Cargando…

Photodynamic therapy with mTHPC and polyethylene glycol-derived mTHPC: a comparative study on human tumour xenografts

The photosensitizing properties of m-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin (mTHPC) and polyethylene glycol-derivatized mTHPC (pegylated mTHPC) were compared in nude mice bearing human malignant mesothelioma, squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma xenografts. Laser light (20 J/cm(2)) at 652 nm was delivered...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ris, H-B, Krueger, T, Giger, A, Lim, C K, Stewart, J C M, Althaus, U, Altermatt, H J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 1999
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2362256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10098737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6690170
_version_ 1782153412704468992
author Ris, H-B
Krueger, T
Giger, A
Lim, C K
Stewart, J C M
Althaus, U
Altermatt, H J
author_facet Ris, H-B
Krueger, T
Giger, A
Lim, C K
Stewart, J C M
Althaus, U
Altermatt, H J
author_sort Ris, H-B
collection PubMed
description The photosensitizing properties of m-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin (mTHPC) and polyethylene glycol-derivatized mTHPC (pegylated mTHPC) were compared in nude mice bearing human malignant mesothelioma, squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma xenografts. Laser light (20 J/cm(2)) at 652 nm was delivered to the tumour (surface irradiance) and to an equal-sized area of the hind leg of the animals after i.p. administration of 0.1 mg/kg body weight mTHPC and an equimolar dose of pegylated mTHPC, respectively. The extent of tumour necrosis and normal tissue injury was assessed by histology. Both mTHPC and pegylated mTHPC catalyse photosensitized necrosis in mesothelioma xenografts at drug-light intervals of 1–4 days. The onset of action of pegylated mTHPC seemed slower but significantly exceeds that of mTHPC by days 3 and 4 with the greatest difference being noted at day 4. Pegylated mTHPC also induced significantly larger photonecrosis than mTHPC in squamous cell xenografts but not in adenocarcinoma at day 4, where mTHPC showed greatest activity. The degree of necrosis induced by pegylated mTHPC was the same for all three xenografts. mTHPC led to necrosis of skin and underlying muscle at a drug-light interval of 1 day but minor histological changes only at drug-light intervals from 2–4 days. In contrast, pegylated mTHPC did not result in histologically detectable changes in normal tissues under the same treatment conditions at any drug-light interval assessed. In this study, pegylated mTHPC had advantages as a photosensitizer compared to mTHPC. Tissue concentrations of mTHPC and pegylated mTHPC were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography in non-irradiated animals 4 days after administration. There was no significant difference in tumour uptake between the two sensitizers in mesothelioma, adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma xenografts. Tissue concentration measurements were of limited use for predicting photosensitization in this model. © 1999 Cancer Research Campaign
format Text
id pubmed-2362256
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1999
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23622562009-09-10 Photodynamic therapy with mTHPC and polyethylene glycol-derived mTHPC: a comparative study on human tumour xenografts Ris, H-B Krueger, T Giger, A Lim, C K Stewart, J C M Althaus, U Altermatt, H J Br J Cancer Regular Article The photosensitizing properties of m-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin (mTHPC) and polyethylene glycol-derivatized mTHPC (pegylated mTHPC) were compared in nude mice bearing human malignant mesothelioma, squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma xenografts. Laser light (20 J/cm(2)) at 652 nm was delivered to the tumour (surface irradiance) and to an equal-sized area of the hind leg of the animals after i.p. administration of 0.1 mg/kg body weight mTHPC and an equimolar dose of pegylated mTHPC, respectively. The extent of tumour necrosis and normal tissue injury was assessed by histology. Both mTHPC and pegylated mTHPC catalyse photosensitized necrosis in mesothelioma xenografts at drug-light intervals of 1–4 days. The onset of action of pegylated mTHPC seemed slower but significantly exceeds that of mTHPC by days 3 and 4 with the greatest difference being noted at day 4. Pegylated mTHPC also induced significantly larger photonecrosis than mTHPC in squamous cell xenografts but not in adenocarcinoma at day 4, where mTHPC showed greatest activity. The degree of necrosis induced by pegylated mTHPC was the same for all three xenografts. mTHPC led to necrosis of skin and underlying muscle at a drug-light interval of 1 day but minor histological changes only at drug-light intervals from 2–4 days. In contrast, pegylated mTHPC did not result in histologically detectable changes in normal tissues under the same treatment conditions at any drug-light interval assessed. In this study, pegylated mTHPC had advantages as a photosensitizer compared to mTHPC. Tissue concentrations of mTHPC and pegylated mTHPC were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography in non-irradiated animals 4 days after administration. There was no significant difference in tumour uptake between the two sensitizers in mesothelioma, adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma xenografts. Tissue concentration measurements were of limited use for predicting photosensitization in this model. © 1999 Cancer Research Campaign Nature Publishing Group 1999-03 /pmc/articles/PMC2362256/ /pubmed/10098737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6690170 Text en Copyright © 1999 Cancer Research Campaign https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Regular Article
Ris, H-B
Krueger, T
Giger, A
Lim, C K
Stewart, J C M
Althaus, U
Altermatt, H J
Photodynamic therapy with mTHPC and polyethylene glycol-derived mTHPC: a comparative study on human tumour xenografts
title Photodynamic therapy with mTHPC and polyethylene glycol-derived mTHPC: a comparative study on human tumour xenografts
title_full Photodynamic therapy with mTHPC and polyethylene glycol-derived mTHPC: a comparative study on human tumour xenografts
title_fullStr Photodynamic therapy with mTHPC and polyethylene glycol-derived mTHPC: a comparative study on human tumour xenografts
title_full_unstemmed Photodynamic therapy with mTHPC and polyethylene glycol-derived mTHPC: a comparative study on human tumour xenografts
title_short Photodynamic therapy with mTHPC and polyethylene glycol-derived mTHPC: a comparative study on human tumour xenografts
title_sort photodynamic therapy with mthpc and polyethylene glycol-derived mthpc: a comparative study on human tumour xenografts
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2362256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10098737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6690170
work_keys_str_mv AT rishb photodynamictherapywithmthpcandpolyethyleneglycolderivedmthpcacomparativestudyonhumantumourxenografts
AT kruegert photodynamictherapywithmthpcandpolyethyleneglycolderivedmthpcacomparativestudyonhumantumourxenografts
AT gigera photodynamictherapywithmthpcandpolyethyleneglycolderivedmthpcacomparativestudyonhumantumourxenografts
AT limck photodynamictherapywithmthpcandpolyethyleneglycolderivedmthpcacomparativestudyonhumantumourxenografts
AT stewartjcm photodynamictherapywithmthpcandpolyethyleneglycolderivedmthpcacomparativestudyonhumantumourxenografts
AT althausu photodynamictherapywithmthpcandpolyethyleneglycolderivedmthpcacomparativestudyonhumantumourxenografts
AT altermatthj photodynamictherapywithmthpcandpolyethyleneglycolderivedmthpcacomparativestudyonhumantumourxenografts