Cargando…

A new simplified comorbidity score as a prognostic factor in non-small-cell lung cancer patients: description and comparison with the Charlson's index

Treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) might take into account comorbidities as an important variable. The aim of this study was to generate a new simplified comorbidity score (SCS) and to determine whether or not it improves the possibility of predicting prognosis of NSCLC patients. A two-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Colinet, B, Jacot, W, Bertrand, D, Lacombe, S, Bozonnat, M-C, Daurès, J-P, Pujol, J-L
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2361505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16234816
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602836
_version_ 1782153227772362752
author Colinet, B
Jacot, W
Bertrand, D
Lacombe, S
Bozonnat, M-C
Daurès, J-P
Pujol, J-L
author_facet Colinet, B
Jacot, W
Bertrand, D
Lacombe, S
Bozonnat, M-C
Daurès, J-P
Pujol, J-L
author_sort Colinet, B
collection PubMed
description Treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) might take into account comorbidities as an important variable. The aim of this study was to generate a new simplified comorbidity score (SCS) and to determine whether or not it improves the possibility of predicting prognosis of NSCLC patients. A two-step methodology was used. Step 1: An SCS was developed and its prognostic value was compared with classical prognostic determinants in the outcome of 735 previously untreated NSCLC patients. Step 2: the SCS reliability as a prognostic determinant was tested in a different population of 136 prospectively accrued NSCLC patients with a formal comparison between SCS and the classical Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). Prognosis was analysed using both univariate and multivariate (Cox model) statistics. The SCS summarised the following variables: tobacco consumption, diabetes mellitus and renal insufficiency (respective weightings 7, 5 and 4), respiratory, neoplastic and cardiovascular comorbidities and alcoholism (weighting=1 for each item). In step 1, aside from classical variables such as age, stage of the disease and performance status, SCS was a statistically significant prognostic variable in univariate analyses. In the Cox model weight loss, stage grouping, performance status and SCS were independent determinants of a poor outcome. There was a trend towards statistical significance for age (P=0.08) and leucocytes count (P=0.06). In Step 2, both SCS and well-known prognostic variables were found as significant determinants in univariate analyses. There was a trend towards a negative prognostic effect for CCI. In multivariate analysis, stage grouping, performance status, histology, leucocytes, lymphocytes, lactate dehydrogenase, CYFRA 21-1 and SCS were independent determinants of a poor prognosis. CCI was removed from the Cox model. In conclusion, the SCS, constructed as an independent prognostic factor in a large NSCLC patient population, is validated in another prospective population and appears more informative than the CCI in predicting NSCLC patient outcome.
format Text
id pubmed-2361505
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23615052009-09-10 A new simplified comorbidity score as a prognostic factor in non-small-cell lung cancer patients: description and comparison with the Charlson's index Colinet, B Jacot, W Bertrand, D Lacombe, S Bozonnat, M-C Daurès, J-P Pujol, J-L Br J Cancer Clinical Study Treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) might take into account comorbidities as an important variable. The aim of this study was to generate a new simplified comorbidity score (SCS) and to determine whether or not it improves the possibility of predicting prognosis of NSCLC patients. A two-step methodology was used. Step 1: An SCS was developed and its prognostic value was compared with classical prognostic determinants in the outcome of 735 previously untreated NSCLC patients. Step 2: the SCS reliability as a prognostic determinant was tested in a different population of 136 prospectively accrued NSCLC patients with a formal comparison between SCS and the classical Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). Prognosis was analysed using both univariate and multivariate (Cox model) statistics. The SCS summarised the following variables: tobacco consumption, diabetes mellitus and renal insufficiency (respective weightings 7, 5 and 4), respiratory, neoplastic and cardiovascular comorbidities and alcoholism (weighting=1 for each item). In step 1, aside from classical variables such as age, stage of the disease and performance status, SCS was a statistically significant prognostic variable in univariate