Cargando…
Second-line treatment for primary central nervous system lymphoma
Failure after first-line treatment was reported in 35–60% of immunocompetent patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). There are currently no reports focusing on salvage therapy. This review analyses prognostic factors and the efficacy of salvage therapy by focusing on data from...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
1999
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2362452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10027325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6690083 |
_version_ | 1782153457402118144 |
---|---|
author | Reni, M Ferreri, A J M Villa, E |
author_facet | Reni, M Ferreri, A J M Villa, E |
author_sort | Reni, M |
collection | PubMed |
description | Failure after first-line treatment was reported in 35–60% of immunocompetent patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). There are currently no reports focusing on salvage therapy. This review analyses prognostic factors and the efficacy of salvage therapy by focusing on data from papers reporting results of first-line treatment in 355 cases. The study group consisted of 173 patients presenting treatment failure. The interval between failure and death (TTD) was compared for age at relapse (≤60 vs >60 years), type of failure (relapse vs progression), time to relapse (≤12 vs >12 months) and salvage treatment (yes vs no). Median TTD was similar in younger and older patients (P = 0.09). Relapsed patients had a longer TTD than patients with progressive disease (P = 0.002). Early relapse led to a shorter TTD than late relapse (P = 0.005). Median TTD was 14 months for patients who underwent salvage therapy and 2 months for untreated cases (P < 0.00001). A multivariate analysis showed an independent prognostic role for salvage therapy and time to relapse. Age and type of failure had no predictive value. Salvage therapy significantly improves outcome and, possibly, quality of life. As many different treatments were used conclusions cannot be made regarding an optimal treatment schedule. © 1999 Cancer Research Campaign |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2362452 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1999 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-23624522009-09-10 Second-line treatment for primary central nervous system lymphoma Reni, M Ferreri, A J M Villa, E Br J Cancer Regular Article Failure after first-line treatment was reported in 35–60% of immunocompetent patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). There are currently no reports focusing on salvage therapy. This review analyses prognostic factors and the efficacy of salvage therapy by focusing on data from papers reporting results of first-line treatment in 355 cases. The study group consisted of 173 patients presenting treatment failure. The interval between failure and death (TTD) was compared for age at relapse (≤60 vs >60 years), type of failure (relapse vs progression), time to relapse (≤12 vs >12 months) and salvage treatment (yes vs no). Median TTD was similar in younger and older patients (P = 0.09). Relapsed patients had a longer TTD than patients with progressive disease (P = 0.002). Early relapse led to a shorter TTD than late relapse (P = 0.005). Median TTD was 14 months for patients who underwent salvage therapy and 2 months for untreated cases (P < 0.00001). A multivariate analysis showed an independent prognostic role for salvage therapy and time to relapse. Age and type of failure had no predictive value. Salvage therapy significantly improves outcome and, possibly, quality of life. As many different treatments were used conclusions cannot be made regarding an optimal treatment schedule. © 1999 Cancer Research Campaign Nature Publishing Group 1999-02 /pmc/articles/PMC2362452/ /pubmed/10027325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6690083 Text en Copyright © 1999 Cancer Research Campaign https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Regular Article Reni, M Ferreri, A J M Villa, E Second-line treatment for primary central nervous system lymphoma |
title | Second-line treatment for primary central nervous system lymphoma |
title_full | Second-line treatment for primary central nervous system lymphoma |
title_fullStr | Second-line treatment for primary central nervous system lymphoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Second-line treatment for primary central nervous system lymphoma |
title_short | Second-line treatment for primary central nervous system lymphoma |
title_sort | second-line treatment for primary central nervous system lymphoma |
topic | Regular Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2362452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10027325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6690083 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT renim secondlinetreatmentforprimarycentralnervoussystemlymphoma AT ferreriajm secondlinetreatmentforprimarycentralnervoussystemlymphoma AT villae secondlinetreatmentforprimarycentralnervoussystemlymphoma |