Cargando…
Histopathologic indicators of breast cancer biology: insights from population mammographic screening
Histopathologic features of breast cancer such as tumour size, grade and axillary lymph node (LN) status variably reflect tumour biology and time. Recent evidence suggests that the biological character of breast cancer is established at an early stage and has a major impact on clinical course. The a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2362010/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15812557 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602501 |
_version_ | 1782153356780765184 |
---|---|
author | Webster, L R Bilous, A M Willis, L Byth, K Burgemeister, F C Salisbury, E L C Clarke, C L Balleine, R L |
author_facet | Webster, L R Bilous, A M Willis, L Byth, K Burgemeister, F C Salisbury, E L C Clarke, C L Balleine, R L |
author_sort | Webster, L R |
collection | PubMed |
description | Histopathologic features of breast cancer such as tumour size, grade and axillary lymph node (LN) status variably reflect tumour biology and time. Recent evidence suggests that the biological character of breast cancer is established at an early stage and has a major impact on clinical course. The aim of this study was to distinguish the impact of biology on breast cancer histopathology by comparing features of breast cancers diagnosed following population mammographic screening with prevalent vs incident detection and screening interval. Central histopathology review data from 1147 cases of ductal in situ and/or invasive breast cancer were examined. Size, grade and LN status of invasive cancers were positively correlated (P<0.001). Prevalent invasive cancers were larger (P<0.001) and more likely to be LN positive (P=0.02) than incident cases, but grade was not associated with screening episode (P=0.7). Screening interval for incident cancers was positively associated with invasive cancer size (P=0.05) and LN status (P=0.002) but not grade (P=0.1). Together, these data indicate that biology and time both impact on size and LN status of invasive breast cancer, but grade reflects biology alone. In view of the clinical importance of breast cancer biology, grade as its most direct indicator assumes particular significance. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2362010 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2005 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-23620102009-09-10 Histopathologic indicators of breast cancer biology: insights from population mammographic screening Webster, L R Bilous, A M Willis, L Byth, K Burgemeister, F C Salisbury, E L C Clarke, C L Balleine, R L Br J Cancer Clinical Study Histopathologic features of breast cancer such as tumour size, grade and axillary lymph node (LN) status variably reflect tumour biology and time. Recent evidence suggests that the biological character of breast cancer is established at an early stage and has a major impact on clinical course. The aim of this study was to distinguish the impact of biology on breast cancer histopathology by comparing features of breast cancers diagnosed following population mammographic screening with prevalent vs incident detection and screening interval. Central histopathology review data from 1147 cases of ductal in situ and/or invasive breast cancer were examined. Size, grade and LN status of invasive cancers were positively correlated (P<0.001). Prevalent invasive cancers were larger (P<0.001) and more likely to be LN positive (P=0.02) than incident cases, but grade was not associated with screening episode (P=0.7). Screening interval for incident cancers was positively associated with invasive cancer size (P=0.05) and LN status (P=0.002) but not grade (P=0.1). Together, these data indicate that biology and time both impact on size and LN status of invasive breast cancer, but grade reflects biology alone. In view of the clinical importance of breast cancer biology, grade as its most direct indicator assumes particular significance. Nature Publishing Group 2005-04-25 2005-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2362010/ /pubmed/15812557 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602501 Text en Copyright © 2005 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Webster, L R Bilous, A M Willis, L Byth, K Burgemeister, F C Salisbury, E L C Clarke, C L Balleine, R L Histopathologic indicators of breast cancer biology: insights from population mammographic screening |
title | Histopathologic indicators of breast cancer biology: insights from population mammographic screening |
title_full | Histopathologic indicators of breast cancer biology: insights from population mammographic screening |
title_fullStr | Histopathologic indicators of breast cancer biology: insights from population mammographic screening |
title_full_unstemmed | Histopathologic indicators of breast cancer biology: insights from population mammographic screening |
title_short | Histopathologic indicators of breast cancer biology: insights from population mammographic screening |
title_sort | histopathologic indicators of breast cancer biology: insights from population mammographic screening |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2362010/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15812557 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602501 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT websterlr histopathologicindicatorsofbreastcancerbiologyinsightsfrompopulationmammographicscreening AT bilousam histopathologicindicatorsofbreastcancerbiologyinsightsfrompopulationmammographicscreening AT willisl histopathologicindicatorsofbreastcancerbiologyinsightsfrompopulationmammographicscreening AT bythk histopathologicindicatorsofbreastcancerbiologyinsightsfrompopulationmammographicscreening AT burgemeisterfc histopathologicindicatorsofbreastcancerbiologyinsightsfrompopulationmammographicscreening AT salisburyelc histopathologicindicatorsofbreastcancerbiologyinsightsfrompopulationmammographicscreening AT clarkecl histopathologicindicatorsofbreastcancerbiologyinsightsfrompopulationmammographicscreening AT balleinerl histopathologicindicatorsofbreastcancerbiologyinsightsfrompopulationmammographicscreening |