Cargando…
A unified definition of clinical anthracycline resistance breast cancer
The purpose of the study was to determine the response rates (RR) and duration to second- and third-line chemotherapy programmes in patients with anthracycline-resistant breast cancer, utilizing various definitions of anthracycline resistance. This was a retrospective analysis performed on 1335 pati...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2000
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2363337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10682660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.1999.0958 |
_version_ | 1782153678769094656 |
---|---|
author | Pivot, X Asmar, L Buzdar, A U Valero, V Hortobagyi, G |
author_facet | Pivot, X Asmar, L Buzdar, A U Valero, V Hortobagyi, G |
author_sort | Pivot, X |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of the study was to determine the response rates (RR) and duration to second- and third-line chemotherapy programmes in patients with anthracycline-resistant breast cancer, utilizing various definitions of anthracycline resistance. This was a retrospective analysis performed on 1335 patients with metastatic breast cancer who participated in consecutive clinical trials of first line, anthracycline-containing combination chemotherapy (ACCC) at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center between July 1973 and April 1980. Anthracycline-resistant groups were identified using definitions of anthracycline resistance found in the literature: progressive disease as best response to ACCC (Group 1, n = 56 patients); progressive disease while receiving ACCC after an intervening response to the drug (Group 2, n = 84); progressive disease within 6 months of last dose of ACCC (Group 3, n = 233); and progressive disease within 12 months of last dose of ACCC (Group 4, n = 272). Second- and third-line therapies administered to these patients included methotrexate, doxorubicin, mitoxantrone, bisantrene, vinblastine, vindesine, melphalan, mitomycin, cisplatin, etoposide and others, but not taxanes. The distribution of patients' characteristics was similar between the four groups, as was the use of second- and third-line regimens. Response rate (RR) to second-line chemotherapy were 5% and 7.7% for Group 1 and Group 2 respectively. In contrast, RR to second-line chemotherapy were 21.6% and 15% for Group 3 and 4. The differences in response rate between the combination of Groups 1 and 2 and Groups 3 or 4 were significant (P = 0.005 and P = 0.04 respectively). These results indicate that strictly defined anthracycline resistance as defined in Groups 1 and 2 is associated with resistance to many other cytotoxic drugs. The definitions used in Groups 3 and 4 include many patients with responsive tumours, and a more favourable prognosis. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2363337 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2000 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-23633372009-09-10 A unified definition of clinical anthracycline resistance breast cancer Pivot, X Asmar, L Buzdar, A U Valero, V Hortobagyi, G Br J Cancer Regular Article The purpose of the study was to determine the response rates (RR) and duration to second- and third-line chemotherapy programmes in patients with anthracycline-resistant breast cancer, utilizing various definitions of anthracycline resistance. This was a retrospective analysis performed on 1335 patients with metastatic breast cancer who participated in consecutive clinical trials of first line, anthracycline-containing combination chemotherapy (ACCC) at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center between July 1973 and April 1980. Anthracycline-resistant groups were identified using definitions of anthracycline resistance found in the literature: progressive disease as best response to ACCC (Group 1, n = 56 patients); progressive disease while receiving ACCC after an intervening response to the drug (Group 2, n = 84); progressive disease within 6 months of last dose of ACCC (Group 3, n = 233); and progressive disease within 12 months of last dose of ACCC (Group 4, n = 272). Second- and third-line therapies administered to these patients included methotrexate, doxorubicin, mitoxantrone, bisantrene, vinblastine, vindesine, melphalan, mitomycin, cisplatin, etoposide and others, but not taxanes. The distribution of patients' characteristics was similar between the four groups, as was the use of second- and third-line regimens. Response rate (RR) to second-line chemotherapy were 5% and 7.7% for Group 1 and Group 2 respectively. In contrast, RR to second-line chemotherapy were 21.6% and 15% for Group 3 and 4. The differences in response rate between the combination of Groups 1 and 2 and Groups 3 or 4 were significant (P = 0.005 and P = 0.04 respectively). These results indicate that strictly defined anthracycline resistance as defined in Groups 1 and 2 is associated with resistance to many other cytotoxic drugs. The definitions used in Groups 3 and 4 include many patients with responsive tumours, and a more favourable prognosis. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign Nature Publishing Group 2000-02 2000-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC2363337/ /pubmed/10682660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.1999.0958 Text en Copyright © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Regular Article Pivot, X Asmar, L Buzdar, A U Valero, V Hortobagyi, G A unified definition of clinical anthracycline resistance breast cancer |
title | A unified definition of clinical anthracycline resistance breast cancer |
title_full | A unified definition of clinical anthracycline resistance breast cancer |
title_fullStr | A unified definition of clinical anthracycline resistance breast cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | A unified definition of clinical anthracycline resistance breast cancer |
title_short | A unified definition of clinical anthracycline resistance breast cancer |
title_sort | unified definition of clinical anthracycline resistance breast cancer |
topic | Regular Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2363337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10682660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.1999.0958 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pivotx aunifieddefinitionofclinicalanthracyclineresistancebreastcancer AT asmarl aunifieddefinitionofclinicalanthracyclineresistancebreastcancer AT buzdarau aunifieddefinitionofclinicalanthracyclineresistancebreastcancer AT valerov aunifieddefinitionofclinicalanthracyclineresistancebreastcancer AT hortobagyig aunifieddefinitionofclinicalanthracyclineresistancebreastcancer AT pivotx unifieddefinitionofclinicalanthracyclineresistancebreastcancer AT asmarl unifieddefinitionofclinicalanthracyclineresistancebreastcancer AT buzdarau unifieddefinitionofclinicalanthracyclineresistancebreastcancer AT valerov unifieddefinitionofclinicalanthracyclineresistancebreastcancer AT hortobagyig unifieddefinitionofclinicalanthracyclineresistancebreastcancer |