Cargando…
Intraurethral Catheter: Alternative Management for Urinary Retention in Patients With Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy
A polyurethane intraurethral catheter (IUC) was used in 27 patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy who were unfit for surgery, or were awaiting surgery. All of them had previously had a periurethral catheter inserted. The IUC was inserted with a cystoscope under fluoroscopic control. Spontaneous...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
1995
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2362524/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18493391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/DTE.2.113 |
_version_ | 1782153473599471616 |
---|---|
author | Punekar, Sulabha Ramkrishnan, Prem A. Kelkar, Anand R. Date, Jaydeep A. Ridhorkar, Vasudeo R. |
author_facet | Punekar, Sulabha Ramkrishnan, Prem A. Kelkar, Anand R. Date, Jaydeep A. Ridhorkar, Vasudeo R. |
author_sort | Punekar, Sulabha |
collection | PubMed |
description | A polyurethane intraurethral catheter (IUC) was used in 27 patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy who were unfit for surgery, or were awaiting surgery. All of them had previously had a periurethral catheter inserted. The IUC was inserted with a cystoscope under fluoroscopic control. Spontaneous voiding through the IUC resumed in 25 patients (93%) in the immediate postprocedure period. At the end of 6 months follow-up, the peak flow rates and the residual volumes estimated in 22 patients were satisfactory. Immediate complications included incontinence due to distal displacement in 2 patients and hematuria in one patient; long-term complications included mild encrustation of the IUC in 2 patients and calculus formation on the IUC in 1 patient. None of the patients had clinically significant urinary tract infection. The presence of the IUC did not compromise the subsequent transurethral resection of the prostate gland. We recommend the use of an IUC for up to 6 months in patients with urinary retention who are awaiting surgery or are unfit for surgery as an alternative to an indwelling urethral catheter. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2362524 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1995 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-23625242008-05-20 Intraurethral Catheter: Alternative Management for Urinary Retention in Patients With Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy Punekar, Sulabha Ramkrishnan, Prem A. Kelkar, Anand R. Date, Jaydeep A. Ridhorkar, Vasudeo R. Diagn Ther Endosc Research Article A polyurethane intraurethral catheter (IUC) was used in 27 patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy who were unfit for surgery, or were awaiting surgery. All of them had previously had a periurethral catheter inserted. The IUC was inserted with a cystoscope under fluoroscopic control. Spontaneous voiding through the IUC resumed in 25 patients (93%) in the immediate postprocedure period. At the end of 6 months follow-up, the peak flow rates and the residual volumes estimated in 22 patients were satisfactory. Immediate complications included incontinence due to distal displacement in 2 patients and hematuria in one patient; long-term complications included mild encrustation of the IUC in 2 patients and calculus formation on the IUC in 1 patient. None of the patients had clinically significant urinary tract infection. The presence of the IUC did not compromise the subsequent transurethral resection of the prostate gland. We recommend the use of an IUC for up to 6 months in patients with urinary retention who are awaiting surgery or are unfit for surgery as an alternative to an indwelling urethral catheter. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 1995 /pmc/articles/PMC2362524/ /pubmed/18493391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/DTE.2.113 Text en Copyright © 1995 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Punekar, Sulabha Ramkrishnan, Prem A. Kelkar, Anand R. Date, Jaydeep A. Ridhorkar, Vasudeo R. Intraurethral Catheter: Alternative Management for Urinary Retention in Patients With Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy |
title | Intraurethral Catheter: Alternative Management for Urinary Retention in Patients With Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy |
title_full | Intraurethral Catheter: Alternative Management for Urinary Retention in Patients With Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy |
title_fullStr | Intraurethral Catheter: Alternative Management for Urinary Retention in Patients With Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy |
title_full_unstemmed | Intraurethral Catheter: Alternative Management for Urinary Retention in Patients With Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy |
title_short | Intraurethral Catheter: Alternative Management for Urinary Retention in Patients With Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy |
title_sort | intraurethral catheter: alternative management for urinary retention in patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2362524/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18493391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/DTE.2.113 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT punekarsulabha intraurethralcatheteralternativemanagementforurinaryretentioninpatientswithbenignprostatichypertrophy AT ramkrishnanprema intraurethralcatheteralternativemanagementforurinaryretentioninpatientswithbenignprostatichypertrophy AT kelkaranandr intraurethralcatheteralternativemanagementforurinaryretentioninpatientswithbenignprostatichypertrophy AT datejaydeepa intraurethralcatheteralternativemanagementforurinaryretentioninpatientswithbenignprostatichypertrophy AT ridhorkarvasudeor intraurethralcatheteralternativemanagementforurinaryretentioninpatientswithbenignprostatichypertrophy |