Cargando…
A phase I trial of high-dose palliative radiotherapy plus concurrent weekly Vinorelbine and Cisplatin in patients with locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC
The role of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) unsuitable for radical therapy but who require locoregional treatment has not been defined. The aims of this phase I trial were thus to develop a novel regimen of weekly chemotherapy concurrent with hi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2361626/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16222311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602759 |
_version_ | 1782153260098912256 |
---|---|
author | Michael, M Wirth, A Ball, D L MacManus, M Rischin, D Mileshkin, L Solomon, B McKendrick, J Milner, A D |
author_facet | Michael, M Wirth, A Ball, D L MacManus, M Rischin, D Mileshkin, L Solomon, B McKendrick, J Milner, A D |
author_sort | Michael, M |
collection | PubMed |
description | The role of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) unsuitable for radical therapy but who require locoregional treatment has not been defined. The aims of this phase I trial were thus to develop a novel regimen of weekly chemotherapy concurrent with high-dose palliative RT (40 Gy/20 fractions) and assess its tolerability, objective and symptomatic response rates. Eligible patients had stage I–IIIB NSCLC unsuitable for radical RT or limited stage IV disease, ECOG PS⩽1 and required locoregional therapy. Treatment was RT (40 Gy/20 fractions/5 per week) and weekly Vinorelbine plus Cisplatin escalated in six planned dose levels (DLs). At 4 weeks post-RT, patients received two cycles of Cisplatin 80 mg m(−2) day 1+Vinorelbine 25 mg m(−2) days 1, 8, 15. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were defined in the CRT phase. Disease-related symptoms were assessed by the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale. In all, 24 patients accrued, stage IIIB (n=12) and IV disease (n=10). The highest administered dose was at DL 4, Vinorelbine 30 mg m(−2)+Cisplatin 20 mg m(−2) with DLTs of grade 4 neutropenia in two of three patients. No grade 3 or 4 nonhaematological toxicities were observed. The overall radiological response rate was 65% (n=23: complete response 4% and partial response 61%) and infield FDG-PET responses were seen in 89% (n=18). There was an improvement or stabilisation of symptoms and quality of life. Dose level 3, Vinorelbine 25 mg m(−2)+Cisplatin 20 mg m(−2), is recommended for further assessment. This regimen was tolerable and produced meaningful responses for patients for whom locoregional control is required, but who are unsuitable for radical CRT. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2361626 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2005 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-23616262009-09-10 A phase I trial of high-dose palliative radiotherapy plus concurrent weekly Vinorelbine and Cisplatin in patients with locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC Michael, M Wirth, A Ball, D L MacManus, M Rischin, D Mileshkin, L Solomon, B McKendrick, J Milner, A D Br J Cancer Clinical Study The role of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) unsuitable for radical therapy but who require locoregional treatment has not been defined. The aims of this phase I trial were thus to develop a novel regimen of weekly chemotherapy concurrent with high-dose palliative RT (40 Gy/20 fractions) and assess its tolerability, objective and symptomatic response rates. Eligible patients had stage I–IIIB NSCLC unsuitable for radical RT or limited stage IV disease, ECOG PS⩽1 and required locoregional therapy. Treatment was RT (40 Gy/20 fractions/5 per week) and weekly Vinorelbine plus Cisplatin escalated in six planned dose levels (DLs). At 4 weeks post-RT, patients received two cycles of Cisplatin 80 mg m(−2) day 1+Vinorelbine 25 mg m(−2) days 1, 8, 15. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were defined in the CRT phase. Disease-related symptoms were assessed by the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale. In all, 24 patients accrued, stage IIIB (n=12) and IV disease (n=10). The highest administered dose was at DL 4, Vinorelbine 30 mg m(−2)+Cisplatin 20 mg m(−2) with DLTs of grade 4 neutropenia in two of three patients. No grade 3 or 4 nonhaematological toxicities were observed. The overall radiological response rate was 65% (n=23: complete response 4% and partial response 61%) and infield FDG-PET responses were seen in 89% (n=18). There was an improvement or stabilisation of symptoms and quality of life. Dose level 3, Vinorelbine 25 mg m(−2)+Cisplatin 20 mg m(−2), is recommended