Cargando…
Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study of three different doses
Our aim was to study the activity and toxicity of the gemcitabine plus vinorelbine (Gem Vin) combination and to identify the optimal dose. Previously untreated patients aged < 70 years, with stage IV or IIIb (not candidates for radiotherapy) non-small cell lung cancer were eligible. Studied dose-...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2000
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2363528/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10952772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1341 |
_version_ | 1782153727192334336 |
---|---|
author | Gridelli, C Frontini, L Perrone, F Gallo, C Gulisano, M Cigolari, S Castiglione, F Robbiati, S F Gasparini, G Ianniello, G P Farris, A Locatelli, M C Felletti, R Piazza, E |
author_facet | Gridelli, C Frontini, L Perrone, F Gallo, C Gulisano, M Cigolari, S Castiglione, F Robbiati, S F Gasparini, G Ianniello, G P Farris, A Locatelli, M C Felletti, R Piazza, E |
author_sort | Gridelli, C |
collection | PubMed |
description | Our aim was to study the activity and toxicity of the gemcitabine plus vinorelbine (Gem Vin) combination and to identify the optimal dose. Previously untreated patients aged < 70 years, with stage IV or IIIb (not candidates for radiotherapy) non-small cell lung cancer were eligible. Studied dose-levels of Gem Vin, administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks, were (mg m(–2)): level I = 1000/25; level II = 1200/25; level III = 1000/30; level IV = 1200/30. A feasibility study was performed at each dose-level, followed by a single-stage phase II study. Dose-level IV was unfeasible because of grade 4 neutropenia. Overall, out of 126 patients enrolled in phase II studies, there were one complete and 32 partial responses (response rate 26%: 95% CI 18–34%). Response rates were 27.9%, 21.4% and 29.3% at levels I, II and III, respectively. The treatment was well tolerated. Toxicity was less frequent and severe at level I. Overall median survival was 33 weeks (95% CI 28–40). Descriptive quality of life analysis showed that patients with a worse baseline global health status score tended to drop out of the study earlier than those with a better score. Gem Vin is feasible at different doses. It is sufficiently active and well tolerated. A phase III study to compare the effect on quality of life of Gem Vin (level I) vs cisplatin-based chemotherapy is ongoing. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2363528 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2000 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-23635282009-09-10 Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study of three different doses Gridelli, C Frontini, L Perrone, F Gallo, C Gulisano, M Cigolari, S Castiglione, F Robbiati, S F Gasparini, G Ianniello, G P Farris, A Locatelli, M C Felletti, R Piazza, E Br J Cancer Regular Article Our aim was to study the activity and toxicity of the gemcitabine plus vinorelbine (Gem Vin) combination and to identify the optimal dose. Previously untreated patients aged < 70 years, with stage IV or IIIb (not candidates for radiotherapy) non-small cell lung cancer were eligible. Studied dose-levels of Gem Vin, administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks, were (mg m(–2)): level I = 1000/25; level II = 1200/25; level III = 1000/30; level IV = 1200/30. A feasibility study was performed at each dose-level, followed by a single-stage phase II study. Dose-level IV was unfeasible because of grade 4 neutropenia. Overall, out of 126 patients enrolled in phase II studies, there were one complete and 32 partial responses (response rate 26%: 95% CI 18–34%). Response rates were 27.9%, 21.4% and 29.3% at levels I, II and III, respectively. The treatment was well tolerated. Toxicity was less frequent and severe at level I. Overall median survival was 33 weeks (95% CI 28–40). Descriptive quality of life analysis showed that patients with a worse baseline global health status score tended to drop out of the study earlier than those with a better score. Gem Vin is feasible at different doses. It is sufficiently active and well tolerated. A phase III study to compare the effect on quality of life of Gem Vin (level I) vs cisplatin-based chemotherapy is ongoing. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign Nature Publishing Group 2000-09 2000-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC2363528/ /pubmed/10952772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1341 Text en Copyright © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Regular Article Gridelli, C Frontini, L Perrone, F Gallo, C Gulisano, M Cigolari, S Castiglione, F Robbiati, S F Gasparini, G Ianniello, G P Farris, A Locatelli, M C Felletti, R Piazza, E Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study of three different doses |
title | Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study of three different doses |
title_full | Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study of three different doses |
title_fullStr | Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study of three different doses |
title_full_unstemmed | Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study of three different doses |
title_short | Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study of three different doses |
title_sort | gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase ii study of three different doses |
topic | Regular Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2363528/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10952772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1341 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gridellic gemcitabineplusvinorelbineinadvancednonsmallcelllungcanceraphaseiistudyofthreedifferentdoses AT frontinil gemcitabineplusvinorelbineinadvancednonsmallcelllungcanceraphaseiistudyofthreedifferentdoses AT perronef gemcitabineplusvinorelbineinadvancednonsmallcelllungcanceraphaseiistudyofthreedifferentdoses AT galloc gemcitabineplusvinorelbineinadvancednonsmallcelllungcanceraphaseiistudyofthreedifferentdoses AT gulisanom gemcitabineplusvinorelbineinadvancednonsmallcelllungcanceraphaseiistudyofthreedifferentdoses AT cigolaris gemcitabineplusvinorelbineinadvancednonsmallcelllungcanceraphaseiistudyofthreedifferentdoses AT castiglionef gemcitabineplusvinorelbineinadvancednonsmallcelllungcanceraphaseiistudyofthreedifferentdoses AT robbiatisf gemcitabineplusvinorelbineinadvancednonsmallcelllungcanceraphaseiistudyofthreedifferentdoses AT gasparinig gemcitabineplusvinorelbineinadvancednonsmallcelllungcanceraphaseiistudyofthreedifferentdoses AT ianniellogp gemcitabineplusvinorelbineinadvancednonsmallcelllungcanceraphaseiistudyofthreedifferentdoses AT farrisa gemcitabineplusvinorelbineinadvancednonsmallcelllungcanceraphaseiistudyofthreedifferentdoses AT locatellimc gemcitabineplusvinorelbineinadvancednonsmallcelllungcanceraphaseiistudyofthreedifferentdoses AT fellettir gemcitabineplusvinorelbineinadvancednonsmallcelllungcanceraphaseiistudyofthreedifferentdoses AT piazzae gemcitabineplusvinorelbineinadvancednonsmallcelllungcanceraphaseiistudyofthreedifferentdoses AT gemcitabineplusvinorelbineinadvancednonsmallcelllungcanceraphaseiistudyofthreedifferentdoses AT gemcitabineplusvinorelbineinadvancednonsmallcelllungcanceraphaseiistudyofthreedifferentdoses |