Cargando…

Microvessel density and VEGF expression are prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. Meta-analysis of the literature

We performed a meta-analysis of all published studies relating intratumoural microvessel density (MVD) (45 studies) or vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression (27 studies), both reflecting angiogenesis, to relapse free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in colorectal cancer (CRC). For each...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Des Guetz, G, Uzzan, B, Nicolas, P, Cucherat, M, Morere, J-F, Benamouzig, R, Breau, J-L, Perret, G-Y
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2361355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16773076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603176
_version_ 1782153196281528320
author Des Guetz, G
Uzzan, B
Nicolas, P
Cucherat, M
Morere, J-F
Benamouzig, R
Breau, J-L
Perret, G-Y
author_facet Des Guetz, G
Uzzan, B
Nicolas, P
Cucherat, M
Morere, J-F
Benamouzig, R
Breau, J-L
Perret, G-Y
author_sort Des Guetz, G
collection PubMed
description We performed a meta-analysis of all published studies relating intratumoural microvessel density (MVD) (45 studies) or vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression (27 studies), both reflecting angiogenesis, to relapse free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in colorectal cancer (CRC). For each study, MVD impact was measured by risk ratio between the two survival distributions with median MVD as cutoff. Eleven studies did not mention survival data or fit inclusion criteria, six were multiple publications of same series, leaving 32 independent studies for MVD (3496 patients) and 18 for VEGF (2050 patients). Microvessel density was assessed by immunohistochemistry, using antibodies against factor VIII (16 studies), CD31 (10 studies) or CD34 (seven studies). Vascular endothelial growth factor expression was mostly assessed by immunohistochemistry. Statistics were performed for MVD in 22 studies (the others lacking survival statistics) including nine studies (n=957) for RFS and 18 for OS (n=2383) and for VEGF in 17 studies, including nine studies for RFS (n=1064) and 10 for OS (n=1301). High MVD significantly predicted poor RFS (RR=2.32 95% CI: 1.39–3.90; P<0.001) and OS (RR=1.44; 95% CI: 1.08–1.92; P=0.01). Using CD31 or CD34, MVD was inversely related to survival, whereas it was not using factor VIII. Vascular endothelial growth factor expression significantly predicted poor RFS (RR=2.84; 95% CI: 1.95–4.16) and OS (RR=1.65; 95% CI: 1.27–2.14). To strengthen our findings, future prospective studies should explore the relation between MVD or VEGF expression and survival or response to therapy (e.g. antiangiogenic therapy). Assessment of these angiogenic markers should be better standardised in future studies.
format Text
id pubmed-2361355
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23613552009-09-10 Microvessel density and VEGF expression are prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. Meta-analysis of the literature Des Guetz, G Uzzan, B Nicolas, P Cucherat, M Morere, J-F Benamouzig, R Breau, J-L Perret, G-Y Br J Cancer Clinical Study We performed a meta-analysis of all published studies relating intratumoural microvessel density (MVD) (45 studies) or vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression (27 studies), both reflecting angiogenesis, to relapse free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in colorectal cancer (CRC). For each study, MVD impact was measured by risk ratio between the two survival distributions with median MVD as cutoff. Eleven studies did not mention survival data or fit inclusion criteria, six were multiple publications of same series, leaving 32 independent studies for MVD (3496 patients) and 18 for VEGF (2050 patients). Microvessel density was assessed by immunohistochemistry, using antibodies against factor VIII (16 studies), CD31 (10 studies) or CD34 (seven studies). Vascular endothelial growth factor expression was mostly assessed by immunohistochemistry. Statistics were performed for MVD in 22 studies (the others lacking survival statistics) including nine studies (n=957) for RFS and 18 for OS (n=2383) and for VEGF in 17 studies, including nine studies for RFS (n=1064) and 10 for OS (n=1301). High MVD significantly predicted poor RFS (RR=2.32 95% CI: 1.39–3.90; P<0.001) and OS (RR=1.44; 95% CI: 1.08–1.92; P=0.01). Using CD31 or CD34, MVD was inversely related to survival, whereas it was not using factor VIII. Vascular endothelial growth factor expression significantly predicted poor RFS (RR=2.84; 95% CI: 1.95–4.16) and OS (RR=1.65; 95% CI: 1.27–2.14). To strengthen our findings, future prospective studies should explore the relation between MVD or VEGF expression and survival or response to therapy (e.g. antiangiogenic therapy). Assessment of these angiogenic markers should be better standardised in future studies. Nature Publishing Group 2006-06-19 2006-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC2361355/ /pubmed/16773076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603176 Text en Copyright © 2006 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Des Guetz, G
Uzzan, B
Nicolas, P
Cucherat, M
Morere, J-F
Benamouzig, R
Breau, J-L
Perret, G-Y
Microvessel density and VEGF expression are prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. Meta-analysis of the literature
title Microvessel density and VEGF expression are prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. Meta-analysis of the literature
title_full Microvessel density and VEGF expression are prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. Meta-analysis of the literature
title_fullStr Microvessel density and VEGF expression are prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. Meta-analysis of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Microvessel density and VEGF expression are prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. Meta-analysis of the literature
title_short Microvessel density and VEGF expression are prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. Meta-analysis of the literature
title_sort microvessel density and vegf expression are prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. meta-analysis of the literature
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2361355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16773076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603176
work_keys_str_mv AT desguetzg microvesseldensityandvegfexpressionareprognosticfactorsincolorectalcancermetaanalysisoftheliterature
AT uzzanb microvesseldensityandvegfexpressionareprognosticfactorsincolorectalcancermetaanalysisoftheliterature
AT nicolasp microvesseldensityandvegfexpressionareprognosticfactorsincolorectalcancermetaanalysisoftheliterature
AT cucheratm microvesseldensityandvegfexpressionareprognosticfactorsincolorectalcancermetaanalysisoftheliterature
AT morerejf microvesseldensityandvegfexpressionareprognosticfactorsincolorectalcancermetaanalysisoftheliterature
AT benamouzigr microvesseldensityandvegfexpressionareprognosticfactorsincolorectalcancermetaanalysisoftheliterature
AT breaujl microvesseldensityandvegfexpressionareprognosticfactorsincolorectalcancermetaanalysisoftheliterature
AT perretgy microvesseldensityandvegfexpressionareprognosticfactorsincolorectalcancermetaanalysisoftheliterature