Cargando…

A unified definition of clinical anthracycline resistance breast cancer

The purpose of the study was to determine the response rates (RR) and duration to second- and third-line chemotherapy programmes in patients with anthracycline-resistant breast cancer, utilizing various definitions of anthracycline resistance. This was a retrospective analysis performed on 1335 pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pivot, X, Asmar, L, Buzdar, A U, Valero, V, Hortobagyi, G
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2000
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2363337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10682660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.1999.0958
_version_ 1782153678769094656
author Pivot, X
Asmar, L
Buzdar, A U
Valero, V
Hortobagyi, G
author_facet Pivot, X
Asmar, L
Buzdar, A U
Valero, V
Hortobagyi, G
author_sort Pivot, X
collection PubMed
description The purpose of the study was to determine the response rates (RR) and duration to second- and third-line chemotherapy programmes in patients with anthracycline-resistant breast cancer, utilizing various definitions of anthracycline resistance. This was a retrospective analysis performed on 1335 patients with metastatic breast cancer who participated in consecutive clinical trials of first line, anthracycline-containing combination chemotherapy (ACCC) at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center between July 1973 and April 1980. Anthracycline-resistant groups were identified using definitions of anthracycline resistance found in the literature: progressive disease as best response to ACCC (Group 1, n = 56 patients); progressive disease while receiving ACCC after an intervening response to the drug (Group 2, n = 84); progressive disease within 6 months of last dose of ACCC (Group 3, n = 233); and progressive disease within 12 months of last dose of ACCC (Group 4, n = 272). Second- and third-line therapies administered to these patients included methotrexate, doxorubicin, mitoxantrone, bisantrene, vinblastine, vindesine, melphalan, mitomycin, cisplatin, etoposide and others, but not taxanes. The distribution of patients' characteristics was similar between the four groups, as was the use of second- and third-line regimens. Response rate (RR) to second-line chemotherapy were 5% and 7.7% for Group 1 and Group 2 respectively. In contrast, RR to second-line chemotherapy were 21.6% and 15% for Group 3 and 4. The differences in response rate between the combination of Groups 1 and 2 and Groups 3 or 4 were significant (P = 0.005 and P = 0.04 respectively). These results indicate that strictly defined anthracycline resistance as defined in Groups 1 and 2 is associated with resistance to many other cytotoxic drugs. The definitions used in Groups 3 and 4 include many patients with responsive tumours, and a more favourable prognosis. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign
format Text
id pubmed-2363337
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2000
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23633372009-09-10 A unified definition of clinical anthracycline resistance breast cancer Pivot, X Asmar, L Buzdar, A U Valero, V Hortobagyi, G Br J Cancer Regular Article The purpose of the study was to determine the response rates (RR) and duration to second- and third-line chemotherapy programmes in patients with anthracycline-resistant breast cancer, utilizing various definitions of anthracycline resistance. This was a retrospective analysis performed on 1335 patients with metastatic breast cancer who participated in consecutive clinical trials of first line, anthracycline-containing combination chemotherapy (ACCC) at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center between July 1973 and April 1980. Anthracycline-resistant groups were identified using definitions of anthracycline resistance found in the literature: progressive disease as best response to ACCC (Group 1, n = 56 patients); progressive disease while receiving ACCC after an intervening response to the drug (Group 2, n = 84); progressive disease within 6 months of last dose of ACCC (Group 3, n = 233); and progressive disease within 12 months of last dose of ACCC (Group 4, n = 272). Second- and third-line therapies administered to these patients included methotrexate, doxorubicin, mitoxantrone, bisantrene, vinblastine, vindesine, melphalan, mitomycin, cisplatin, etoposide and others, but not taxanes. The distribution of patients' characteristics was similar between the four groups, as was the use of second- and third-line regimens. Response rate (RR) to second-line chemotherapy were 5% and 7.7% for Group 1 and Group 2 respectively. In contrast, RR to second-line chemotherapy were 21.6% and 15% for Group 3 and 4. The differences in response rate between the combination of Groups 1 and 2 and Groups 3 or 4 were significant (P = 0.005 and P = 0.04 respectively). These results indicate that strictly defined anthracycline resistance as defined in Groups 1 and 2 is associated with resistance to many other cytotoxic drugs. The definitions used in Groups 3 and 4 include many patients with responsive tumours, and a more favourable prognosis. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign Nature Publishing Group 2000-02 2000-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC2363337/ /pubmed/10682660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.1999.0958 Text en Copyright © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Regular Article
Pivot, X
Asmar, L
Buzdar, A U
Valero, V
Hortobagyi, G
A unified definition of clinical anthracycline resistance breast cancer
title A unified definition of clinical anthracycline resistance breast cancer
title_full A unified definition of clinical anthracycline resistance breast cancer
title_fullStr A unified definition of clinical anthracycline resistance breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed A unified definition of clinical anthracycline resistance breast cancer
title_short A unified definition of clinical anthracycline resistance breast cancer
title_sort unified definition of clinical anthracycline resistance breast cancer
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2363337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10682660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.1999.0958
work_keys_str_mv AT pivotx aunifieddefinitionofclinicalanthracyclineresistancebreastcancer
AT asmarl aunifieddefinitionofclinicalanthracyclineresistancebreastcancer
AT buzdarau aunifieddefinitionofclinicalanthracyclineresistancebreastcancer
AT valerov aunifieddefinitionofclinicalanthracyclineresistancebreastcancer
AT hortobagyig aunifieddefinitionofclinicalanthracyclineresistancebreastcancer
AT pivotx unifieddefinitionofclinicalanthracyclineresistancebreastcancer
AT asmarl unifieddefinitionofclinicalanthracyclineresistancebreastcancer
AT buzdarau unifieddefinitionofclinicalanthracyclineresistancebreastcancer
AT valerov unifieddefinitionofclinicalanthracyclineresistancebreastcancer
AT hortobagyig unifieddefinitionofclinicalanthracyclineresistancebreastcancer