Cargando…
Cisplatin plus oral etoposide (EoP) combination is more effective than paclitaxel in patients with advanced breast cancer pretreated with anthracyclines: a randomised phase III trial of Turkish Oncology Group
Our objective was to determine whether oral etoposide and cisplatin combination (EoP) is superior to paclitaxel in the treatment of advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients pretreated with anthracyclines. From December 1997 to August 2003, 201 patients were randomised, 100 to EoP and 101 to paclitaxel...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2361864/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15726120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602388 |
_version_ | 1782153318784565248 |
---|---|
author | Icli, F Akbulut, H Uner, A Yalcin, B Baltali, E Altinbas, M Coşkun, Ş Komurcu, S Erkisi, M Demirkazik, A Senler, F C Sencan, O Büyükcelik, A Boruban, C Onur, H Zengin, N Sak, S D |
author_facet | Icli, F Akbulut, H Uner, A Yalcin, B Baltali, E Altinbas, M Coşkun, Ş Komurcu, S Erkisi, M Demirkazik, A Senler, F C Sencan, O Büyükcelik, A Boruban, C Onur, H Zengin, N Sak, S D |
author_sort | Icli, F |
collection | PubMed |
description | Our objective was to determine whether oral etoposide and cisplatin combination (EoP) is superior to paclitaxel in the treatment of advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients pretreated with anthracyclines. From December 1997 to August 2003, 201 patients were randomised, 100 to EoP and 101 to paclitaxel arms. Four patients in each arm were ineligible. The doses of etoposide and cisplatin were 50 mg p.o. twice a day for 7 days and 70 mg m(−2) intravenously (i.v.) on day 1, respectively, and it was 175 mg m(−2) on day 1 for paclitaxel. Both treatments were repeated every 3 weeks. A median of four cycles of study treatment was given in both arms. The response rate obtained in the EoP arm was significantly higher (36.3 vs 22.2%; P=0.038). Median response duration was longer for the EoP arm (7 vs 4 months) (P=0.132). Also, time to progression was significantly in favour of the EoP arm (5.5 vs 3.9 months; P=0.003). Median overall survival was again significantly longer in the EoP arm (14 vs 9.5 months; P=0.039). Toxicity profile of both groups was similar. Two patients in each arm were lost due to febrile neutropenia. The observed activity and acceptable toxicity of EoP endorses the employment of this combination in the treatment of ABC following anthracyclines. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2361864 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2005 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-23618642009-09-10 Cisplatin plus oral etoposide (EoP) combination is more effective than paclitaxel in patients with advanced breast cancer pretreated with anthracyclines: a randomised phase III trial of Turkish Oncology Group Icli, F Akbulut, H Uner, A Yalcin, B Baltali, E Altinbas, M Coşkun, Ş Komurcu, S Erkisi, M Demirkazik, A Senler, F C Sencan, O Büyükcelik, A Boruban, C Onur, H Zengin, N Sak, S D Br J Cancer Clinical Study Our objective was to determine whether oral etoposide and cisplatin combination (EoP) is superior to paclitaxel in the treatment of advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients pretreated with anthracyclines. From December 1997 to August 2003, 201 patients were randomised, 100 to EoP and 101 to paclitaxel arms. Four patients in each arm were ineligible. The doses of etoposide and cisplatin were 50 mg p.o. twice a day for 7 days and 70 mg m(−2) intravenously (i.v.) on day 1, respectively, and it was 175 mg m(−2) on day 1 for paclitaxel. Both treatments were repeated every 3 weeks. A median of four cycles of study treatment was given in both arms. The response rate obtained in the EoP arm was significantly higher (36.3 vs 22.2%; P=0.038). Median response duration was longer for the EoP arm (7 vs 4 months) (P=0.132). Also, time to progression was significantly in favour of the EoP arm (5.5 vs 3.9 months; P=0.003). Median overall survival was again significantly longer in the EoP arm (14 vs 9.5 months; P=0.039). Toxicity profile of both groups was similar. Two patients in each arm were lost due to febrile neutropenia. The observed activity and acceptable toxicity of EoP endorses the employment of this combination in the treatment of ABC following anthracyclines. Nature Publishing Group 2005-02-28 2005-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC2361864/ /pubmed/15726120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602388 Text en Copyright © 2005 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Icli, F Akbulut, H Uner, A Yalcin, B Baltali, E Altinbas, M Coşkun, Ş Komurcu, S Erkisi, M Demirkazik, A Senler, F C Sencan, O Büyükcelik, A Boruban, C Onur, H Zengin, N Sak, S D Cisplatin plus oral etoposide (EoP) combination is more effective than paclitaxel in patients with advanced breast cancer pretreated with anthracyclines: a randomised phase III trial of Turkish Oncology Group |
