Cargando…
A Medical Research Council randomized trial of single agent carboplatin versus etoposide and cisplatin for advanced metastatic seminoma
The UK Medical Research Council conducted this trial of carboplatin chemotherapy in advanced seminoma to compare single agent carboplatin with a standard combination of etoposide with cisplatin. The use of single agent carboplatin was expected to be associated with reduced toxicity. A total of 130 p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2000
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2363456/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11104556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1498 |
_version_ | 1782153709198770176 |
---|---|
author | Horwich, A Oliver, R T D Wilkinson, P M Mead, G M Harland, S J Cullen, M H Roberts, J T Fossa, S D Dearnaley, D P Lallemand, E Stenning, S P |
author_facet | Horwich, A Oliver, R T D Wilkinson, P M Mead, G M Harland, S J Cullen, M H Roberts, J T Fossa, S D Dearnaley, D P Lallemand, E Stenning, S P |
author_sort | Horwich, A |
collection | PubMed |
description | The UK Medical Research Council conducted this trial of carboplatin chemotherapy in advanced seminoma to compare single agent carboplatin with a standard combination of etoposide with cisplatin. The use of single agent carboplatin was expected to be associated with reduced toxicity. A total of 130 patients with advanced seminoma were randomly assigned to treatment with either single agent carboplatin (C) at a dose of 400 mg/m(2) to be corrected for glomerular filtration rate outside the range 81–120 ml min(–1) and to be administered on day 1 of a 21 day cycle to a total of 4 cycles or to etoposide + platinum (EP). The trial was designed as an equivalence study aiming to exclude a reduction in the 3-year progression-free survival in patients allocated to carboplatin of between 10 and 15%, requiring initially a target accrual of 250 patients (90% power significance level 5% (one-sided)). The trial closed after 130 patients had been randomized following recommendation by an independent data monitoring committee. At a median follow-up time of 4.5 years, 81% of patients had been followed up for at least 3 years and 19 patients have died. The estimated PFS rate (95% Confidence Intervals (CI)) at 3 years was 71% (60–82%) in patients allocated C and 81% (71–90%) in those allocated EP; the 95% CI for the difference in 3 year PFS was – 6% to +19%. The hazard ratio of 0.64 (95% CI 0.32–1.28) favoured EP but the difference was not statistically significant (log rank chi-squared = 1.59 P = 0.21). The 3-year survival rate was 84% (75–92%) in those allocated C, and 89% (81–96%) in those allocated EP. The hazard ratio for survival was 0.85 with 95% CI, 0.35–2.10, log rank chi-squared = 0.12, P = 0.73. The trial has not demonstrated statistically significant differences in the major survival endpoints comparing single agent carboplatin with a combination of etoposide + cisplatin. This cannot be taken as an indication of equivalence since the limited size of this trial rendered it unable to exclude a 19% lower progression-free survival and survival in those treated with single agent carboplatin which would be important clinically. Standard initial chemotherapy for advanced seminoma should be based on cisplatin combinations and the role of carboplatin awaits the outcome of further studies. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign http://www.bjcancer.com |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2363456 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2000 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-23634562009-09-10 A Medical Research Council randomized trial of single agent carboplatin versus etoposide and cisplatin for advanced metastatic seminoma Horwich, A Oliver, R T D Wilkinson, P M Mead, G M Harland, S J Cullen, M H Roberts, J T Fossa, S D Dearnaley, D P Lallemand, E Stenning, S P Br J Cancer Regular Article The UK Medical Research Council conducted this trial of carboplatin chemotherapy in advanced seminoma to compare single agent carboplatin with a standard combination of etoposide with cisplatin. The use of single agent carboplatin was expected to be associated with reduced toxicity. A total of 130 patients with advanced seminoma were randomly assigned to treatment with either single agent carboplatin (C) at a dose of 400 mg/m(2) to be corrected for glomerular filtration rate outside the range 81–120 ml min(–1) and to be administered on day 1 of a 21 day cycle to a total of 4 cycles or to etoposide + platinum (EP). The trial was designed as an equivalence study aiming to exclude a reduction in the 3-year progression-free survival in patients allocated to carboplatin of between 10 and 15%, requiring initially a target accrual of 250 patients (90% power significance level 5% (one-sided)). The trial closed after 130 patients had been randomized following recommendation by an independent data monitoring committee. At a median follow-up time of 4.5 years, 81% of patients had been followed up for at least 3 years and 19 patients have died. The estimated PFS rate (95% Confidence Intervals (CI)) at 3 years was 71% (60–82%) in patients allocated C and 81% (71–90%) in those allocated EP; the 95% CI for the difference in 3 year PFS was – 6% to +19%. The hazard ratio of 0.64 (95% CI 0.32–1.28) favoured EP but the difference was not statistically significant (log