Cargando…

The importance of anaemia in diagnosing colorectal cancer: a case–control study using electronic primary care records

Although anaemia is recognised as a feature of colorectal cancer, the precise risk is unknown. We performed a case–control study using electronic primary care records from the Health Improvement Network database, UK. A total of 6442 patients had a diagnosis of colorectal cancer, and were matched to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamilton, W, Lancashire, R, Sharp, D, Peters, T J, Cheng, K K, Marshall, T
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2361444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18219289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604165
_version_ 1782153212334178304
author Hamilton, W
Lancashire, R
Sharp, D
Peters, T J
Cheng, K K
Marshall, T
author_facet Hamilton, W
Lancashire, R
Sharp, D
Peters, T J
Cheng, K K
Marshall, T
author_sort Hamilton, W
collection PubMed
description Although anaemia is recognised as a feature of colorectal cancer, the precise risk is unknown. We performed a case–control study using electronic primary care records from the Health Improvement Network database, UK. A total of 6442 patients had a diagnosis of colorectal cancer, and were matched to 45 066 controls on age, sex, and practice. We calculated likelihood ratios and positive predictive values for colorectal cancer in both sexes across 1 g dl(−1) haemoglobin and 10-year age bands, and examined the features of iron deficiency.In men, 178 (5.2%) of 3421 cases and 47 (0.2%) of 23 928 controls had a haemoglobin <9.0 g dl(−1), giving a likelihood ratio (95% confidence interval) of 27 (19, 36). In women, the corresponding figures were 227 (7.5%) of 3021 cases and 58 (0.3%) of 21 138 controls, a likelihood ratio of 41 (30, 61). Positive predictive values increased with age and for each 1 g dl(−1) reduction in haemoglobin. The risk of cancer for current referral guidance was quantified. For men over 60 years with a haemoglobin <11 g dl(−1) and features of iron deficiency, the positive predictive value was 13.3% (9.7, 18) and for women with a haemoglobin <10 g dl(−1) and iron deficiency, the positive predictive value was 7.7% (5.7, 11). Current guidance for urgent investigation of anaemia misses some patients with a moderate risk of cancer, particularly men.
format Text
id pubmed-2361444
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23614442009-09-10 The importance of anaemia in diagnosing colorectal cancer: a case–control study using electronic primary care records Hamilton, W Lancashire, R Sharp, D Peters, T J Cheng, K K Marshall, T Br J Cancer Clinical Study Although anaemia is recognised as a feature of colorectal cancer, the precise risk is unknown. We performed a case–control study using electronic primary care records from the Health Improvement Network database, UK. A total of 6442 patients had a diagnosis of colorectal cancer, and were matched to 45 066 controls on age, sex, and practice. We calculated likelihood ratios and positive predictive values for colorectal cancer in both sexes across 1 g dl(−1) haemoglobin and 10-year age bands, and examined the features of iron deficiency.In men, 178 (5.2%) of 3421 cases and 47 (0.2%) of 23 928 controls had a haemoglobin <9.0 g dl(−1), giving a likelihood ratio (95% confidence interval) of 27 (19, 36). In women, the corresponding figures were 227 (7.5%) of 3021 cases and 58 (0.3%) of 21 138 controls, a likelihood ratio of 41 (30, 61). Positive predictive values increased with age and for each 1 g dl(−1) reduction in haemoglobin. The risk of cancer for current referral guidance was quantified. For men over 60 years with a haemoglobin <11 g dl(−1) and features of iron deficiency, the positive predictive value was 13.3% (9.7, 18) and for women with a haemoglobin <10 g dl(−1) and iron deficiency, the positive predictive value was 7.7% (5.7, 11). Current guidance for urgent investigation of anaemia misses some patients with a moderate risk of cancer, particularly men. Nature Publishing Group 2008-01-29 2008-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC2361444/ /pubmed/18219289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604165 Text en Copyright © 2008 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Hamilton, W
Lancashire, R
Sharp, D
Peters, T J
Cheng, K K
Marshall, T
The importance of anaemia in diagnosing colorectal cancer: a case–control study using electronic primary care records
title The importance of anaemia in diagnosing colorectal cancer: a case–control study using electronic primary care records
title_full The importance of anaemia in diagnosing colorectal cancer: a case–control study using electronic primary care records
title_fullStr The importance of anaemia in diagnosing colorectal cancer: a case–control study using electronic primary care records
title_full_unstemmed The importance of anaemia in diagnosing colorectal cancer: a case–control study using electronic primary care records
title_short The importance of anaemia in diagnosing colorectal cancer: a case–control study using electronic primary care records
title_sort importance of anaemia in diagnosing colorectal cancer: a case–control study using electronic primary care records
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2361444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18219289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604165
work_keys_str_mv AT hamiltonw theimportanceofanaemiaindiagnosingcolorectalcanceracasecontrolstudyusingelectronicprimarycarerecords
AT lancashirer theimportanceofanaemiaindiagnosingcolorectalcanceracasecontrolstudyusingelectronicprimarycarerecords
AT sharpd theimportanceofanaemiaindiagnosingcolorectalcanceracasecontrolstudyusingelectronicprimarycarerecords
AT peterstj theimportanceofanaemiaindiagnosingcolorectalcanceracasecontrolstudyusingelectronicprimarycarerecords
AT chengkk theimportanceofanaemiaindiagnosingcolorectalcanceracasecontrolstudyusingelectronicprimarycarerecords
AT marshallt theimportanceofanaemiaindiagnosingcolorectalcanceracasecontrolstudyusingelectronicprimarycarerecords
AT hamiltonw importanceofanaemiaindiagnosingcolorectalcanceracasecontrolstudyusingelectronicprimarycarerecords
AT lancashirer importanceofanaemiaindiagnosingcolorectalcanceracasecontrolstudyusingelectronicprimarycarerecords
AT sharpd importanceofanaemiaindiagnosingcolorectalcanceracasecontrolstudyusingelectronicprimarycarerecords
AT peterstj importanceofanaemiaindiagnosingcolorectalcanceracasecontrolstudyusingelectronicprimarycarerecords
AT chengkk importanceofanaemiaindiagnosingcolorectalcanceracasecontrolstudyusingelectronicprimarycarerecords
AT marshallt importanceofanaemiaindiagnosingcolorectalcanceracasecontrolstudyusingelectronicprimarycarerecords