Cargando…
A phase II study of sequential neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus doxorubicin followed by gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with operable breast cancer: prediction of response using molecular profiling
This study examined the pathological complete response (pCR) rate and safety of sequential gemcitabine-based combinations in breast cancer. We also examined gene expression profiles from tumour biopsies to identify biomarkers predictive of response. Indian women with large or locally advanced breast...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2361717/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18382427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604322 |
_version_ | 1782153282231205888 |
---|---|
author | Julka, P K Chacko, R T Nag, S Parshad, R Nair, A Oh, D S Hu, Z Koppiker, C B Nair, S Dawar, R Dhindsa, N Miller, I D Ma, D Lin, B Awasthy, B Perou, C M |
author_facet | Julka, P K Chacko, R T Nag, S Parshad, R Nair, A Oh, D S Hu, Z Koppiker, C B Nair, S Dawar, R Dhindsa, N Miller, I D Ma, D Lin, B Awasthy, B Perou, C M |
author_sort | Julka, P K |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study examined the pathological complete response (pCR) rate and safety of sequential gemcitabine-based combinations in breast cancer. We also examined gene expression profiles from tumour biopsies to identify biomarkers predictive of response. Indian women with large or locally advanced breast cancer received 4 cycles of gemcitabine 1200 mg m(−2) plus doxorubicin 60 mg m(−2) (Gem+Dox), then 4 cycles of gemcitabine 1000 mg m(−2) plus cisplatin 70 mg m(−2) (Gem+Cis), and surgery. Three alternate dosing sequences were used during cycle 1 to examine dynamic changes in molecular profiles. Of 65 women treated, 13 (24.5% of 53 patients with surgery) had a pCR and 22 (33.8%) had a complete clinical response. Patients administered Gem d1, 8 and Dox d2 in cycle 1 (20 of 65) reported more toxicities, with G3/4 neutropenic infection/febrile neutropenia (7 of 20) as the most common cycle-1 event. Four drug-related deaths occurred. In 46 of 65 patients, 10-fold cross validated supervised analyses identified gene expression patterns that predicted with ⩾73% accuracy (1) clinical complete response after eight cycles, (2) overall clinical complete response, and (3) pCR. This regimen shows strong activity. Patients receiving Gem d1, 8 and Dox d2 experienced unacceptable toxicity, whereas patients on other sequences had manageable safety profiles. Gene expression patterns may predict benefit from gemcitabine-containing neoadjuvant therapy. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2361717 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-23617172009-09-10 A phase II study of sequential neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus doxorubicin followed by gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with operable breast cancer: prediction of response using molecular profiling Julka, P K Chacko, R T Nag, S Parshad, R Nair, A Oh, D S Hu, Z Koppiker, C B Nair, S Dawar, R Dhindsa, N Miller, I D Ma, D Lin, B Awasthy, B Perou, C M Br J Cancer Clinical Study This study examined the pathological complete response (pCR) rate and safety of sequential gemcitabine-based combinations in breast cancer. We also examined gene expression profiles from tumour biopsies to identify biomarkers predictive of response. Indian women with large or locally advanced breast cancer received 4 cycles of gemcitabine 1200 mg m(−2) plus doxorubicin 60 mg m(−2) (Gem+Dox), then 4 cycles of gemcitabine 1000 mg m(−2) plus cisplatin 70 mg m(−2) (Gem+Cis), and surgery. Three alternate dosing sequences were used during cycle 1 to examine dynamic changes in molecular profiles. Of 65 women treated, 13 (24.5% of 53 patients with surgery) had a pCR and 22 (33.8%) had a complete clinical response. Patients administered Gem d1, 8 and Dox d2 in cycle 1 (20 of 65) reported more toxicities, with G3/4 neutropenic infection/febrile neutropenia (7 of 20) as the most common cycle-1 event. Four drug-related deaths occurred. In 46 of 65 patients, 10-fold cross validated supervised analyses identified gene expression patterns that predicted with ⩾73% accuracy (1) clinical complete response after eight cycles, (2) overall clinical complete response, and (3) pCR. This regimen shows strong activity. Patients receiving Gem d1, 8 and Dox d2 experienced unacceptable toxicity, whereas patients on other sequences had manageable safety profiles. Gene expression patterns may predict benefit from gemcitabine-containing neoadjuvant therapy. Nature Publishing Group 2008-04-22 2008-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC2361717/ /pubmed/18382427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604322 Text en Copyright © 2008 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Julka, P K Chacko, R T Nag, S Parshad, R Nair, A Oh, D S Hu, Z Koppiker, C B Nair, S Dawar, R Dhindsa, N Miller, I D Ma, D Lin, B Awasthy, B Perou, C M A phase II study of sequential neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus doxorubicin followed by gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with operable breast cancer: prediction of response using molecular profiling |
title | A phase II study of sequential neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus doxorubicin followed by gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with operable breast cancer: prediction of response using molecular profiling |
title_full | A phase II study of sequential neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus doxorubicin followed by gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with operable breast cancer: prediction of response using molecular profiling |
title_fullStr | A phase II study of sequential neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus doxorubicin followed by gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with operable breast cancer: prediction of response using molecular profiling |
title_full_unstemmed | A phase II study of sequential neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus doxorubicin followed by gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with operable breast cancer: prediction of response using molecular profiling |
title_short | A phase II study of sequential neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus doxorubicin followed by gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with operable breast cancer: prediction of response using molecular profiling |
title_sort | phase ii study of sequential neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus doxorubicin followed by gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with operable breast cancer: prediction of response using molecular profiling |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2361717/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18382427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604322 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT julkapk aphaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling AT chackort aphaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling AT nags aphaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling AT parshadr aphaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling AT naira aphaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling AT ohds aphaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling AT huz aphaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling AT koppikercb aphaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling AT nairs aphaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling AT dawarr aphaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling AT dhindsan aphaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling AT millerid aphaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling AT mad aphaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling AT linb aphaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling AT awasthyb aphaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling AT peroucm aphaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling AT julkapk phaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling AT chackort phaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling AT nags phaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling AT parshadr phaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling AT naira phaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling AT ohds phaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling AT huz phaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling AT koppikercb phaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling AT nairs phaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling AT dawarr phaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling AT dhindsan phaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling AT millerid phaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling AT mad phaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling AT linb phaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling AT awasthyb phaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling AT peroucm phaseiistudyofsequentialneoadjuvantgemcitabineplusdoxorubicinfollowedbygemcitabinepluscisplatininpatientswithoperablebreastcancerpredictionofresponseusingmolecularprofiling |