher cancer worry (P=0.05). Measures of psychological morbidity did not predict screening adherence. Only past screening behaviour reliably predicted adherence to familial screening (P=0.05). First-degree relatives entering the linked familial PSA screening programme do not, in general, have high levels of psychological morbidity. However, a small number of men exhibited psychological distress. Nature Publishing Group 2006-02-27 2006-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2361177/ /pubmed/16434991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602959 Text en Copyright © 2006 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Sweetman, J Watson, M Norman, A Bunstead, Z Hopwood, P Melia, J Moss, S Eeles, R Dearnaley, D Moynihan, C Feasibility of familial PSA screening: psychosocial issues and screening adherence |
title | Feasibility of familial PSA screening: psychosocial issues and screening adherence |
title_full | Feasibility of familial PSA screening: psychosocial issues and screening adherence |
title_fullStr | Feasibility of familial PSA screening: psychosocial issues and screening adherence |
title_full_unstemmed | Feasibility of familial PSA screening: psychosocial issues and screening adherence |
title_short | Feasibility of familial PSA screening: psychosocial issues and screening adherence |
title_sort | feasibility of familial psa screening: psychosocial issues and screening adherence |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2361177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16434991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602959 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sweetmanj feasibilityoffamilialpsascreeningpsychosocialissuesandscreeningadherence AT watsonm feasibilityoffamilialpsascreeningpsychosocialissuesandscreeningadherence AT normana feasibilityoffamilialpsascreeningpsychosocialissuesandscreeningadherence AT bunsteadz feasibilityoffamilialpsascreeningpsychosocialissuesandscreeningadherence AT hopwoodp feasibilityoffamilialpsascreeningpsychosocialissuesandscreeningadherence AT meliaj feasibilityoffamilialpsascreeningpsychosocialissuesandscreeningadherence AT mosss feasibilityoffamilialpsascreeningpsychosocialissuesandscreeningadherence AT eelesr feasibilityoffamilialpsascreeningpsychosocialissuesandscreeningadherence AT dearnaleyd feasibilityoffamilialpsascreeningpsychosocialissuesandscreeningadherence AT moynihanc feasibilityoffamilialpsascreeningpsychosocialissuesandscreeningadherence |