Cargando…

Intraurethral Catheter: Alternative Management for Urinary Retention in Patients With Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy

A polyurethane intraurethral catheter (IUC) was used in 27 patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy who were unfit for surgery, or were awaiting surgery. All of them had previously had a periurethral catheter inserted. The IUC was inserted with a cystoscope under fluoroscopic control. Spontaneous...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Punekar, Sulabha, Ramkrishnan, Prem A., Kelkar, Anand R., Date, Jaydeep A., Ridhorkar, Vasudeo R.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 1995
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2362524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18493391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/DTE.2.113
_version_ 1782153473599471616
author Punekar, Sulabha
Ramkrishnan, Prem A.
Kelkar, Anand R.
Date, Jaydeep A.
Ridhorkar, Vasudeo R.
author_facet Punekar, Sulabha
Ramkrishnan, Prem A.
Kelkar, Anand R.
Date, Jaydeep A.
Ridhorkar, Vasudeo R.
author_sort Punekar, Sulabha
collection PubMed
description A polyurethane intraurethral catheter (IUC) was used in 27 patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy who were unfit for surgery, or were awaiting surgery. All of them had previously had a periurethral catheter inserted. The IUC was inserted with a cystoscope under fluoroscopic control. Spontaneous voiding through the IUC resumed in 25 patients (93%) in the immediate postprocedure period. At the end of 6 months follow-up, the peak flow rates and the residual volumes estimated in 22 patients were satisfactory. Immediate complications included incontinence due to distal displacement in 2 patients and hematuria in one patient; long-term complications included mild encrustation of the IUC in 2 patients and calculus formation on the IUC in 1 patient. None of the patients had clinically significant urinary tract infection. The presence of the IUC did not compromise the subsequent transurethral resection of the prostate gland. We recommend the use of an IUC for up to 6 months in patients with urinary retention who are awaiting surgery or are unfit for surgery as an alternative to an indwelling urethral catheter.
format Text
id pubmed-2362524
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1995
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23625242008-05-20 Intraurethral Catheter: Alternative Management for Urinary Retention in Patients With Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy Punekar, Sulabha Ramkrishnan, Prem A. Kelkar, Anand R. Date, Jaydeep A. Ridhorkar, Vasudeo R. Diagn Ther Endosc Research Article A polyurethane intraurethral catheter (IUC) was used in 27 patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy who were unfit for surgery, or were awaiting surgery. All of them had previously had a periurethral catheter inserted. The IUC was inserted with a cystoscope under fluoroscopic control. Spontaneous voiding through the IUC resumed in 25 patients (93%) in the immediate postprocedure period. At the end of 6 months follow-up, the peak flow rates and the residual volumes estimated in 22 patients were satisfactory. Immediate complications included incontinence due to distal displacement in 2 patients and hematuria in one patient; long-term complications included mild encrustation of the IUC in 2 patients and calculus formation on the IUC in 1 patient. None of the patients had clinically significant urinary tract infection. The presence of the IUC did not compromise the subsequent transurethral resection of the prostate gland. We recommend the use of an IUC for up to 6 months in patients with urinary retention who are awaiting surgery or are unfit for surgery as an alternative to an indwelling urethral catheter. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 1995 /pmc/articles/PMC2362524/ /pubmed/18493391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/DTE.2.113 Text en Copyright © 1995 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Punekar, Sulabha
Ramkrishnan, Prem A.
Kelkar, Anand R.
Date, Jaydeep A.
Ridhorkar, Vasudeo R.
Intraurethral Catheter: Alternative Management for Urinary Retention in Patients With Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy
title Intraurethral Catheter: Alternative Management for Urinary Retention in Patients With Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy
title_full Intraurethral Catheter: Alternative Management for Urinary Retention in Patients With Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy
title_fullStr Intraurethral Catheter: Alternative Management for Urinary Retention in Patients With Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy
title_full_unstemmed Intraurethral Catheter: Alternative Management for Urinary Retention in Patients With Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy
title_short Intraurethral Catheter: Alternative Management for Urinary Retention in Patients With Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy
title_sort intraurethral catheter: alternative management for urinary retention in patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2362524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18493391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/DTE.2.113
work_keys_str_mv AT punekarsulabha intraurethralcatheteralternativemanagementforurinaryretentioninpatientswithbenignprostatichypertrophy
AT ramkrishnanprema intraurethralcatheteralternativemanagementforurinaryretentioninpatientswithbenignprostatichypertrophy
AT kelkaranandr intraurethralcatheteralternativemanagementforurinaryretentioninpatientswithbenignprostatichypertrophy
AT datejaydeepa intraurethralcatheteralternativemanagementforurinaryretentioninpatientswithbenignprostatichypertrophy
AT ridhorkarvasudeor intraurethralcatheteralternativemanagementforurinaryretentioninpatientswithbenignprostatichypertrophy