Cargando…
The importance of anaemia in diagnosing colorectal cancer: a case–control study using electronic primary care records
Although anaemia is recognised as a feature of colorectal cancer, the precise risk is unknown. We performed a case–control study using electronic primary care records from the Health Improvement Network database, UK. A total of 6442 patients had a diagnosis of colorectal cancer, and were matched to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2361444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18219289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604165 |
_version_ | 1782153212334178304 |
---|---|
author | Hamilton, W Lancashire, R Sharp, D Peters, T J Cheng, K K Marshall, T |
author_facet | Hamilton, W Lancashire, R Sharp, D Peters, T J Cheng, K K Marshall, T |
author_sort | Hamilton, W |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although anaemia is recognised as a feature of colorectal cancer, the precise risk is unknown. We performed a case–control study using electronic primary care records from the Health Improvement Network database, UK. A total of 6442 patients had a diagnosis of colorectal cancer, and were matched to 45 066 controls on age, sex, and practice. We calculated likelihood ratios and positive predictive values for colorectal cancer in both sexes across 1 g dl(−1) haemoglobin and 10-year age bands, and examined the features of iron deficiency.In men, 178 (5.2%) of 3421 cases and 47 (0.2%) of 23 928 controls had a haemoglobin <9.0 g dl(−1), giving a likelihood ratio (95% confidence interval) of 27 (19, 36). In women, the corresponding figures were 227 (7.5%) of 3021 cases and 58 (0.3%) of 21 138 controls, a likelihood ratio of 41 (30, 61). Positive predictive values increased with age and for each 1 g dl(−1) reduction in haemoglobin. The risk of cancer for current referral guidance was quantified. For men over 60 years with a haemoglobin <11 g dl(−1) and features of iron deficiency, the positive predictive value was 13.3% (9.7, 18) and for women with a haemoglobin <10 g dl(−1) and iron deficiency, the positive predictive value was 7.7% (5.7, 11). Current guidance for urgent investigation of anaemia misses some patients with a moderate risk of cancer, particularly men. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2361444 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-23614442009-09-10 The importance of anaemia in diagnosing colorectal cancer: a case–control study using electronic primary care records Hamilton, W Lancashire, R Sharp, D Peters, T J Cheng, K K Marshall, T Br J Cancer Clinical Study Although anaemia is recognised as a feature of colorectal cancer, the precise risk is unknown. We performed a case–control study using electronic primary care records from the Health Improvement Network database, UK. A total of 6442 patients had a diagnosis of colorectal cancer, and were matched to 45 066 controls on age, sex, and practice. We calculated likelihood ratios and positive predictive values for colorectal cancer in both sexes across 1 g dl(−1) haemoglobin and 10-year age bands, and examined the features of iron deficiency.In men, 178 (5.2%) of 3421 cases and 47 (0.2%) of 23 928 controls had a haemoglobin <9.0 g dl(−1), giving a likelihood ratio (95% confidence interval) of 27 (19, 36). In women, the corresponding figures were 227 (7.5%) of 3021 cases and 58 (0.3%) of 21 138 controls, a likelihood ratio of 41 (30, 61). Positive predictive values increased with age and for each 1 g dl(−1) reduction in haemoglobin. The risk of cancer for current referral guidance was quantified. For men over 60 years with a haemoglobin <11 g dl(−1) and features of iron deficiency, the positive predictive value was 13.3% (9.7, 18) and for women with a haemoglobin <10 g dl(−1) and iron deficiency, the positive predictive value was 7.7% (5.7, 11). Current guidance for urgent investigation of anaemia misses some patients with a moderate risk of cancer, particularly men. Nature Publishing Group 2008-01-29 2008-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC2361444/ /pubmed/18219289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604165 Text en Copyright © 2008 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Hamilton, W Lancashire, R Sharp, D Peters, T J Cheng, K K Marshall, T The importance of anaemia in diagnosing colorectal cancer: a case–control study using electronic primary care records |
title | The importance of anaemia in diagnosing colorectal cancer: a case–control study using electronic primary care records |
title_full | The importance of anaemia in diagnosing colorectal cancer: a case–control study using electronic primary care records |
title_fullStr | The importance of anaemia in diagnosing colorectal cancer: a case–control study using electronic primary care records |
title_full_unstemmed | The importance of anaemia in diagnosing colorectal cancer: a case–control study using electronic primary care records |
title_short | The importance of anaemia in diagnosing colorectal cancer: a case–control study using electronic primary care records |
title_sort | importance of anaemia in diagnosing colorectal cancer: a case–control study using electronic primary care records |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2361444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18219289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604165 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hamiltonw theimportanceofanaemiaindiagnosingcolorectalcanceracasecontrolstudyusingelectronicprimarycarerecords AT lancashirer theimportanceofanaemiaindiagnosingcolorectalcanceracasecontrolstudyusingelectronicprimarycarerecords AT sharpd theimportanceofanaemiaindiagnosingcolorectalcanceracasecontrolstudyusingelectronicprimarycarerecords AT peterstj theimportanceofanaemiaindiagnosingcolorectalcanceracasecontrolstudyusingelectronicprimarycarerecords AT chengkk theimportanceofanaemiaindiagnosingcolorectalcanceracasecontrolstudyusingelectronicprimarycarerecords AT marshallt theimportanceofanaemiaindiagnosingcolorectalcanceracasecontrolstudyusingelectronicprimarycarerecords AT hamiltonw importanceofanaemiaindiagnosingcolorectalcanceracasecontrolstudyusingelectronicprimarycarerecords AT lancashirer importanceofanaemiaindiagnosingcolorectalcanceracasecontrolstudyusingelectronicprimarycarerecords AT sharpd importanceofanaemiaindiagnosingcolorectalcanceracasecontrolstudyusingelectronicprimarycarerecords AT peterstj importanceofanaemiaindiagnosingcolorectalcanceracasecontrolstudyusingelectronicprimarycarerecords AT chengkk importanceofanaemiaindiagnosingcolorectalcanceracasecontrolstudyusingelectronicprimarycarerecords AT marshallt importanceofanaemiaindiagnosingcolorectalcanceracasecontrolstudyusingelectronicprimarycarerecords |