Cargando…

A Medical Research Council randomized trial of single agent carboplatin versus etoposide and cisplatin for advanced metastatic seminoma

The UK Medical Research Council conducted this trial of carboplatin chemotherapy in advanced seminoma to compare single agent carboplatin with a standard combination of etoposide with cisplatin. The use of single agent carboplatin was expected to be associated with reduced toxicity. A total of 130 p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Horwich, A, Oliver, R T D, Wilkinson, P M, Mead, G M, Harland, S J, Cullen, M H, Roberts, J T, Fossa, S D, Dearnaley, D P, Lallemand, E, Stenning, S P
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2000
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2363456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11104556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1498
_version_ 1782153709198770176
author Horwich, A
Oliver, R T D
Wilkinson, P M
Mead, G M
Harland, S J
Cullen, M H
Roberts, J T
Fossa, S D
Dearnaley, D P
Lallemand, E
Stenning, S P
author_facet Horwich, A
Oliver, R T D
Wilkinson, P M
Mead, G M
Harland, S J
Cullen, M H
Roberts, J T
Fossa, S D
Dearnaley, D P
Lallemand, E
Stenning, S P
author_sort Horwich, A
collection PubMed
description The UK Medical Research Council conducted this trial of carboplatin chemotherapy in advanced seminoma to compare single agent carboplatin with a standard combination of etoposide with cisplatin. The use of single agent carboplatin was expected to be associated with reduced toxicity. A total of 130 patients with advanced seminoma were randomly assigned to treatment with either single agent carboplatin (C) at a dose of 400 mg/m(2) to be corrected for glomerular filtration rate outside the range 81–120 ml min(–1) and to be administered on day 1 of a 21 day cycle to a total of 4 cycles or to etoposide + platinum (EP). The trial was designed as an equivalence study aiming to exclude a reduction in the 3-year progression-free survival in patients allocated to carboplatin of between 10 and 15%, requiring initially a target accrual of 250 patients (90% power significance level 5% (one-sided)). The trial closed after 130 patients had been randomized following recommendation by an independent data monitoring committee. At a median follow-up time of 4.5 years, 81% of patients had been followed up for at least 3 years and 19 patients have died. The estimated PFS rate (95% Confidence Intervals (CI)) at 3 years was 71% (60–82%) in patients allocated C and 81% (71–90%) in those allocated EP; the 95% CI for the difference in 3 year PFS was – 6% to +19%. The hazard ratio of 0.64 (95% CI 0.32–1.28) favoured EP but the difference was not statistically significant (log rank chi-squared = 1.59 P = 0.21). The 3-year survival rate was 84% (75–92%) in those allocated C, and 89% (81–96%) in those allocated EP. The hazard ratio for survival was 0.85 with 95% CI, 0.35–2.10, log rank chi-squared = 0.12, P = 0.73. The trial has not demonstrated statistically significant differences in the major survival endpoints comparing single agent carboplatin with a combination of etoposide + cisplatin. This cannot be taken as an indication of equivalence since the limited size of this trial rendered it unable to exclude a 19% lower progression-free survival and survival in those treated with single agent carboplatin which would be important clinically. Standard initial chemotherapy for advanced seminoma should be based on cisplatin combinations and the role of carboplatin awaits the outcome of further studies. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign http://www.bjcancer.com
format Text
id pubmed-2363456
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2000
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23634562009-09-10 A Medical Research Council randomized trial of single agent carboplatin versus etoposide and cisplatin for advanced metastatic seminoma Horwich, A Oliver, R T D Wilkinson, P M Mead, G M Harland, S J Cullen, M H Roberts, J T Fossa, S D Dearnaley, D P Lallemand, E Stenning, S P Br J Cancer Regular Article The UK Medical Research Council conducted this trial of carboplatin chemotherapy in advanced seminoma to compare single agent carboplatin with a standard combination of etoposide with cisplatin. The use of single agent carboplatin was expected to be associated with reduced toxicity. A total of 130 patients with advanced seminoma were randomly assigned to treatment with either single agent carboplatin (C) at a dose of 400 mg/m(2) to be corrected for glomerular filtration rate outside the range 81–120 ml min(–1) and to be administered on day 1 of a 21 day cycle to a total of 4 cycles or to etoposide + platinum (EP). The trial was designed as an equivalence study aiming to exclude a reduction in the 3-year progression-free survival in patients allocated to carboplatin of between 10 and 15%, requiring initially a target accrual of 250 patients (90% power significance level 5% (one-sided)). The trial closed after 130 patients had been randomized following recommendation by an independent data monitoring committee. At a median follow-up time of 4.5 years, 81% of patients had been followed up for at least 3 years and 19 patients have died. The estimated PFS rate (95% Confidence Intervals (CI)) at 3 years was 71% (60–82%) in patients allocated C and 81% (71–90%) in those allocated EP; the 95% CI for the difference in 3 year PFS was – 6% to +19%. The