Cargando…

Multi-institutional randomized clinical study on the comparative effects of intracavital chemotherapy alone versus immunotherapy alone versus immunochemotherapy for malignant effusion

The current prospective randomized study was designed to compare the effects of intracavitary (i.c.) chemotherapy vs immunotherapy vs immunochemotherapy for malignant effusion. Between 1992 and 1995, a total of 42 patients with malignant effusion were registered, and 41 patients were eligible for st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nio, Y, Nagami, H, Tamura, K, Tsubono, M, Nio, M, Sato, M, Kawabata, K, Hayashi, H, Shiraishi, T, Imai, S, Tsuchitani, T, Mizuta, J, Nakagawa, M, Fukumoto, M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 1999
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2362297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10360655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6690421
_version_ 1782153422879850496
author Nio, Y
Nagami, H
Tamura, K
Tsubono, M
Nio, M
Sato, M
Kawabata, K
Hayashi, H
Shiraishi, T
Imai, S
Tsuchitani, T
Mizuta, J
Nakagawa, M
Fukumoto, M
author_facet Nio, Y
Nagami, H
Tamura, K
Tsubono, M
Nio, M
Sato, M
Kawabata, K
Hayashi, H
Shiraishi, T
Imai, S
Tsuchitani, T
Mizuta, J
Nakagawa, M
Fukumoto, M
author_sort Nio, Y
collection PubMed
description The current prospective randomized study was designed to compare the effects of intracavitary (i.c.) chemotherapy vs immunotherapy vs immunochemotherapy for malignant effusion. Between 1992 and 1995, a total of 42 patients with malignant effusion were registered, and 41 patients were eligible for statistical analysis. The primary diseases of the eligible patients included 27 gastric, four colorectal, four pancreatic, three lung, two liver and one oesophageal cancers. The patients with malignant effusion were randomly assigned into one of three i.c. therapeutic regimens: chemotherapy alone with weekly injection of anticancer agents (ACAs: cisplatin, mitomycin-C, adriamycin, etc.) (Group A, n = 13); immunotherapy alone with weekly injection of streptococcal preparation OK-432 (Group B, n = 14); or immunochemotherapy with ACAs and OK-432 (Group C, n = 14). The response of the effusion, patient survival and the kinetics of cytokines in the effusion were compared. There were no differences in the patients' backgrounds. The side-effects of the regimens included pain, anorexia, fever, leucopenia and anaemia and there were no differences in their incidence among the three groups. One patient died after cisplatin (CDDP) administration in Group A. Cytologic examination revealed that tumour cells in the effusion disappeared in 23% of Group A cases, 36% of Group B cases and 36% of Group C cases. The malignant effusion did not disappear in any of the Group A cases; however, the effusion disappeared in 29% of Group B cases and 43% of Group C cases (P = 0.03, Group A vs Group C). Furthermore, the 50% survival period was 1.6 months for Group A, 2.4 months for Group B and 3.5 months for Group C. The 6-month survival rate was 7% for Group A, 6% for Group B and 34% for Group C, and the 1-year survival rate was 0%, 0% and 17% respectively (P = 0.048, Group A vs Group C by the log-rank test). The analysis of the cytokine kinetics revealed a prominent increase in the level of interleukin-6 in the effusion in Group C. These results suggest that i.c. immunochemotherapy with OK-432 and ACAs may be more beneficial than i.c. chemotherapy alone or immunotherapy alone. © 1999 Cancer Research Campaign
format Text
id pubmed-2362297
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1999
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23622972009-09-10 Multi-institutional randomized clinical study on the comparative effects of intracavital chemotherapy alone versus immunotherapy alone versus immunochemotherapy for malignant effusion Nio, Y Nagami, H Tamura, K Tsubono, M Nio, M Sato, M Kawabata, K Hayashi, H Shiraishi, T Imai, S Tsuchitani, T Mizuta, J Nakagawa, M Fukumoto, M Br J Cancer Regular Article The current prospective randomized study was designed to compare the effects of intracavitary (i.c.) chemotherapy vs immunotherapy vs immunochemotherapy for malignant effusion. Between 1992 and 1995, a total of 42 patients with malignant effusion were registered, and 41 patients were eligible for statistical analysis. The primary diseases of the eligible patients included 27 gastric, four colorectal, four pancreatic, three lung, two liver and one oesophageal cancers. The patients with malignant effusion were randomly assigned into one of three i.c. therapeutic regimens: chemotherapy alone with weekly injection of anticancer agents (ACAs: cisplatin, mitomycin-C, adriamycin, etc.) (Group A, n = 13); immunotherapy alone with weekly injection of streptococcal preparation OK-432 (Group B, n = 14); or immunochemotherapy with ACAs and OK-432 (Group C, n = 14). The response of the effusion, patient survival and the kinetics of cytokines in the effusion were compared. There were no differences in the patients' backgrounds. The side-effects of the regimens included pain, anorexia, fever, leucopenia and anaemia and there were no differences in their incidence among the three groups. One patient died after cisplatin (CDDP) administration in Group A. Cytologic examination