Cargando…

The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women's risk perceptions and levels of distress

Women referred to a familial breast cancer clinic completed questionnaires before and after counselling and at annual follow-up to assess their risk estimate and psychological characteristics. The aims were to determine whether those who attended the clinic overestimated their risk or were highly an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cull, A, Anderson, E D C, Campbell, S, Mackay, J, Smyth, E, Steel, M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 1999
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2362435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10027320
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6690078
_version_ 1782153452850249728
author Cull, A
Anderson, E D C
Campbell, S
Mackay, J
Smyth, E
Steel, M
author_facet Cull, A
Anderson, E D C
Campbell, S
Mackay, J
Smyth, E
Steel, M
author_sort Cull, A
collection PubMed
description Women referred to a familial breast cancer clinic completed questionnaires before and after counselling and at annual follow-up to assess their risk estimate and psychological characteristics. The aims were to determine whether those who attended the clinic overestimated their risk or were highly anxious and whether counselling influenced risk estimates and levels of distress. Women (n = 450) at this clinic were more likely to underestimate (39%) than overestimate (14%) their risk. Mean trait anxiety scores were higher than general population data (t = 4.9, n = 1059, P < 0.001) but not significantly different from published data from other screening samples. Overestimators (z = 5.69, P < 0.0001) and underestimators (z = –8.01, P < 0.0001) reported significantly different risk estimates (i.e. increased accuracy) after counselling, but significant inaccuracies persisted. Over- (n = 12) and underestimators (n = 60) were still inaccurate in their risk estimates by a factor of 2 after counselling. Thirty per cent of the sample scored above the cut-off (5/6) for case identification on a screening measure for psychological distress, the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ). GHQ scores were significantly lower after counselling (t = 3.6, d.f. = 384, P = 0.0004) with no evidence of increasing risk estimate causing increased distress. The risk of distress after counselling was greater for younger women and those who were more distressed at first presentation. The counselling offered was effective in increasing the accuracy of risk perceptions without causing distress to those who initially underestimated their risk. It is worrying that inaccuracies persisted, particularly as the demand for service has since reduced the consultation time offered in this clinic. Further work is needed to evaluate alternative models of service delivery using more sophisticated methods of assessing understanding of risk. © 1999 Cancer Research Campaign
format Text
id pubmed-2362435
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1999
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23624352009-09-10 The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women's risk perceptions and levels of distress Cull, A Anderson, E D C Campbell, S Mackay, J Smyth, E Steel, M Br J Cancer Regular Article Women referred to a familial breast cancer clinic completed questionnaires before and after counselling and at annual follow-up to assess their risk estimate and psychological characteristics. The aims were to determine whether those who attended the clinic overestimated their risk or were highly anxious and whether counselling influenced risk estimates and levels of distress. Women (n = 450) at this clinic were more likely to underestimate (39%) than overestimate (14%) their risk. Mean trait anxiety scores were higher than general population data (t = 4.9, n = 1059, P < 0.001) but not significantly different from published data from other screening samples. Overestimators (z = 5.69, P < 0.0001) and underestimators (z = –8.01, P < 0.0001) reported significantly different risk estimates (i.e. increased accuracy) after counselling, but significant inaccuracies persisted. Over- (n = 12) and underestimators (n = 60) were still inaccurate in their risk estimates by a factor of 2 after counselling. Thirty per cent of the sample scored above the cut-off (5/6) for case identification on a screening measure for psychological distress, the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ). GHQ scores were significantly lower after counselling (t = 3.6, d.f. = 384, P = 0.0004) with no evidence of increasing risk estimate causing increased distress. The risk of distress after counselling was greater for younger women and those who were more distressed at first presentation. The counselling offered was effective in increasing the accuracy of risk perceptions without causing distress to those who initially underestimated their risk. It is worrying that inaccuracies persisted, particularly as the demand for service has since reduced the consultation time offered in this clinic. Further work is needed to evaluate alternative models of service delivery using more sophisticated methods of assessing understanding of risk. © 1999 Cancer Research Campaign Nature Publishing Group 1999-02 /pmc/articles/PMC2362435/ /pubmed/10027320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6690078 Text en Copyright © 1999 Cancer Research Campaign https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Regular Article
Cull, A
Anderson, E D C
Campbell, S
Mackay, J
Smyth, E
Steel, M
The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women's risk perceptions and levels of distress
title The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women's risk perceptions and levels of distress
title_full The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women's risk perceptions and levels of distress
title_fullStr The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women's risk perceptions and levels of distress
title_full_unstemmed The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women's risk perceptions and levels of distress
title_short The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women's risk perceptions and levels of distress
title_sort impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women's risk perceptions and levels of distress
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2362435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10027320
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6690078
work_keys_str_mv AT culla theimpactofgeneticcounsellingaboutbreastcancerriskonwomensriskperceptionsandlevelsofdistress
AT andersonedc theimpactofgeneticcounsellingaboutbreastcancerriskonwomensriskperceptionsandlevelsofdistress
AT campbells theimpactofgeneticcounsellingaboutbreastcancerriskonwomensriskperceptionsandlevelsofdistress
AT mackayj theimpactofgeneticcounsellingaboutbreastcancerriskonwomensriskperceptionsandlevelsofdistress
AT smythe theimpactofgeneticcounsellingaboutbreastcancerriskonwomensriskperceptionsandlevelsofdistress
AT steelm theimpactofgeneticcounsellingaboutbreastcancerriskonwomensriskperceptionsandlevelsofdistress
AT culla impactofgeneticcounsellingaboutbreastcancerriskonwomensriskperceptionsandlevelsofdistress
AT andersonedc impactofgeneticcounsellingaboutbreastcancerriskonwomensriskperceptionsandlevelsofdistress
AT campbells impactofgeneticcounsellingaboutbreastcancerriskonwomensriskperceptionsandlevelsofdistress
AT mackayj impactofgeneticcounsellingaboutbreastcancerriskonwomensriskperceptionsandlevelsofdistress
AT smythe impactofgeneticcounsellingaboutbreastcancerriskonwomensriskperceptionsandlevelsofdistress
AT steelm impactofgeneticcounsellingaboutbreastcancerriskonwomensriskperceptionsandlevelsofdistress