Cargando…

Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study of three different doses

Our aim was to study the activity and toxicity of the gemcitabine plus vinorelbine (Gem Vin) combination and to identify the optimal dose. Previously untreated patients aged < 70 years, with stage IV or IIIb (not candidates for radiotherapy) non-small cell lung cancer were eligible. Studied dose-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gridelli, C, Frontini, L, Perrone, F, Gallo, C, Gulisano, M, Cigolari, S, Castiglione, F, Robbiati, S F, Gasparini, G, Ianniello, G P, Farris, A, Locatelli, M C, Felletti, R, Piazza, E
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2000
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2363528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10952772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1341
_version_ 1782153727192334336
author Gridelli, C
Frontini, L
Perrone, F
Gallo, C
Gulisano, M
Cigolari, S
Castiglione, F
Robbiati, S F
Gasparini, G
Ianniello, G P
Farris, A
Locatelli, M C
Felletti, R
Piazza, E
author_facet Gridelli, C
Frontini, L
Perrone, F
Gallo, C
Gulisano, M
Cigolari, S
Castiglione, F
Robbiati, S F
Gasparini, G
Ianniello, G P
Farris, A
Locatelli, M C
Felletti, R
Piazza, E
author_sort Gridelli, C
collection PubMed
description Our aim was to study the activity and toxicity of the gemcitabine plus vinorelbine (Gem Vin) combination and to identify the optimal dose. Previously untreated patients aged < 70 years, with stage IV or IIIb (not candidates for radiotherapy) non-small cell lung cancer were eligible. Studied dose-levels of Gem Vin, administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks, were (mg m(–2)): level I = 1000/25; level II = 1200/25; level III = 1000/30; level IV = 1200/30. A feasibility study was performed at each dose-level, followed by a single-stage phase II study. Dose-level IV was unfeasible because of grade 4 neutropenia. Overall, out of 126 patients enrolled in phase II studies, there were one complete and 32 partial responses (response rate 26%: 95% CI 18–34%). Response rates were 27.9%, 21.4% and 29.3% at levels I, II and III, respectively. The treatment was well tolerated. Toxicity was less frequent and severe at level I. Overall median survival was 33 weeks (95% CI 28–40). Descriptive quality of life analysis showed that patients with a worse baseline global health status score tended to drop out of the study earlier than those with a better score. Gem Vin is feasible at different doses. It is sufficiently active and well tolerated. A phase III study to compare the effect on quality of life of Gem Vin (level I) vs cisplatin-based chemotherapy is ongoing. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign
format Text
id pubmed-2363528
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2000
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23635282009-09-10 Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study of three different doses Gridelli, C Frontini, L Perrone, F Gallo, C Gulisano, M Cigolari, S Castiglione, F Robbiati, S F Gasparini, G Ianniello, G P Farris, A Locatelli, M C Felletti, R Piazza, E Br J Cancer Regular Article Our aim was to study the activity and toxicity of the gemcitabine plus vinorelbine (Gem Vin) combination and to identify the optimal dose. Previously untreated patients aged < 70 years, with stage IV or IIIb (not candidates for radiotherapy) non-small cell lung cancer were eligible. Studied dose-levels of Gem Vin, administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks, were (mg m(–2)): level I = 1000/25; level II = 1200/25; level III = 1000/30; level IV = 1200/30. A feasibility study was performed at each dose-level, followed by a single-stage phase II study. Dose-level IV was unfeasible because of grade 4 neutropenia. Overall, out of 126 patients enrolled in phase II studies, there were one complete and 32 partial responses (response rate 26%: 95% CI 18–34%). Response rates were 27.9%, 21.4% and 29.3% at levels I, II and III, respectively. The treatment was well tolerated. Toxicity was less frequent and severe at level I. Overall median survival was 33 weeks (95% CI 28–40). Descriptive quality of life analysis showed that patients with a worse baseline global health status score tended to drop out of the study earlier than those with a better score. Gem Vin is feasible at different doses. It is sufficiently active and well tolerated. A phase III study to compare the effect on quality of life of Gem Vin (level I) vs cisplatin-based chemotherapy is ongoing. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign Nature Publishing Group 2000-09 2000-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC2363528/ /pubmed/10952772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1341 Text en Copyright © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Regular Article
Gridelli, C
Frontini, L
Perrone, F
Gallo, C
Gulisano, M
Cigolari, S
Castiglione, F
Robbiati, S F
Gasparini, G
Ianniello, G P
Farris, A
Locatelli, M C
Felletti, R
Piazza, E
Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study of three different doses
title Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study of three different doses
title_full Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study of three different doses
title_fullStr Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study of three different doses
title_full_unstemmed Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study of three different doses
title_short Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study of three different doses
title_sort gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase ii study of three different doses
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2363528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10952772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1341
work_keys_str_mv AT gridellic gemcitabineplusvinorelbineinadvancednonsmallcelllungcanceraphaseiistudyofthreedifferentdoses
AT frontinil gemcitabineplusvinorelbineinadvancednonsmallcelllungcanceraphaseiistudyofthreedifferentdoses
AT perronef gemcitabineplusvinorelbineinadvancednonsmallcelllungcanceraphaseiistudyofthreedifferentdoses
AT galloc gemcitabineplusvinorelbineinadvancednonsmallcelllungcanceraphaseiistudyofthreedifferentdoses
AT gulisanom gemcitabineplusvinorelbineinadvancednonsmallcelllungcanceraphaseiistudyofthreedifferentdoses
AT cigolaris gemcitabineplusvinorelbineinadvancednonsmallcelllungcanceraphaseiistudyofthreedifferentdoses
AT castiglionef gemcitabineplusvinorelbineinadvancednonsmallcelllungcanceraphaseiistudyofthreedifferentdoses
AT robbiatisf gemcitabineplusvinorelbineinadvancednonsmallcelllungcanceraphaseiistudyofthreedifferentdoses
AT gasparinig gemcitabineplusvinorelbineinadvancednonsmallcelllungcanceraphaseiistudyofthreedifferentdoses
AT ianniellogp gemcitabineplusvinorelbineinadvancednonsmallcelllungcanceraphaseiistudyofthreedifferentdoses
AT farrisa gemcitabineplusvinorelbineinadvancednonsmallcelllungcanceraphaseiistudyofthreedifferentdoses
AT locatellimc gemcitabineplusvinorelbineinadvancednonsmallcelllungcanceraphaseiistudyofthreedifferentdoses
AT fellettir gemcitabineplusvinorelbineinadvancednonsmallcelllungcanceraphaseiistudyofthreedifferentdoses
AT piazzae gemcitabineplusvinorelbineinadvancednonsmallcelllungcanceraphaseiistudyofthreedifferentdoses
AT gemcitabineplusvinorelbineinadvancednonsmallcelllungcanceraphaseiistudyofthreedifferentdoses
AT gemcitabineplusvinorelbineinadvancednonsmallcelllungcanceraphaseiistudyofthreedifferentdoses