title | Cisplatin plus oral etoposide (EoP) combination is more effective than paclitaxel in patients with advanced breast cancer pretreated with anthracyclines: a randomised phase III trial of Turkish Oncology Group |
title_full | Cisplatin plus oral etoposide (EoP) combination is more effective than paclitaxel in patients with advanced breast cancer pretreated with anthracyclines: a randomised phase III trial of Turkish Oncology Group |
title_fullStr | Cisplatin plus oral etoposide (EoP) combination is more effective than paclitaxel in patients with advanced breast cancer pretreated with anthracyclines: a randomised phase III trial of Turkish Oncology Group |
title_full_unstemmed | Cisplatin plus oral etoposide (EoP) combination is more effective than paclitaxel in patients with advanced breast cancer pretreated with anthracyclines: a randomised phase III trial of Turkish Oncology Group |
title_short | Cisplatin plus oral etoposide (EoP) combination is more effective than paclitaxel in patients with advanced breast cancer pretreated with anthracyclines: a randomised phase III trial of Turkish Oncology Group |
title_sort | cisplatin plus oral etoposide (eop) combination is more effective than paclitaxel in patients with advanced breast cancer pretreated with anthracyclines: a randomised phase iii trial of turkish oncology group |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2361864/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15726120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602388 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT iclif cisplatinplusoraletoposideeopcombinationismoreeffectivethanpaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedbreastcancerpretreatedwithanthracyclinesarandomisedphaseiiitrialofturkishoncologygroup AT akbuluth cisplatinplusoraletoposideeopcombinationismoreeffectivethanpaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedbreastcancerpretreatedwithanthracyclinesarandomisedphaseiiitrialofturkishoncologygroup AT unera cisplatinplusoraletoposideeopcombinationismoreeffectivethanpaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedbreastcancerpretreatedwithanthracyclinesarandomisedphaseiiitrialofturkishoncologygroup AT yalcinb cisplatinplusoraletoposideeopcombinationismoreeffectivethanpaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedbreastcancerpretreatedwithanthracyclinesarandomisedphaseiiitrialofturkishoncologygroup AT baltalie cisplatinplusoraletoposideeopcombinationismoreeffectivethanpaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedbreastcancerpretreatedwithanthracyclinesarandomisedphaseiiitrialofturkishoncologygroup AT altinbasm cisplatinplusoraletoposideeopcombinationismoreeffectivethanpaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedbreastcancerpretreatedwithanthracyclinesarandomisedphaseiiitrialofturkishoncologygroup AT coskuns cisplatinplusoraletoposideeopcombinationismoreeffectivethanpaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedbreastcancerpretreatedwithanthracyclinesarandomisedphaseiiitrialofturkishoncologygroup AT komurcus cisplatinplusoraletoposideeopcombinationismoreeffectivethanpaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedbreastcancerpretreatedwithanthracyclinesarandomisedphaseiiitrialofturkishoncologygroup AT erkisim cisplatinplusoraletoposideeopcombinationismoreeffectivethanpaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedbreastcancerpretreatedwithanthracyclinesarandomisedphaseiiitrialofturkishoncologygroup AT demirkazika cisplatinplusoraletoposideeopcombinationismoreeffectivethanpaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedbreastcancerpretreatedwithanthracyclinesarandomisedphaseiiitrialofturkishoncologygroup AT senlerfc cisplatinplusoraletoposideeopcombinationismoreeffectivethanpaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedbreastcancerpretreatedwithanthracyclinesarandomisedphaseiiitrialofturkishoncologygroup AT sencano cisplatinplusoraletoposideeopcombinationismoreeffectivethanpaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedbreastcancerpretreatedwithanthracyclinesarandomisedphaseiiitrialofturkishoncologygroup AT buyukcelika cisplatinplusoraletoposideeopcombinationismoreeffectivethanpaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedbreastcancerpretreatedwithanthracyclinesarandomisedphaseiiitrialofturkishoncologygroup AT borubanc cisplatinplusoraletoposideeopcombinationismoreeffectivethanpaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedbreastcancerpretreatedwithanthracyclinesarandomisedphaseiiitrialofturkishoncologygroup AT onurh cisplatinplusoraletoposideeopcombinationismoreeffectivethanpaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedbreastcancerpretreatedwithanthracyclinesarandomisedphaseiiitrialofturkishoncologygroup AT zenginn cisplatinplusoraletoposideeopcombinationismoreeffectivethanpaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedbreastcancerpretreatedwithanthracyclinesarandomisedphaseiiitrialofturkishoncologygroup AT saksd cisplatinplusoraletoposideeopcombinationismoreeffectivethanpaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedbreastcancerpretreatedwithanthracyclinesarandomisedphaseiiitrialofturkishoncologygroup |