Cargando…
The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women's risk perceptions and levels of distress
Women referred to a familial breast cancer clinic completed questionnaires before and after counselling and at annual follow-up to assess their risk estimate and psychological characteristics. The aims were to determine whether those who attended the clinic overestimated their risk or were highly an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
1999
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2362435/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10027320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6690078 |
_version_ | 1782153452850249728 |
---|---|
author | Cull, A Anderson, E D C Campbell, S Mackay, J Smyth, E Steel, M |
author_facet | Cull, A Anderson, E D C Campbell, S Mackay, J Smyth, E Steel, M |
author_sort | Cull, A |
collection | PubMed |
description | Women referred to a familial breast cancer clinic completed questionnaires before and after counselling and at annual follow-up to assess their risk estimate and psychological characteristics. The aims were to determine whether those who attended the clinic overestimated their risk or were highly anxious and whether counselling influenced risk estimates and levels of distress. Women (n = 450) at this clinic were more likely to underestimate (39%) than overestimate (14%) their risk. Mean trait anxiety scores were higher than general population data (t = 4.9, n = 1059, P < 0.001) but not significantly different from published data from other screening samples. Overestimators (z = 5.69, P < 0.0001) and underestimators (z = –8.01, P < 0.0001) reported significantly different risk estimates (i.e. increased accuracy) after counselling, but significant inaccuracies persisted. Over- (n = 12) and underestimators (n = 60) were still inaccurate in their risk estimates by a factor of 2 after counselling. Thirty per cent of the sample scored above the cut-off (5/6) for case identification on a screening measure for psychological distress, the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ). GHQ scores were significantly lower after counselling (t = 3.6, d.f. = 384, P = 0.0004) with no evidence of increasing risk estimate causing increased distress. The risk of distress after counselling was greater for younger women and those who were more distressed at first presentation. The counselling offered was effective in increasing the accuracy of risk perceptions without causing distress to those who initially underestimated their risk. It is worrying that inaccuracies persisted, particularly as the demand for service has since reduced the consultation time offered in this clinic. Further work is needed to evaluate alternative models of service delivery using more sophisticated methods of assessing understanding of risk. © 1999 Cancer Research Campaign |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2362435 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1999 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-23624352009-09-10 The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women's risk perceptions and levels of distress Cull, A Anderson, E D C Campbell, S Mackay, J Smyth, E Steel, M Br J Cancer Regular Article Women referred to a familial breast cancer clinic completed questionnaires before and after counselling and at annual follow-up to assess their risk estimate and psychological characteristics. The aims were to determine whether those who attended the clinic overestimated their risk or were highly anxious and whether counselling influenced risk estimates and levels of distress. Women (n = 450) at this clinic were more likely to underestimate (39%) than overestimate (14%) their risk. Mean trait anxiety scores were higher than general population data (t = 4.9, n = 1059, P < 0.001) but not significantly different from published data from other screening samples. Overestimators (z = 5.69, P < 0.0001) and underestimators (z = –8.01, P < 0.0001) reported significantly different risk estimates (i.e. increased accuracy) after counselling, but significant inaccuracies persisted. Over- (n = 12) and underestimators (n = 60) were still inaccurate in their risk estimates by a factor of 2 after counselling. Thirty per cent of the sample scored above the cut-off (5/6) for case identification on a screening measure for psychological distress, the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ). GHQ scores were significantly lower after counselling (t = 3.6, d.f. = 384, P = 0.0004) with no evidence of increasing risk estimate causing increased distress. The risk of distress after counselling was greater for younger women and those who were more distressed at first presentation. The counselling offered was effective in increasing the accuracy of risk perceptions without causing distress to those who initially underestimated their risk. It is worrying that inaccuracies persisted, particularly as the demand for service has since reduced the consultation time offered in this clinic. Further work is needed to evaluate alternative models of service delivery using more sophisticated methods of assessing understanding of risk. © 1999 Cancer Research Campaign Nature Publishing Group 1999-02 /pmc/articles/PMC2362435/ /pubmed/10027320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6690078 Text en Copyright © 1999 Cancer Research Campaign https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Regular Article Cull, A Anderson, E D C Campbell, S Mackay, J Smyth, E Steel, M The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women's risk perceptions and levels of distress |
title | The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women's risk perceptions and levels of distress |
title_full | The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women's risk perceptions and levels of distress |
title_fullStr | The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women's risk perceptions and levels of distress |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women's risk perceptions and levels of distress |
title_short | The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women's risk perceptions and levels of distress |
title_sort | impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women's risk perceptions and levels of distress |
topic | Regular Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2362435/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10027320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6690078 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT culla theimpactofgeneticcounsellingaboutbreastcancerriskonwomensriskperceptionsandlevelsofdistress AT andersonedc theimpactofgeneticcounsellingaboutbreastcancerriskonwomensriskperceptionsandlevelsofdistress AT campbells theimpactofgeneticcounsellingaboutbreastcancerriskonwomensriskperceptionsandlevelsofdistress AT mackayj theimpactofgeneticcounsellingaboutbreastcancerriskonwomensriskperceptionsandlevelsofdistress AT smythe theimpactofgeneticcounsellingaboutbreastcancerriskonwomensriskperceptionsandlevelsofdistress AT steelm theimpactofgeneticcounsellingaboutbreastcancerriskonwomensriskperceptionsandlevelsofdistress AT culla impactofgeneticcounsellingaboutbreastcancerriskonwomensriskperceptionsandlevelsofdistress AT andersonedc impactofgeneticcounsellingaboutbreastcancerriskonwomensriskperceptionsandlevelsofdistress AT campbells impactofgeneticcounsellingaboutbreastcancerriskonwomensriskperceptionsandlevelsofdistress AT mackayj impactofgeneticcounsellingaboutbreastcancerriskonwomensriskperceptionsandlevelsofdistress AT smythe impactofgeneticcounsellingaboutbreastcancerriskonwomensriskperceptionsandlevelsofdistress AT steelm impactofgeneticcounsellingaboutbreastcancerriskonwomensriskperceptionsandlevelsofdistress |