Cargando…

Histopathologic indicators of breast cancer biology: insights from population mammographic screening

Histopathologic features of breast cancer such as tumour size, grade and axillary lymph node (LN) status variably reflect tumour biology and time. Recent evidence suggests that the biological character of breast cancer is established at an early stage and has a major impact on clinical course. The a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Webster, L R, Bilous, A M, Willis, L, Byth, K, Burgemeister, F C, Salisbury, E L C, Clarke, C L, Balleine, R L
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2362010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15812557
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602501
_version_ 1782153356780765184
author Webster, L R
Bilous, A M
Willis, L
Byth, K
Burgemeister, F C
Salisbury, E L C
Clarke, C L
Balleine, R L
author_facet Webster, L R
Bilous, A M
Willis, L
Byth, K
Burgemeister, F C
Salisbury, E L C
Clarke, C L
Balleine, R L
author_sort Webster, L R
collection PubMed
description Histopathologic features of breast cancer such as tumour size, grade and axillary lymph node (LN) status variably reflect tumour biology and time. Recent evidence suggests that the biological character of breast cancer is established at an early stage and has a major impact on clinical course. The aim of this study was to distinguish the impact of biology on breast cancer histopathology by comparing features of breast cancers diagnosed following population mammographic screening with prevalent vs incident detection and screening interval. Central histopathology review data from 1147 cases of ductal in situ and/or invasive breast cancer were examined. Size, grade and LN status of invasive cancers were positively correlated (P<0.001). Prevalent invasive cancers were larger (P<0.001) and more likely to be LN positive (P=0.02) than incident cases, but grade was not associated with screening episode (P=0.7). Screening interval for incident cancers was positively associated with invasive cancer size (P=0.05) and LN status (P=0.002) but not grade (P=0.1). Together, these data indicate that biology and time both impact on size and LN status of invasive breast cancer, but grade reflects biology alone. In view of the clinical importance of breast cancer biology, grade as its most direct indicator assumes particular significance.
format Text
id pubmed-2362010
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23620102009-09-10 Histopathologic indicators of breast cancer biology: insights from population mammographic screening Webster, L R Bilous, A M Willis, L Byth, K Burgemeister, F C Salisbury, E L C Clarke, C L Balleine, R L Br J Cancer Clinical Study Histopathologic features of breast cancer such as tumour size, grade and axillary lymph node (LN) status variably reflect tumour biology and time. Recent evidence suggests that the biological character of breast cancer is established at an early stage and has a major impact on clinical course. The aim of this study was to distinguish the impact of biology on breast cancer histopathology by comparing features of breast cancers diagnosed following population mammographic screening with prevalent vs incident detection and screening interval. Central histopathology review data from 1147 cases of ductal in situ and/or invasive breast cancer were examined. Size, grade and LN status of invasive cancers were positively correlated (P<0.001). Prevalent invasive cancers were larger (P<0.001) and more likely to be LN positive (P=0.02) than incident cases, but grade was not associated with screening episode (P=0.7). Screening interval for incident cancers was positively associated with invasive cancer size (P=0.05) and LN status (P=0.002) but not grade (P=0.1). Together, these data indicate that biology and time both impact on size and LN status of invasive breast cancer, but grade reflects biology alone. In view of the clinical importance of breast cancer biology, grade as its most direct indicator assumes particular significance. Nature Publishing Group 2005-04-25 2005-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2362010/ /pubmed/15812557 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602501 Text en Copyright © 2005 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Webster, L R
Bilous, A M
Willis, L
Byth, K
Burgemeister, F C
Salisbury, E L C
Clarke, C L
Balleine, R L
Histopathologic indicators of breast cancer biology: insights from population mammographic screening
title Histopathologic indicators of breast cancer biology: insights from population mammographic screening
title_full Histopathologic indicators of breast cancer biology: insights from population mammographic screening
title_fullStr Histopathologic indicators of breast cancer biology: insights from population mammographic screening
title_full_unstemmed Histopathologic indicators of breast cancer biology: insights from population mammographic screening
title_short Histopathologic indicators of breast cancer biology: insights from population mammographic screening
title_sort histopathologic indicators of breast cancer biology: insights from population mammographic screening
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2362010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15812557
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602501
work_keys_str_mv AT websterlr histopathologicindicatorsofbreastcancerbiologyinsightsfrompopulationmammographicscreening
AT bilousam histopathologicindicatorsofbreastcancerbiologyinsightsfrompopulationmammographicscreening
AT willisl histopathologicindicatorsofbreastcancerbiologyinsightsfrompopulationmammographicscreening
AT bythk histopathologicindicatorsofbreastcancerbiologyinsightsfrompopulationmammographicscreening
AT burgemeisterfc histopathologicindicatorsofbreastcancerbiologyinsightsfrompopulationmammographicscreening
AT salisburyelc histopathologicindicatorsofbreastcancerbiologyinsightsfrompopulationmammographicscreening
AT clarkecl histopathologicindicatorsofbreastcancerbiologyinsightsfrompopulationmammographicscreening
AT balleinerl histopathologicindicatorsofbreastcancerbiologyinsightsfrompopulationmammographicscreening