for further assessment. This regimen was tolerable and produced meaningful responses for patients for whom locoregional control is required, but who are unsuitable for radical CRT. Nature Publishing Group 2005-09-19 2005-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC2361626/ /pubmed/16222311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602759 Text en Copyright © 2005 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Michael, M Wirth, A Ball, D L MacManus, M Rischin, D Mileshkin, L Solomon, B McKendrick, J Milner, A D A phase I trial of high-dose palliative radiotherapy plus concurrent weekly Vinorelbine and Cisplatin in patients with locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC |
title | A phase I trial of high-dose palliative radiotherapy plus concurrent weekly Vinorelbine and Cisplatin in patients with locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC |
title_full | A phase I trial of high-dose palliative radiotherapy plus concurrent weekly Vinorelbine and Cisplatin in patients with locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC |
title_fullStr | A phase I trial of high-dose palliative radiotherapy plus concurrent weekly Vinorelbine and Cisplatin in patients with locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC |
title_full_unstemmed | A phase I trial of high-dose palliative radiotherapy plus concurrent weekly Vinorelbine and Cisplatin in patients with locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC |
title_short | A phase I trial of high-dose palliative radiotherapy plus concurrent weekly Vinorelbine and Cisplatin in patients with locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC |
title_sort | phase i trial of high-dose palliative radiotherapy plus concurrent weekly vinorelbine and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced and metastatic nsclc |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2361626/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16222311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602759 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT michaelm aphaseitrialofhighdosepalliativeradiotherapyplusconcurrentweeklyvinorelbineandcisplatininpatientswithlocallyadvancedandmetastaticnsclc AT wirtha aphaseitrialofhighdosepalliativeradiotherapyplusconcurrentweeklyvinorelbineandcisplatininpatientswithlocallyadvancedandmetastaticnsclc AT balldl aphaseitrialofhighdosepalliativeradiotherapyplusconcurrentweeklyvinorelbineandcisplatininpatientswithlocallyadvancedandmetastaticnsclc AT macmanusm aphaseitrialofhighdosepalliativeradiotherapyplusconcurrentweeklyvinorelbineandcisplatininpatientswithlocallyadvancedandmetastaticnsclc AT rischind aphaseitrialofhighdosepalliativeradiotherapyplusconcurrentweeklyvinorelbineandcisplatininpatientswithlocallyadvancedandmetastaticnsclc AT mileshkinl aphaseitrialofhighdosepalliativeradiotherapyplusconcurrentweeklyvinorelbineandcisplatininpatientswithlocallyadvancedandmetastaticnsclc AT solomonb aphaseitrialofhighdosepalliativeradiotherapyplusconcurrentweeklyvinorelbineandcisplatininpatientswithlocallyadvancedandmetastaticnsclc AT mckendrickj aphaseitrialofhighdosepalliativeradiotherapyplusconcurrentweeklyvinorelbineandcisplatininpatientswithlocallyadvancedandmetastaticnsclc AT milnerad aphaseitrialofhighdosepalliativeradiotherapyplusconcurrentweeklyvinorelbineandcisplatininpatientswithlocallyadvancedandmetastaticnsclc AT michaelm phaseitrialofhighdosepalliativeradiotherapyplusconcurrentweeklyvinorelbineandcisplatininpatientswithlocallyadvancedandmetastaticnsclc AT wirtha phaseitrialofhighdosepalliativeradiotherapyplusconcurrentweeklyvinorelbineandcisplatininpatientswithlocallyadvancedandmetastaticnsclc AT balldl phaseitrialofhighdosepalliativeradiotherapyplusconcurrentweeklyvinorelbineandcisplatininpatientswithlocallyadvancedandmetastaticnsclc AT macmanusm phaseitrialofhighdosepalliativeradiotherapyplusconcurrentweeklyvinorelbineandcisplatininpatientswithlocallyadvancedandmetastaticnsclc AT rischind phaseitrialofhighdosepalliativeradiotherapyplusconcurrentweeklyvinorelbineandcisplatininpatientswithlocallyadvancedandmetastaticnsclc AT mileshkinl phaseitrialofhighdosepalliativeradiotherapyplusconcurrentweeklyvinorelbineandcisplatininpatientswithlocallyadvancedandmetastaticnsclc AT solomonb phaseitrialofhighdosepalliativeradiotherapyplusconcurrentweeklyvinorelbineandcisplatininpatientswithlocallyadvancedandmetastaticnsclc AT mckendrickj phaseitrialofhighdosepalliativeradiotherapyplusconcurrentweeklyvinorelbineandcisplatininpatientswithlocallyadvancedandmetastaticnsclc AT milnerad phaseitrialofhighdosepalliativeradiotherapyplusconcurrentweeklyvinorelbineandcisplatininpatientswithlocallyadvancedandmetastaticnsclc |