Cargando…
A pooled analysis of magnetic fields and childhood leukaemia
Previous studies have suggested an association between exposure to 50–60 Hz magnetic fields (EMF) and childhood leukaemia. We conducted a pooled analysis based on individual records from nine studies, including the most recent ones. Studies with 24/48-hour magnetic field measurements or calculated m...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2000
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2363518/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10944614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1376 |
_version_ | 1782153724738666496 |
---|---|
author | Ahlbom, A Day, N Feychting, M Roman, E Skinner, J Dockerty, J Linet, M McBride, M Michaelis, J Olsen, J H Tynes, T Verkasalo, P K |
author_facet | Ahlbom, A Day, N Feychting, M Roman, E Skinner, J Dockerty, J Linet, M McBride, M Michaelis, J Olsen, J H Tynes, T Verkasalo, P K |
author_sort | Ahlbom, A |
collection | PubMed |
description | Previous studies have suggested an association between exposure to 50–60 Hz magnetic fields (EMF) and childhood leukaemia. We conducted a pooled analysis based on individual records from nine studies, including the most recent ones. Studies with 24/48-hour magnetic field measurements or calculated magnetic fields were included. We specified which data analyses we planned to do and how to do them before we commenced the work. The use of individual records allowed us to use the same exposure definitions, and the large numbers of subjects enabled more precise estimation of risks at high exposure levels. For the 3203 children with leukaemia and 10 338 control children with estimated residential magnetic field exposures levels < 0.4 μT, we observed risk estimates near the no effect level, while for the 44 children with leukaemia and 62 control children with estimated residential magnetic field exposures ≥ 0.4 μT the estimated summary relative risk was 2.00 (1.27–3.13), P value = 0.002). Adjustment for potential confounding variables did not appreciably change the results. For North American subjects whose residences were in the highest wire code category, the estimated summary relative risk was 1.24 (0.82–1.87). Thus, we found no evidence in the combined data for the existence of the so-called wire-code paradox. In summary, the 99.2% of children residing in homes with exposure levels < 0.4 μT had estimates compatible with no increased risk, while the 0.8% of children with exposures ≥ 0.4 μT had a relative risk estimate of approximately 2, which is unlikely to be due to random variability. The explanation for the elevated risk is unknown, but selection bias may have accounted for some of the increase. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2363518 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2000 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-23635182009-09-10 A pooled analysis of magnetic fields and childhood leukaemia Ahlbom, A Day, N Feychting, M Roman, E Skinner, J Dockerty, J Linet, M McBride, M Michaelis, J Olsen, J H Tynes, T Verkasalo, P K Br J Cancer Regular Article Previous studies have suggested an association between exposure to 50–60 Hz magnetic fields (EMF) and childhood leukaemia. We conducted a pooled analysis based on individual records from nine studies, including the most recent ones. Studies with 24/48-hour magnetic field measurements or calculated magnetic fields were included. We specified which data analyses we planned to do and how to do them before we commenced the work. The use of individual records allowed us to use the same exposure definitions, and the large numbers of subjects enabled more precise estimation of risks at high exposure levels. For the 3203 children with leukaemia and 10 338 control children with estimated residential magnetic field exposures levels < 0.4 μT, we observed risk estimates near the no effect level, while for the 44 children with leukaemia and 62 control children with estimated residential magnetic field exposures ≥ 0.4 μT the estimated summary relative risk was 2.00 (1.27–3.13), P value = 0.002). Adjustment for potential confounding variables did not appreciably change the results. For North American subjects whose residences were in the highest wire code category, the estimated summary relative risk was 1.24 (0.82–1.87). Thus, we found no evidence in the combined data for the existence of the so-called wire-code paradox. In summary, the 99.2% of children residing in homes with exposure levels < 0.4 μT had estimates compatible with no increased risk, while the 0.8% of children with exposures ≥ 0.4 μT had a relative risk estimate of approximately 2, which is unlikely to be due to random variability. The explanation for the elevated risk is unknown, but selection bias may have accounted for some of the increase. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign Nature Publishing Group 2000-09 2000-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC2363518/ /pubmed/10944614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1376 Text en Copyright © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Regular Article Ahlbom, A Day, N Feychting, M Roman, E Skinner, J Dockerty, J Linet, M McBride, M Michaelis, J Olsen, J H Tynes, T Verkasalo, P K A pooled analysis of magnetic fields and childhood leukaemia |
title | A pooled analysis of magnetic fields and childhood leukaemia |
title_full | A pooled analysis of magnetic fields and childhood leukaemia |
title_fullStr | A pooled analysis of magnetic fields and childhood leukaemia |
title_full_unstemmed | A pooled analysis of magnetic fields and childhood leukaemia |
title_short | A pooled analysis of magnetic fields and childhood leukaemia |
title_sort | pooled analysis of magnetic fields and childhood leukaemia |
topic | Regular Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2363518/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10944614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1376 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ahlboma apooledanalysisofmagneticfieldsandchildhoodleukaemia AT dayn apooledanalysisofmagneticfieldsandchildhoodleukaemia AT feychtingm apooledanalysisofmagneticfieldsandchildhoodleukaemia AT romane apooledanalysisofmagneticfieldsandchildhoodleukaemia AT skinnerj apooledanalysisofmagneticfieldsandchildhoodleukaemia AT dockertyj apooledanalysisofmagneticfieldsandchildhoodleukaemia AT linetm apooledanalysisofmagneticfieldsandchildhoodleukaemia AT mcbridem apooledanalysisofmagneticfieldsandchildhoodleukaemia AT michaelisj apooledanalysisofmagneticfieldsandchildhoodleukaemia AT olsenjh apooledanalysisofmagneticfieldsandchildhoodleukaemia AT tynest apooledanalysisofmagneticfieldsandchildhoodleukaemia AT verkasalopk apooledanalysisofmagneticfieldsandchildhoodleukaemia AT ahlboma pooledanalysisofmagneticfieldsandchildhoodleukaemia AT dayn pooledanalysisofmagneticfieldsandchildhoodleukaemia AT feychtingm pooledanalysisofmagneticfieldsandchildhoodleukaemia AT romane pooledanalysisofmagneticfieldsandchildhoodleukaemia AT skinnerj pooledanalysisofmagneticfieldsandchildhoodleukaemia AT dockertyj pooledanalysisofmagneticfieldsandchildhoodleukaemia AT linetm pooledanalysisofmagneticfieldsandchildhoodleukaemia AT mcbridem pooledanalysisofmagneticfieldsandchildhoodleukaemia AT michaelisj pooledanalysisofmagneticfieldsandchildhoodleukaemia AT olsenjh pooledanalysisofmagneticfieldsandchildhoodleukaemia AT tynest pooledanalysisofmagneticfieldsandchildhoodleukaemia AT verkasalopk pooledanalysisofmagneticfieldsandchildhoodleukaemia |