Cargando…

Role of lymphangiogenesis in epithelial ovarian cancer

We investigated the significance of lymphatic count, vascular count and angiogenic growth factors using immunohistochemistry in 108 tumour specimens of epithelial ovarian cancer with antibodies to lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor (LYVE-1), platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sundar, S S, Zhang, H, Brown, P, Manek, S, Han, C, Kaur, K, Charnock, M F L, Jackson, D, Ganesan, T S
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2361318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16685274
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603144
_version_ 1782153186893627392
author Sundar, S S
Zhang, H
Brown, P
Manek, S
Han, C
Kaur, K
Charnock, M F L
Jackson, D
Ganesan, T S
author_facet Sundar, S S
Zhang, H
Brown, P
Manek, S
Han, C
Kaur, K
Charnock, M F L
Jackson, D
Ganesan, T S
author_sort Sundar, S S
collection PubMed
description We investigated the significance of lymphatic count, vascular count and angiogenic growth factors using immunohistochemistry in 108 tumour specimens of epithelial ovarian cancer with antibodies to lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor (LYVE-1), platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule CD31, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and thymidine phosphorylase (TP) in epithelial ovarian cancer to understand the pathogenesis of metastasis in ovarian cancer. The effect of prognostic variables on progression-free and overall survival was assessed. On multivariate analysis, bulky residual disease after surgery was the best prognostic indicator (P<0.001) for progression-free and overall survival (P<0.001). Lymphatic count was statistically significant as a prognostic factor for progression-free (P=0.05) and overall survival (P=0.04). However, lymphatic count did not impact on survival curves. No correlation was found between lymphatic count and age, histological subtype, FIGO stage or residual disease. Vascular count, VEGF or TP expressions were not significant in either analysis. Lymphatic spread may be significant in aiding metastases in ovarian cancer but requires other biological factors to act in conjunction, as it does not have clearcut prognostic significance. Dissemination of ovarian cancer does not occur primarily through vascular or lymphatic routes but may occur through direct intraperitoneal spread of disease.
format Text
id pubmed-2361318
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23613182009-09-10 Role of lymphangiogenesis in epithelial ovarian cancer Sundar, S S Zhang, H Brown, P Manek, S Han, C Kaur, K Charnock, M F L Jackson, D Ganesan, T S Br J Cancer Molecular Diagnostics We investigated the significance of lymphatic count, vascular count and angiogenic growth factors using immunohistochemistry in 108 tumour specimens of epithelial ovarian cancer with antibodies to lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor (LYVE-1), platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule CD31, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and thymidine phosphorylase (TP) in epithelial ovarian cancer to understand the pathogenesis of metastasis in ovarian cancer. The effect of prognostic variables on progression-free and overall survival was assessed. On multivariate analysis, bulky residual disease after surgery was the best prognostic indicator (P<0.001) for progression-free and overall survival (P<0.001). Lymphatic count was statistically significant as a prognostic factor for progression-free (P=0.05) and overall survival (P=0.04). However, lymphatic count did not impact on survival curves. No correlation was found between lymphatic count and age, histological subtype, FIGO stage or residual disease. Vascular count, VEGF or TP expressions were not significant in either analysis. Lymphatic spread may be significant in aiding metastases in ovarian cancer but requires other biological factors to act in conjunction, as it does not have clearcut prognostic significance. Dissemination of ovarian cancer does not occur primarily through vascular or lymphatic routes but may occur through direct intraperitoneal spread of disease. Nature Publishing Group 2006-06-05 2006-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC2361318/ /pubmed/16685274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603144 Text en Copyright © 2006 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Molecular Diagnostics
Sundar, S S
Zhang, H
Brown, P
Manek, S
Han, C
Kaur, K
Charnock, M F L
Jackson, D
Ganesan, T S
Role of lymphangiogenesis in epithelial ovarian cancer
title Role of lymphangiogenesis in epithelial ovarian cancer
title_full Role of lymphangiogenesis in epithelial ovarian cancer
title_fullStr Role of lymphangiogenesis in epithelial ovarian cancer
title_full_unstemmed Role of lymphangiogenesis in epithelial ovarian cancer
title_short Role of lymphangiogenesis in epithelial ovarian cancer
title_sort role of lymphangiogenesis in epithelial ovarian cancer
topic Molecular Diagnostics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2361318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16685274
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603144
work_keys_str_mv AT sundarss roleoflymphangiogenesisinepithelialovariancancer
AT zhangh roleoflymphangiogenesisinepithelialovariancancer
AT brownp roleoflymphangiogenesisinepithelialovariancancer
AT maneks roleoflymphangiogenesisinepithelialovariancancer
AT hanc roleoflymphangiogenesisinepithelialovariancancer
AT kaurk roleoflymphangiogenesisinepithelialovariancancer
AT charnockmfl roleoflymphangiogenesisinepithelialovariancancer
AT jacksond roleoflymphangiogenesisinepithelialovariancancer
AT ganesants roleoflymphangiogenesisinepithelialovariancancer