Cargando…

A phase II study of sequential neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus doxorubicin followed by gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with operable breast cancer: prediction of response using molecular profiling

This study examined the pathological complete response (pCR) rate and safety of sequential gemcitabine-based combinations in breast cancer. We also examined gene expression profiles from tumour biopsies to identify biomarkers predictive of response. Indian women with large or locally advanced breast...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Julka, P K, Chacko, R T, Nag, S, Parshad, R, Nair, A, Oh, D S, Hu, Z, Koppiker, C B, Nair, S, Dawar, R, Dhindsa, N, Miller, I D, Ma, D, Lin, B, Awasthy, B, Perou, C M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2361717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18382427
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604322
_version_ 1782153282231205888
author Julka, P K
Chacko, R T
Nag, S
Parshad, R
Nair, A
Oh, D S
Hu, Z
Koppiker, C B
Nair, S
Dawar, R
Dhindsa, N
Miller, I D
Ma, D
Lin, B
Awasthy, B
Perou, C M
author_facet Julka, P K
Chacko, R T
Nag, S
Parshad, R
Nair, A
Oh, D S
Hu, Z
Koppiker, C B
Nair, S
Dawar, R
Dhindsa, N
Miller, I D
Ma, D
Lin, B
Awasthy, B
Perou, C M
author_sort Julka, P K
collection PubMed
description This study examined the pathological complete response (pCR) rate and safety of sequential gemcitabine-based combinations in breast cancer. We also examined gene expression profiles from tumour biopsies to identify biomarkers predictive of response. Indian women with large or locally advanced breast cancer received 4 cycles of gemcitabine 1200 mg m(−2) plus doxorubicin 60 mg m(−2) (Gem+Dox), then 4 cycles of gemcitabine 1000 mg m(−2) plus cisplatin 70 mg m(−2) (Gem+Cis), and surgery. Three alternate dosing sequences were used during cycle 1 to examine dynamic changes in molecular profiles. Of 65 women treated, 13 (24.5% of 53 patients with surgery) had a pCR and 22 (33.8%) had a complete clinical response. Patients administered Gem d1, 8 and Dox d2 in cycle 1 (20 of 65) reported more toxicities, with G3/4 neutropenic infection/febrile neutropenia (7 of 20) as the most common cycle-1 event. Four drug-related deaths occurred. In 46 of 65 patients, 10-fold cross validated supervised analyses identified gene expression patterns that predicted with ⩾73% accuracy (1) clinical complete response after eight cycles, (2) overall clinical complete response, and (3) pCR. This regimen shows strong activity. Patients receiving Gem d1, 8 and Dox d2 experienced unacceptable toxicity, whereas patients on other sequences had manageable safety profiles. Gene expression patterns may predict benefit from gemcitabine-containing neoadjuvant therapy.
format Text
id pubmed-2361717
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23617172009-09-10 A phase II study of sequential neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus doxorubicin followed by gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with operable breast cancer: prediction of response using molecular profiling Julka, P K Chacko, R T Nag, S Parshad, R Nair, A Oh, D S Hu, Z Koppiker, C B Nair, S Dawar, R Dhindsa, N Miller, I D Ma, D Lin, B Awasthy, B Perou, C M Br J Cancer Clinical Study This study examined the pathological complete response (pCR) rate and safety of sequential gemcitabine-based combinations in breast cancer. We also examined gene expression profiles from tumour biopsies to identify biomarkers predictive of response. Indian women with large or locally advanced breast cancer received 4 cycles of gemcitabine 1200 mg m(−2) plus doxorubicin 60 mg m(−2) (Gem+Dox), then 4 cycles of gemcitabine 1000 mg m(−2) plus cisplatin 70 mg m(−2) (Gem+Cis), and surgery. Three alternate dosing sequences were used during cycle 1 to examine dynamic changes in molecular profiles. Of 65 women treated, 13 (24.5% of 53 patients with surgery) had a pCR and 22 (33.8%) had a complete clinical response. Patients administered Gem d1, 8 and Dox d2 in cycle 1 (20 of 65) reported more toxicities, with G3/4 neutropenic infection/febrile neutropenia (7 of 20) as the most common cycle-1 event. Four drug-related deaths occurred. In 46 of 65 patients, 10-fold cross validated supervised analyses identified gene expression patterns that predicted with ⩾73% accuracy (1) clinical complete response after eight cycles, (2) overall clinical complete response, and (3) pCR. This regimen shows strong activity. Patients receiving Gem d1, 8 and Dox d2 experienced unacceptable toxicity, whereas patients on other sequences had manageable safety profiles. Gene expression patterns may predict benefit from gemcitabine-containing neoadjuvant therapy. Nature Publishing Group 2008-04-22 2008-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2361717/ /pubmed/18382427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604322 Text en Copyright © 2008 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Julka, P K
Chacko, R T
Nag, S
Parshad, R
Nair, A
Oh, D S
Hu, Z
Koppiker, C B
Nair, S
Dawar, R
Dhindsa, N
Miller, I D
Ma, D
Lin, B
Awasthy, B
Perou, C M
A phase II study of sequential neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus doxorubicin followed by gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with operable breast cancer: prediction of response using molecular profiling
title A phase II study of sequential neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus doxorubicin followed by gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with operable breast cancer: prediction of response using molecular profiling
title_full A phase II study of sequential neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus doxorubicin followed by gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with operable breast cancer: prediction of response using molecular profiling
title_fullStr A phase II study of sequential neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus doxorubicin followed by gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with operable breast cancer: prediction of response using molecular profiling
title_full_unstemmed A phase II study of sequential neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus doxorubicin followed by gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with operable breast cancer: prediction of response using molecular profiling
title_short A phase II study of sequential neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus doxorubicin followed by gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with operable breast cancer: prediction of response using molecular profiling
title_sort phase ii study of sequential neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus doxorubicin followed by gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with operable breast cancer: prediction of response using molecular profiling
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2361717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18382427
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604322
work_keys_str_mv AT julkapk aphaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling
AT chackort aphaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling
AT nags aphaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling
AT parshadr aphaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling
AT naira aphaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling
AT ohds aphaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling
AT huz aphaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling
AT koppikercb aphaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling
AT nairs aphaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling
AT dawarr aphaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling
AT dhindsan aphaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling
AT millerid aphaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling
AT mad aphaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling
AT linb aphaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling
AT awasthyb aphaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling
AT peroucm aphaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling
AT julkapk phaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling
AT chackort phaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling
AT nags phaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling
AT parshadr phaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling
AT naira phaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling
AT ohds phaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling
AT huz phaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling
AT koppikercb phaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling
AT nairs phaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling
AT dawarr phaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling
AT dhindsan phaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling
AT millerid phaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling
AT mad phaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling
AT linb phaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling
AT awasthyb phaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling
AT peroucm phaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling