Cargando…

Feasibility of familial PSA screening: psychosocial issues and screening adherence

This study examined factors that predict psychological morbidity and screening adherence in first-degree relatives (FDRs) taking part in a familial PSA screening study. Prostate cancer patients (index cases – ICs) who gave consent for their FDRs to be contacted for a familial PSA screening study to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sweetman, J, Watson, M, Norman, A, Bunstead, Z, Hopwood, P, Melia, J, Moss, S, Eeles, R, Dearnaley, D, Moynihan, C
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2361177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16434991
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602959
_version_ 1782153152167936000
author Sweetman, J
Watson, M
Norman, A
Bunstead, Z
Hopwood, P
Melia, J
Moss, S
Eeles, R
Dearnaley, D
Moynihan, C
author_facet Sweetman, J
Watson, M
Norman, A
Bunstead, Z
Hopwood, P
Melia, J
Moss, S
Eeles, R
Dearnaley, D
Moynihan, C
author_sort Sweetman, J
collection PubMed
description This study examined factors that predict psychological morbidity and screening adherence in first-degree relatives (FDRs) taking part in a familial PSA screening study. Prostate cancer patients (index cases – ICs) who gave consent for their FDRs to be contacted for a familial PSA screening study to contact their FDRs were also asked permission to invite these FDRs into a linked psychosocial study. Participants were assessed on measures of psychological morbidity (including the General Health Questionnaire; Cancer Worry Scale; Health Anxiety Questionnaire; Impact of Events Scale); and perceived benefits and barriers, knowledge; perceived risk/susceptibility; family history; and socio-demographics. Of 255 ICs, 155 (61%) consented to their FDRs being contacted. Of 207 FDRs approached, 128 (62%) consented and completed questionnaires. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that health anxiety, perceived risk and subjective stress predicted higher cancer worry (P=0.05). Measures of psychological morbidity did not predict screening adherence. Only past screening behaviour reliably predicted adherence to familial screening (P=0.05). First-degree relatives entering the linked familial PSA screening programme do not, in general, have high levels of psychological morbidity. However, a small number of men exhibited psychological distress.
format Text
id pubmed-2361177
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23611772009-09-10 Feasibility of familial PSA screening: psychosocial issues and screening adherence Sweetman, J Watson, M Norman, A Bunstead, Z Hopwood, P Melia, J Moss, S Eeles, R Dearnaley, D Moynihan, C Br J Cancer Clinical Study This study examined factors that predict psychological morbidity and screening adherence in first-degree relatives (FDRs) taking part in a familial PSA screening study. Prostate cancer patients (index cases – ICs) who gave consent for their FDRs to be contacted for a familial PSA screening study to contact their FDRs were also asked permission to invite these FDRs into a linked psychosocial study. Participants were assessed on measures of psychological morbidity (including the General Health Questionnaire; Cancer Worry Scale; Health Anxiety Questionnaire; Impact of Events Scale); and perceived benefits and barriers, knowledge; perceived risk/susceptibility; family history; and socio-demographics. Of 255 ICs, 155 (61%) consented to their FDRs being contacted. Of 207 FDRs approached, 128 (62%) consented and completed questionnaires. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that health anxiety, perceived risk and subjective stress predicted higher cancer worry (P=0.05). Measures of psychological morbidity did not predict screening adherence. Only past screening behaviour reliably predicted adherence to familial screening (P=0.05). First-degree relatives entering the linked familial PSA screening programme do not, in general, have high levels of psychological morbidity. However, a small number of men exhibited psychological distress. Nature Publishing Group 2006-02-27 2006-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC2361177/ /pubmed/16434991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602959 Text en Copyright © 2006 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Sweetman, J
Watson, M
Norman, A
Bunstead, Z
Hopwood, P
Melia, J
Moss, S
Eeles, R
Dearnaley, D
Moynihan, C
Feasibility of familial PSA screening: psychosocial issues and screening adherence
title Feasibility of familial PSA screening: psychosocial issues and screening adherence
title_full Feasibility of familial PSA screening: psychosocial issues and screening adherence
title_fullStr Feasibility of familial PSA screening: psychosocial issues and screening adherence
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of familial PSA screening: psychosocial issues and screening adherence
title_short Feasibility of familial PSA screening: psychosocial issues and screening adherence
title_sort feasibility of familial psa screening: psychosocial issues and screening adherence
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2361177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16434991
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602959
work_keys_str_mv AT sweetmanj feasibilityoffamilialpsascreeningpsychosocialissuesandscreeningadherence
AT watsonm feasibilityoffamilialpsascreeningpsychosocialissuesandscreeningadherence
AT normana feasibilityoffamilialpsascreeningpsychosocialissuesandscreeningadherence
AT bunsteadz feasibilityoffamilialpsascreeningpsychosocialissuesandscreeningadherence
AT hopwoodp feasibilityoffamilialpsascreeningpsychosocialissuesandscreeningadherence
AT meliaj feasibilityoffamilialpsascreeningpsychosocialissuesandscreeningadherence
AT mosss feasibilityoffamilialpsascreeningpsychosocialissuesandscreeningadherence
AT eelesr feasibilityoffamilialpsascreeningpsychosocialissuesandscreeningadherence
AT dearnaleyd feasibilityoffamilialpsascreeningpsychosocialissuesandscreeningadherence
AT moynihanc feasibilityoffamilialpsascreeningpsychosocialissuesandscreeningadherence