rank chi-squared = 1.59 P = 0.21). The 3-year survival rate was 84% (75–92%) in those allocated C, and 89% (81–96%) in those allocated EP. The hazard ratio for survival was 0.85 with 95% CI, 0.35–2.10, log rank chi-squared = 0.12, P = 0.73. The trial has not demonstrated statistically significant differences in the major survival endpoints comparing single agent carboplatin with a combination of etoposide + cisplatin. This cannot be taken as an indication of equivalence since the limited size of this trial rendered it unable to exclude a 19% lower progression-free survival and survival in those treated with single agent carboplatin which would be important clinically. Standard initial chemotherapy for advanced seminoma should be based on cisplatin combinations and the role of carboplatin awaits the outcome of further studies. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign http://www.bjcancer.com Nature Publishing Group 2000-12 /pmc/articles/PMC2363456/ /pubmed/11104556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1498 Text en Copyright © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Regular Article Horwich, A Oliver, R T D Wilkinson, P M Mead, G M Harland, S J Cullen, M H Roberts, J T Fossa, S D Dearnaley, D P Lallemand, E Stenning, S P A Medical Research Council randomized trial of single agent carboplatin versus etoposide and cisplatin for advanced metastatic seminoma |
title | A Medical Research Council randomized trial of single agent carboplatin versus etoposide and cisplatin for advanced metastatic seminoma |
title_full | A Medical Research Council randomized trial of single agent carboplatin versus etoposide and cisplatin for advanced metastatic seminoma |
title_fullStr | A Medical Research Council randomized trial of single agent carboplatin versus etoposide and cisplatin for advanced metastatic seminoma |
title_full_unstemmed | A Medical Research Council randomized trial of single agent carboplatin versus etoposide and cisplatin for advanced metastatic seminoma |
title_short | A Medical Research Council randomized trial of single agent carboplatin versus etoposide and cisplatin for advanced metastatic seminoma |
title_sort | medical research council randomized trial of single agent carboplatin versus etoposide and cisplatin for advanced metastatic seminoma |
topic | Regular Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2363456/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11104556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1498 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT horwicha amedicalresearchcouncilrandomizedtrialofsingleagentcarboplatinversusetoposideandcisplatinforadvancedmetastaticseminoma AT oliverrtd amedicalresearchcouncilrandomizedtrialofsingleagentcarboplatinversusetoposideandcisplatinforadvancedmetastaticseminoma AT wilkinsonpm amedicalresearchcouncilrandomizedtrialofsingleagentcarboplatinversusetoposideandcisplatinforadvancedmetastaticseminoma AT meadgm amedicalresearchcouncilrandomizedtrialofsingleagentcarboplatinversusetoposideandcisplatinforadvancedmetastaticseminoma AT harlandsj amedicalresearchcouncilrandomizedtrialofsingleagentcarboplatinversusetoposideandcisplatinforadvancedmetastaticseminoma AT cullenmh amedicalresearchcouncilrandomizedtrialofsingleagentcarboplatinversusetoposideandcisplatinforadvancedmetastaticseminoma AT robertsjt amedicalresearchcouncilrandomizedtrialofsingleagentcarboplatinversusetoposideandcisplatinforadvancedmetastaticseminoma AT fossasd amedicalresearchcouncilrandomizedtrialofsingleagentcarboplatinversusetoposideandcisplatinforadvancedmetastaticseminoma AT dearnaleydp amedicalresearchcouncilrandomizedtrialofsingleagentcarboplatinversusetoposideandcisplatinforadvancedmetastaticseminoma AT lallemande amedicalresearchcouncilrandomizedtrialofsingleagentcarboplatinversusetoposideandcisplatinforadvancedmetastaticseminoma AT stenningsp amedicalresearchcouncilrandomizedtrialofsingleagentcarboplatinversusetoposideandcisplatinforadvancedmetastaticseminoma AT horwicha medicalresearchcouncilrandomizedtrialofsingleagentcarboplatinversusetoposideandcisplatinforadvancedmetastaticseminoma AT oliverrtd medicalresearchcouncilrandomizedtrialofsingleagentcarboplatinversusetoposideandcisplatinforadvancedmetastaticseminoma AT wilkinsonpm medicalresearchcouncilrandomizedtrialofsingleagentcarboplatinversusetoposideandcisplatinforadvancedmetastaticseminoma AT meadgm medicalresearchcouncilrandomizedtrialofsingleagentcarboplatinversusetoposideandcisplatinforadvancedmetastaticseminoma AT harlandsj medicalresearchcouncilrandomizedtrialofsingleagentcarboplatinversusetoposideandcisplatinforadvancedmetastaticseminoma AT cullenmh medicalresearchcouncilrandomizedtrialofsingleagentcarboplatinversusetoposideandcisplatinforadvancedmetastaticseminoma AT robertsjt medicalresearchcouncilrandomizedtrialofsingleagentcarboplatinversusetoposideandcisplatinforadvancedmetastaticseminoma AT fossasd medicalresearchcouncilrandomizedtrialofsingleagentcarboplatinversusetoposideandcisplatinforadvancedmetastaticseminoma AT dearnaleydp medicalresearchcouncilrandomizedtrialofsingleagentcarboplatinversusetoposideandcisplatinforadvancedmetastaticseminoma AT lallemande medicalresearchcouncilrandomizedtrialofsingleagentcarboplatinversusetoposideandcisplatinforadvancedmetastaticseminoma AT stenningsp medicalresearchcouncilrandomizedtrialofsingleagentcarboplatinversusetoposideandcisplatinforadvancedmetastaticseminoma |