Cargando…

High tumour contamination of leukaphereses in patients with small cell carcinoma of the lung: a comparison of immunocytochemistry and RT-PCR

In small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) tumour cell contamination of leukaphereses is unknown. The present study was performed to define appropriate markers for reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), then to assess the contamination rate of leukaphereses and corresponding bone marrow...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perey, L, Benhattar, J, Peters, R, Jaunin, P, Leyvraz, S
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2001
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2363973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11742493
http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2001.2177
_version_ 1782153838482948096
author Perey, L
Benhattar, J
Peters, R
Jaunin, P
Leyvraz, S
author_facet Perey, L
Benhattar, J
Peters, R
Jaunin, P
Leyvraz, S
author_sort Perey, L
collection PubMed
description In small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) tumour cell contamination of leukaphereses is unknown. The present study was performed to define appropriate markers for reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), then to assess the contamination rate of leukaphereses and corresponding bone marrow samples. Immunocytochemistry (ICC) and RT-PCR methods were also compared. Among the 33 patients included, analyses were performed in 16 who had multiple leukaphereses and 17 who had only bone marrow. Leukapheresis products and bone marrow were analysed by ICC using several specific monoclonal antibodies against neural-cell adhesion molecule (N-CAM), epithelial glycoprotein (EGP-40) and cytokeratins (CK). Samples were also analyzed by RT-PCR for expression for N-CAM, synaptophysin, neuron-specific enolase, chromogranin, cytokeratin-18/-19, CEA, EGP-40, apomucin type 1 (MUC-1) and human endothelial cell-specific molecule (ESM-1). Using ICC staining, contaminating tumour cells were detected in 34% of leukaphereses (27% in patients with limited disease and 43% in those with extensive disease). N-CAM was the most reliable marker for detection of contamination. For RT-PCR, CK-19 and CEA were the only appropriate markers. Positive signal rate in leukaphereses increased to 78% (89% for patients with limited disease and 67% for extensive disease). In bone marrow, both techniques were in agreement whereas in leukaphereses, RT-PCR was better than ICC. A high rate of tumour cell contamination was demonstrated not only in bone marrow but also in leukaphereses from SCLC patients. The most appropriate technique was RT-PCR mainly in patients with limited disease. © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign http://www.bjcancer.com
format Text
id pubmed-2363973
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2001
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23639732009-09-10 High tumour contamination of leukaphereses in patients with small cell carcinoma of the lung: a comparison of immunocytochemistry and RT-PCR Perey, L Benhattar, J Peters, R Jaunin, P Leyvraz, S Br J Cancer Regular Article In small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) tumour cell contamination of leukaphereses is unknown. The present study was performed to define appropriate markers for reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), then to assess the contamination rate of leukaphereses and corresponding bone marrow samples. Immunocytochemistry (ICC) and RT-PCR methods were also compared. Among the 33 patients included, analyses were performed in 16 who had multiple leukaphereses and 17 who had only bone marrow. Leukapheresis products and bone marrow were analysed by ICC using several specific monoclonal antibodies against neural-cell adhesion molecule (N-CAM), epithelial glycoprotein (EGP-40) and cytokeratins (CK). Samples were also analyzed by RT-PCR for expression for N-CAM, synaptophysin, neuron-specific enolase, chromogranin, cytokeratin-18/-19, CEA, EGP-40, apomucin type 1 (MUC-1) and human endothelial cell-specific molecule (ESM-1). Using ICC staining, contaminating tumour cells were detected in 34% of leukaphereses (27% in patients with limited disease and 43% in those with extensive disease). N-CAM was the most reliable marker for detection of contamination. For RT-PCR, CK-19 and CEA were the only appropriate markers. Positive signal rate in leukaphereses increased to 78% (89% for patients with limited disease and 67% for extensive disease). In bone marrow, both techniques were in agreement whereas in leukaphereses, RT-PCR was better than ICC. A high rate of tumour cell contamination was demonstrated not only in bone marrow but also in leukaphereses from SCLC patients. The most appropriate technique was RT-PCR mainly in patients with limited disease. © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign http://www.bjcancer.com Nature Publishing Group 2001-11 /pmc/articles/PMC2363973/ /pubmed/11742493 http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2001.2177 Text en Copyright © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Regular Article
Perey, L
Benhattar, J
Peters, R
Jaunin, P
Leyvraz, S
High tumour contamination of leukaphereses in patients with small cell carcinoma of the lung: a comparison of immunocytochemistry and RT-PCR
title High tumour contamination of leukaphereses in patients with small cell carcinoma of the lung: a comparison of immunocytochemistry and RT-PCR
title_full High tumour contamination of leukaphereses in patients with small cell carcinoma of the lung: a comparison of immunocytochemistry and RT-PCR
title_fullStr High tumour contamination of leukaphereses in patients with small cell carcinoma of the lung: a comparison of immunocytochemistry and RT-PCR
title_full_unstemmed High tumour contamination of leukaphereses in patients with small cell carcinoma of the lung: a comparison of immunocytochemistry and RT-PCR
title_short High tumour contamination of leukaphereses in patients with small cell carcinoma of the lung: a comparison of immunocytochemistry and RT-PCR
title_sort high tumour contamination of leukaphereses in patients with small cell carcinoma of the lung: a comparison of immunocytochemistry and rt-pcr
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2363973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11742493
http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2001.2177
work_keys_str_mv AT pereyl hightumourcontaminationofleukapheresesinpatientswithsmallcellcarcinomaofthelungacomparisonofimmunocytochemistryandrtpcr
AT benhattarj hightumourcontaminationofleukapheresesinpatientswithsmallcellcarcinomaofthelungacomparisonofimmunocytochemistryandrtpcr
AT petersr hightumourcontaminationofleukapheresesinpatientswithsmallcellcarcinomaofthelungacomparisonofimmunocytochemistryandrtpcr
AT jauninp hightumourcontaminationofleukapheresesinpatientswithsmallcellcarcinomaofthelungacomparisonofimmunocytochemistryandrtpcr
AT leyvrazs hightumourcontaminationofleukapheresesinpatientswithsmallcellcarcinomaofthelungacomparisonofimmunocytochemistryandrtpcr