The preferences of 600 patients for different descriptions of randomisation

A total of 600 patients from cancer centres throughout the UK identified their most preferred and most disliked descriptions of randomisation found in current patient information sheets and websites. The CancerBACUP description, which describes both the process of randomisation and why it is done, w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jenkins, V, Fallowfield, L, Cox, A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2005
Materias:
Short Communication
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2361925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15726098
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602445
_version_ 1782153334893838336
author Jenkins, V
Fallowfield, L
Cox, A
author_facet Jenkins, V
Fallowfield, L
Cox, A
author_sort Jenkins, V
collection PubMed
description A total of 600 patients from cancer centres throughout the UK identified their most preferred and most disliked descriptions of randomisation found in current patient information sheets and websites. The CancerBACUP description, which describes both the process of randomisation and why it is done, was most preferred 151 out of 533 (28%) patients. The NCI description was viewed as overly technical and most disliked 185 out of 483 (38%) patients.
format Text
id pubmed-2361925
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23619252009-09-10 The preferences of 600 patients for different descriptions of randomisation Jenkins, V Fallowfield, L Cox, A Br J Cancer Short Communication A total of 600 patients from cancer centres throughout the UK identified their most preferred and most disliked descriptions of randomisation found in current patient information sheets and websites. The CancerBACUP description, which describes both the process of randomisation and why it is done, was most preferred 151 out of 533 (28%) patients. The NCI description was viewed as overly technical and most disliked 185 out of 483 (38%) patients. Nature Publishing Group 2005-03-14 2005-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC2361925/ /pubmed/15726098 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602445 Text en Copyright © 2005 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Short Communication
Jenkins, V
Fallowfield, L
Cox, A
The preferences of 600 patients for different descriptions of randomisation
title The preferences of 600 patients for different descriptions of randomisation
title_full The preferences of 600 patients for different descriptions of randomisation
title_fullStr The preferences of 600 patients for different descriptions of randomisation
title_full_unstemmed The preferences of 600 patients for different descriptions of randomisation
title_short The preferences of 600 patients for different descriptions of randomisation
title_sort preferences of 600 patients for different descriptions of randomisation
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2361925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15726098
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602445
work_keys_str_mv AT jenkinsv thepreferencesof600patientsfordifferentdescriptionsofrandomisation
AT fallowfieldl thepreferencesof600patientsfordifferentdescriptionsofrandomisation
AT coxa thepreferencesof600patientsfordifferentdescriptionsofrandomisation
AT jenkinsv preferencesof600patientsfordifferentdescriptionsofrandomisation
AT fallowfieldl preferencesof600patientsfordifferentdescriptionsofrandomisation
AT coxa preferencesof600patientsfordifferentdescriptionsofrandomisation

Ejemplares similares