hazard ratio of 0.64 (95% CI 0.32–1.28) favoured EP but the difference was not statistically significant (log rank chi-squared = 1.59 P = 0.21). The 3-year survival rate was 84% (75–92%) in those allocated C, and 89% (81–96%) in those allocated EP. The hazard ratio for survival was 0.85 with 95% CI, 0.35–2.10, log rank chi-squared = 0.12, P = 0.73. The trial has not demonstrated statistically significant differences in the major survival endpoints comparing single agent carboplatin with a combination of etoposide + cisplatin. This cannot be taken as an indication of equivalence since the limited size of this trial rendered it unable to exclude a 19% lower progression-free survival and survival in those treated with single agent carboplatin which would be important clinically. Standard initial chemotherapy for advanced seminoma should be based on cisplatin combinations and the role of carboplatin awaits the outcome of further studies. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign http://www.bjcancer.com Nature Publishing Group 2000-12 /pmc/articles/PMC2363456/ /pubmed/11104556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1498 Text en Copyright © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Regular Article
Horwich, A
Oliver, R T D
Wilkinson, P M
Mead, G M
Harland, S J
Cullen, M H
Roberts, J T
Fossa, S D
Dearnaley, D P
Lallemand, E
Stenning, S P
A Medical Research Council randomized trial of single agent carboplatin versus etoposide and cisplatin for advanced metastatic seminoma
title A Medical Research Council randomized trial of single agent carboplatin versus etoposide and cisplatin for advanced metastatic seminoma
title_full A Medical Research Council randomized trial of single agent carboplatin versus etoposide and cisplatin for advanced metastatic seminoma
title_fullStr A Medical Research Council randomized trial of single agent carboplatin versus etoposide and cisplatin for advanced metastatic seminoma
title_full_unstemmed A Medical Research Council randomized trial of single agent carboplatin versus etoposide and cisplatin for advanced metastatic seminoma
title_short A Medical Research Council randomized trial of single agent carboplatin versus etoposide and cisplatin for advanced metastatic seminoma
title_sort medical research council randomized trial of single agent carboplatin versus etoposide and cisplatin for advanced metastatic seminoma
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2363456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11104556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1498
work_keys_str_mv AT horwicha amedicalresearchcouncilrandomizedtrialofsingleagentcarboplatinversusetoposideandcisplatinforadvancedmetastaticseminoma
AT oliverrtd amedicalresearchcouncilrandomizedtrialofsingleagentcarboplatinversusetoposideandcisplatinforadvancedmetastaticseminoma
AT wilkinsonpm amedicalresearchcouncilrandomizedtrialofsingleagentcarboplatinversusetoposideandcisplatinforadvancedmetastaticseminoma
AT meadgm amedicalresearchcouncilrandomizedtrialofsingleagentcarboplatinversusetoposideandcisplatinforadvancedmetastaticseminoma
AT harlandsj amedicalresearchcouncilrandomizedtrialofsingleagentcarboplatinversusetoposideandcisplatinforadvancedmetastaticseminoma
AT cullenmh amedicalresearchcouncilrandomizedtrialofsingleagentcarboplatinversusetoposideandcisplatinforadvancedmetastaticseminoma
AT robertsjt amedicalresearchcouncilrandomizedtrialofsingleagentcarboplatinversusetoposideandcisplatinforadvancedmetastaticseminoma
AT fossasd amedicalresearchcouncilrandomizedtrialofsingleagentcarboplatinversusetoposideandcisplatinforadvancedmetastaticseminoma
AT dearnaleydp amedicalresearchcouncilrandomizedtrialofsingleagentcarboplatinversusetoposideandcisplatinforadvancedmetastaticseminoma
AT lallemande amedicalresearchcouncilrandomizedtrialofsingleagentcarboplatinversusetoposideandcisplatinforadvancedmetastaticseminoma
AT stenningsp amedicalresearchcouncilrandomizedtrialofsingleagentcarboplatinversusetoposideandcisplatinforadvancedmetastaticseminoma
AT horwicha medicalresearchcouncilrandomizedtrialofsingleagentcarboplatinversusetoposideandcisplatinforadvancedmetastaticseminoma
AT oliverrtd medicalresearchcouncilrandomizedtrialofsingleagentcarboplatinversusetoposideandcisplatinforadvancedmetastaticseminoma
AT wilkinsonpm medicalresearchcouncilrandomizedtrialofsingleagentcarboplatinversusetoposideandcisplatinforadvancedmetastaticseminoma
AT meadgm medicalresearchcouncilrandomizedtrialofsingleagentcarboplatinversusetoposideandcisplatinforadvancedmetastaticseminoma
AT harlandsj medicalresearchcouncilrandomizedtrialofsingleagentcarboplatinversusetoposideandcisplatinforadvancedmetastaticseminoma
AT cullenmh medicalresearchcouncilrandomizedtrialofsingleagentcarboplatinversusetoposideandcisplatinforadvancedmetastaticseminoma
AT robertsjt medicalresearchcouncilrandomizedtrialofsingleagentcarboplatinversusetoposideandcisplatinforadvancedmetastaticseminoma
AT fossasd medicalresearchcouncilrandomizedtrialofsingleagentcarboplatinversusetoposideandcisplatinforadvancedmetastaticseminoma
AT dearnaleydp medicalresearchcouncilrandomizedtrialofsingleagentcarboplatinversusetoposideandcisplatinforadvancedmetastaticseminoma
AT lallemande medicalresearchcouncilrandomizedtrialofsingleagentcarboplatinversusetoposideandcisplatinforadvancedmetastaticseminoma
AT stenningsp medicalresearchcouncilrandomizedtrialofsingleagentcarboplatinversusetoposideandcisplatinforadvancedmetastaticseminoma