analyses. In the Cox model weight loss, stage grouping, performance status and SCS were independent determinants of a poor outcome. There was a trend towards statistical significance for age (P=0.08) and leucocytes count (P=0.06). In Step 2, both SCS and well-known prognostic variables were found as significant determinants in univariate analyses. There was a trend towards a negative prognostic effect for CCI. In multivariate analysis, stage grouping, performance status, histology, leucocytes, lymphocytes, lactate dehydrogenase, CYFRA 21-1 and SCS were independent determinants of a poor prognosis. CCI was removed from the Cox model. In conclusion, the SCS, constructed as an independent prognostic factor in a large NSCLC patient population, is validated in another prospective population and appears more informative than the CCI in predicting NSCLC patient outcome. Nature Publishing Group 2005-11-14 2005-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC2361505/ /pubmed/16234816 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602836 Text en Copyright © 2005 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Colinet, B
Jacot, W
Bertrand, D
Lacombe, S
Bozonnat, M-C
Daurès, J-P
Pujol, J-L
A new simplified comorbidity score as a prognostic factor in non-small-cell lung cancer patients: description and comparison with the Charlson's index
title A new simplified comorbidity score as a prognostic factor in non-small-cell lung cancer patients: description and comparison with the Charlson's index
title_full A new simplified comorbidity score as a prognostic factor in non-small-cell lung cancer patients: description and comparison with the Charlson's index
title_fullStr A new simplified comorbidity score as a prognostic factor in non-small-cell lung cancer patients: description and comparison with the Charlson's index
title_full_unstemmed A new simplified comorbidity score as a prognostic factor in non-small-cell lung cancer patients: description and comparison with the Charlson's index
title_short A new simplified comorbidity score as a prognostic factor in non-small-cell lung cancer patients: description and comparison with the Charlson's index
title_sort new simplified comorbidity score as a prognostic factor in non-small-cell lung cancer patients: description and comparison with the charlson's index
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2361505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16234816
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602836
work_keys_str_mv AT colinetb anewsimplifiedcomorbidityscoreasaprognosticfactorinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsdescriptionandcomparisonwiththecharlsonsindex
AT jacotw anewsimplifiedcomorbidityscoreasaprognosticfactorinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsdescriptionandcomparisonwiththecharlsonsindex
AT bertrandd anewsimplifiedcomorbidityscoreasaprognosticfactorinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsdescriptionandcomparisonwiththecharlsonsindex
AT lacombes anewsimplifiedcomorbidityscoreasaprognosticfactorinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsdescriptionandcomparisonwiththecharlsonsindex
AT bozonnatmc anewsimplifiedcomorbidityscoreasaprognosticfactorinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsdescriptionandcomparisonwiththecharlsonsindex
AT dauresjp anewsimplifiedcomorbidityscoreasaprognosticfactorinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsdescriptionandcomparisonwiththecharlsonsindex
AT pujoljl anewsimplifiedcomorbidityscoreasaprognosticfactorinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsdescriptionandcomparisonwiththecharlsonsindex
AT colinetb newsimplifiedcomorbidityscoreasaprognosticfactorinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsdescriptionandcomparisonwiththecharlsonsindex
AT jacotw newsimplifiedcomorbidityscoreasaprognosticfactorinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsdescriptionandcomparisonwiththecharlsonsindex
AT bertrandd newsimplifiedcomorbidityscoreasaprognosticfactorinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsdescriptionandcomparisonwiththecharlsonsindex
AT lacombes newsimplifiedcomorbidityscoreasaprognosticfactorinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsdescriptionandcomparisonwiththecharlsonsindex
AT bozonnatmc newsimplifiedcomorbidityscoreasaprognosticfactorinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsdescriptionandcomparisonwiththecharlsonsindex
AT dauresjp newsimplifiedcomorbidityscoreasaprognosticfactorinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsdescriptionandcomparisonwiththecharlsonsindex
AT pujoljl newsimplifiedcomorbidityscoreasaprognosticfactorinnonsmallcelllungcancerpatientsdescriptionandcomparisonwiththecharlsonsindex