Cargando…

Cisplatin plus oral etoposide (EoP) combination is more effective than paclitaxel in patients with advanced breast cancer pretreated with anthracyclines: a randomised phase III trial of Turkish Oncology Group

Our objective was to determine whether oral etoposide and cisplatin combination (EoP) is superior to paclitaxel in the treatment of advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients pretreated with anthracyclines. From December 1997 to August 2003, 201 patients were randomised, 100 to EoP and 101 to paclitaxel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Icli, F, Akbulut, H, Uner, A, Yalcin, B, Baltali, E, Altinbas, M, Coşkun, Ş, Komurcu, S, Erkisi, M, Demirkazik, A, Senler, F C, Sencan, O, Büyükcelik, A, Boruban, C, Onur, H, Zengin, N, Sak, S D
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2361864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15726120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602388
_version_ 1782153318784565248
author Icli, F
Akbulut, H
Uner, A
Yalcin, B
Baltali, E
Altinbas, M
Coşkun, Ş
Komurcu, S
Erkisi, M
Demirkazik, A
Senler, F C
Sencan, O
Büyükcelik, A
Boruban, C
Onur, H
Zengin, N
Sak, S D
author_facet Icli, F
Akbulut, H
Uner, A
Yalcin, B
Baltali, E
Altinbas, M
Coşkun, Ş
Komurcu, S
Erkisi, M
Demirkazik, A
Senler, F C
Sencan, O
Büyükcelik, A
Boruban, C
Onur, H
Zengin, N
Sak, S D
author_sort Icli, F
collection PubMed
description Our objective was to determine whether oral etoposide and cisplatin combination (EoP) is superior to paclitaxel in the treatment of advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients pretreated with anthracyclines. From December 1997 to August 2003, 201 patients were randomised, 100 to EoP and 101 to paclitaxel arms. Four patients in each arm were ineligible. The doses of etoposide and cisplatin were 50 mg p.o. twice a day for 7 days and 70 mg m(−2) intravenously (i.v.) on day 1, respectively, and it was 175 mg m(−2) on day 1 for paclitaxel. Both treatments were repeated every 3 weeks. A median of four cycles of study treatment was given in both arms. The response rate obtained in the EoP arm was significantly higher (36.3 vs 22.2%; P=0.038). Median response duration was longer for the EoP arm (7 vs 4 months) (P=0.132). Also, time to progression was significantly in favour of the EoP arm (5.5 vs 3.9 months; P=0.003). Median overall survival was again significantly longer in the EoP arm (14 vs 9.5 months; P=0.039). Toxicity profile of both groups was similar. Two patients in each arm were lost due to febrile neutropenia. The observed activity and acceptable toxicity of EoP endorses the employment of this combination in the treatment of ABC following anthracyclines.
format Text
id pubmed-2361864
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23618642009-09-10 Cisplatin plus oral etoposide (EoP) combination is more effective than paclitaxel in patients with advanced breast cancer pretreated with anthracyclines: a randomised phase III trial of Turkish Oncology Group Icli, F Akbulut, H Uner, A Yalcin, B Baltali, E Altinbas, M Coşkun, Ş Komurcu, S Erkisi, M Demirkazik, A Senler, F C Sencan, O Büyükcelik, A Boruban, C Onur, H Zengin, N Sak, S D Br J Cancer Clinical Study Our objective was to determine whether oral etoposide and cisplatin combination (EoP) is superior to paclitaxel in the treatment of advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients pretreated with anthracyclines. From December 1997 to August 2003, 201 patients were randomised, 100 to EoP and 101 to paclitaxel arms. Four patients in each arm were ineligible. The doses of etoposide and cisplatin were 50 mg p.o. twice a day for 7 days and 70 mg m(−2) intravenously (i.v.) on day 1, respectively, and it was 175 mg m(−2) on day 1 for paclitaxel. Both treatments were repeated every 3 weeks. A median of four cycles of study treatment was given in both arms. The response rate obtained in the EoP arm was significantly higher (36.3 vs 22.2%; P=0.038). Median response duration was longer for the EoP arm (7 vs 4 months) (P=0.132). Also, time to progression was significantly in favour of the EoP arm (5.5 vs 3.9 months; P=0.003). Median overall survival was again significantly longer in the EoP arm (14 vs 9.5 months; P=0.039). Toxicity profile of both groups was similar. Two patients in each arm were lost due to febrile neutropenia. The observed activity and acceptable toxicity of EoP endorses the employment of this combination in the treatment of ABC following anthracyclines. Nature Publishing Group 2005-02-28 2005-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC2361864/ /pubmed/15726120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602388 Text en Copyright © 2005 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Icli, F
Akbulut, H
Uner, A
Yalcin, B
Baltali, E
Altinbas, M
Coşkun, Ş
Komurcu, S
Erkisi, M
Demirkazik, A
Senler, F C
Sencan, O
Büyükcelik, A
Boruban, C
Onur, H
Zengin, N
Sak, S D
Cisplatin plus oral etoposide (EoP) combination is more effective than paclitaxel in patients with advanced breast cancer pretreated with anthracyclines: a randomised phase III trial of Turkish Oncology Group