revealed that tumour cells in the effusion disappeared in 23% of Group A cases, 36% of Group B cases and 36% of Group C cases. The malignant effusion did not disappear in any of the Group A cases; however, the effusion disappeared in 29% of Group B cases and 43% of Group C cases (P = 0.03, Group A vs Group C). Furthermore, the 50% survival period was 1.6 months for Group A, 2.4 months for Group B and 3.5 months for Group C. The 6-month survival rate was 7% for Group A, 6% for Group B and 34% for Group C, and the 1-year survival rate was 0%, 0% and 17% respectively (P = 0.048, Group A vs Group C by the log-rank test). The analysis of the cytokine kinetics revealed a prominent increase in the level of interleukin-6 in the effusion in Group C. These results suggest that i.c. immunochemotherapy with OK-432 and ACAs may be more beneficial than i.c. chemotherapy alone or immunotherapy alone. © 1999 Cancer Research Campaign Nature Publishing Group 1999-05 /pmc/articles/PMC2362297/ /pubmed/10360655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6690421 Text en Copyright © 1999 Cancer Research Campaign https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Regular Article
Nio, Y
Nagami, H
Tamura, K
Tsubono, M
Nio, M
Sato, M
Kawabata, K
Hayashi, H
Shiraishi, T
Imai, S
Tsuchitani, T
Mizuta, J
Nakagawa, M
Fukumoto, M
Multi-institutional randomized clinical study on the comparative effects of intracavital chemotherapy alone versus immunotherapy alone versus immunochemotherapy for malignant effusion
title Multi-institutional randomized clinical study on the comparative effects of intracavital chemotherapy alone versus immunotherapy alone versus immunochemotherapy for malignant effusion
title_full Multi-institutional randomized clinical study on the comparative effects of intracavital chemotherapy alone versus immunotherapy alone versus immunochemotherapy for malignant effusion
title_fullStr Multi-institutional randomized clinical study on the comparative effects of intracavital chemotherapy alone versus immunotherapy alone versus immunochemotherapy for malignant effusion
title_full_unstemmed Multi-institutional randomized clinical study on the comparative effects of intracavital chemotherapy alone versus immunotherapy alone versus immunochemotherapy for malignant effusion
title_short Multi-institutional randomized clinical study on the comparative effects of intracavital chemotherapy alone versus immunotherapy alone versus immunochemotherapy for malignant effusion
title_sort multi-institutional randomized clinical study on the comparative effects of intracavital chemotherapy alone versus immunotherapy alone versus immunochemotherapy for malignant effusion
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2362297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10360655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6690421
work_keys_str_mv AT nioy multiinstitutionalrandomizedclinicalstudyonthecomparativeeffectsofintracavitalchemotherapyaloneversusimmunotherapyaloneversusimmunochemotherapyformalignanteffusion
AT nagamih multiinstitutionalrandomizedclinicalstudyonthecomparativeeffectsofintracavitalchemotherapyaloneversusimmunotherapyaloneversusimmunochemotherapyformalignanteffusion
AT tamurak multiinstitutionalrandomizedclinicalstudyonthecomparativeeffectsofintracavitalchemotherapyaloneversusimmunotherapyaloneversusimmunochemotherapyformalignanteffusion
AT tsubonom multiinstitutionalrandomizedclinicalstudyonthecomparativeeffectsofintracavitalchemotherapyaloneversusimmunotherapyaloneversusimmunochemotherapyformalignanteffusion
AT niom multiinstitutionalrandomizedclinicalstudyonthecomparativeeffectsofintracavitalchemotherapyaloneversusimmunotherapyaloneversusimmunochemotherapyformalignanteffusion
AT satom multiinstitutionalrandomizedclinicalstudyonthecomparativeeffectsofintracavitalchemotherapyaloneversusimmunotherapyaloneversusimmunochemotherapyformalignanteffusion
AT kawabatak multiinstitutionalrandomizedclinicalstudyonthecomparativeeffectsofintracavitalchemotherapyaloneversusimmunotherapyaloneversusimmunochemotherapyformalignanteffusion
AT hayashih multiinstitutionalrandomizedclinicalstudyonthecomparativeeffectsofintracavitalchemotherapyaloneversusimmunotherapyaloneversusimmunochemotherapyformalignanteffusion
AT shiraishit multiinstitutionalrandomizedclinicalstudyonthecomparativeeffectsofintracavitalchemotherapyaloneversusimmunotherapyaloneversusimmunochemotherapyformalignanteffusion
AT imais multiinstitutionalrandomizedclinicalstudyonthecomparativeeffectsofintracavitalchemotherapyaloneversusimmunotherapyaloneversusimmunochemotherapyformalignanteffusion
AT tsuchitanit multiinstitutionalrandomizedclinicalstudyonthecomparativeeffectsofintracavitalchemotherapyaloneversusimmunotherapyaloneversusimmunochemotherapyformalignanteffusion
AT mizutaj multiinstitutionalrandomizedclinicalstudyonthecomparativeeffectsofintracavitalchemotherapyaloneversusimmunotherapyaloneversusimmunochemotherapyformalignanteffusion
AT nakagawam multiinstitutionalrandomizedclinicalstudyonthecomparativeeffectsofintracavitalchemotherapyaloneversusimmunotherapyaloneversusimmunochemotherapyformalignanteffusion
AT fukumotom multiinstitutionalrandomizedclinicalstudyonthecomparativeeffectsofintracavitalchemotherapyaloneversusimmunotherapyaloneversusimmunochemotherapyformalignanteffusion