title Cisplatin plus oral etoposide (EoP) combination is more effective than paclitaxel in patients with advanced breast cancer pretreated with anthracyclines: a randomised phase III trial of Turkish Oncology Group
title_full Cisplatin plus oral etoposide (EoP) combination is more effective than paclitaxel in patients with advanced breast cancer pretreated with anthracyclines: a randomised phase III trial of Turkish Oncology Group
title_fullStr Cisplatin plus oral etoposide (EoP) combination is more effective than paclitaxel in patients with advanced breast cancer pretreated with anthracyclines: a randomised phase III trial of Turkish Oncology Group
title_full_unstemmed Cisplatin plus oral etoposide (EoP) combination is more effective than paclitaxel in patients with advanced breast cancer pretreated with anthracyclines: a randomised phase III trial of Turkish Oncology Group
title_short Cisplatin plus oral etoposide (EoP) combination is more effective than paclitaxel in patients with advanced breast cancer pretreated with anthracyclines: a randomised phase III trial of Turkish Oncology Group
title_sort cisplatin plus oral etoposide (eop) combination is more effective than paclitaxel in patients with advanced breast cancer pretreated with anthracyclines: a randomised phase iii trial of turkish oncology group
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2361864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15726120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602388
work_keys_str_mv AT iclif cisplatinplusoraletoposideeopcombinationismoreeffectivethanpaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedbreastcancerpretreatedwithanthracyclinesarandomisedphaseiiitrialofturkishoncologygroup
AT akbuluth cisplatinplusoraletoposideeopcombinationismoreeffectivethanpaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedbreastcancerpretreatedwithanthracyclinesarandomisedphaseiiitrialofturkishoncologygroup
AT unera cisplatinplusoraletoposideeopcombinationismoreeffectivethanpaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedbreastcancerpretreatedwithanthracyclinesarandomisedphaseiiitrialofturkishoncologygroup
AT yalcinb cisplatinplusoraletoposideeopcombinationismoreeffectivethanpaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedbreastcancerpretreatedwithanthracyclinesarandomisedphaseiiitrialofturkishoncologygroup
AT baltalie cisplatinplusoraletoposideeopcombinationismoreeffectivethanpaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedbreastcancerpretreatedwithanthracyclinesarandomisedphaseiiitrialofturkishoncologygroup
AT altinbasm cisplatinplusoraletoposideeopcombinationismoreeffectivethanpaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedbreastcancerpretreatedwithanthracyclinesarandomisedphaseiiitrialofturkishoncologygroup
AT coskuns cisplatinplusoraletoposideeopcombinationismoreeffectivethanpaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedbreastcancerpretreatedwithanthracyclinesarandomisedphaseiiitrialofturkishoncologygroup
AT komurcus cisplatinplusoraletoposideeopcombinationismoreeffectivethanpaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedbreastcancerpretreatedwithanthracyclinesarandomisedphaseiiitrialofturkishoncologygroup
AT erkisim cisplatinplusoraletoposideeopcombinationismoreeffectivethanpaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedbreastcancerpretreatedwithanthracyclinesarandomisedphaseiiitrialofturkishoncologygroup
AT demirkazika cisplatinplusoraletoposideeopcombinationismoreeffectivethanpaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedbreastcancerpretreatedwithanthracyclinesarandomisedphaseiiitrialofturkishoncologygroup
AT senlerfc cisplatinplusoraletoposideeopcombinationismoreeffectivethanpaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedbreastcancerpretreatedwithanthracyclinesarandomisedphaseiiitrialofturkishoncologygroup
AT sencano cisplatinplusoraletoposideeopcombinationismoreeffectivethanpaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedbreastcancerpretreatedwithanthracyclinesarandomisedphaseiiitrialofturkishoncologygroup
AT buyukcelika cisplatinplusoraletoposideeopcombinationismoreeffectivethanpaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedbreastcancerpretreatedwithanthracyclinesarandomisedphaseiiitrialofturkishoncologygroup
AT borubanc cisplatinplusoraletoposideeopcombinationismoreeffectivethanpaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedbreastcancerpretreatedwithanthracyclinesarandomisedphaseiiitrialofturkishoncologygroup
AT onurh cisplatinplusoraletoposideeopcombinationismoreeffectivethanpaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedbreastcancerpretreatedwithanthracyclinesarandomisedphaseiiitrialofturkishoncologygroup
AT zenginn cisplatinplusoraletoposideeopcombinationismoreeffectivethanpaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedbreastcancerpretreatedwithanthracyclinesarandomisedphaseiiitrialofturkishoncologygroup
AT saksd cisplatinplusoraletoposideeopcombinationismoreeffectivethanpaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedbreastcancerpretreatedwithanthracyclinesarandomisedphaseiiitrialofturkishoncologygroup