Cargando…

Evaluation of nurse-led follow up for patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy

This study reports results from a randomised controlled trial of nurse-led care and was designed to determine whether nurse-led follow up improved patients morbidity and satisfaction with care in men treated with radical radiotherapy for prostate and bladder cancer. The aim was to compare outcomes i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faithfull, S, Corner, J, Meyer, L, Huddart, R, Dearnaley, D
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2001
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2364007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11747326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2001.2173
_version_ 1782153846775087104
author Faithfull, S
Corner, J
Meyer, L
Huddart, R
Dearnaley, D
author_facet Faithfull, S
Corner, J
Meyer, L
Huddart, R
Dearnaley, D
author_sort Faithfull, S
collection PubMed
description This study reports results from a randomised controlled trial of nurse-led care and was designed to determine whether nurse-led follow up improved patients morbidity and satisfaction with care in men treated with radical radiotherapy for prostate and bladder cancer. The aim was to compare outcomes in terms of toxicity, symptoms experienced, quality of life, satisfaction with care and health care costs, between those receiving nurse-led care and a group receiving standard care. The study population was of men prescribed radical radiotherapy (greater than 60 Gy). Participants completed self-assessment questionnaires for symptoms and quality of life within the first week of radiotherapy treatment, at week 3, 6 and 12 weeks from start of radiotherapy. Satisfaction with clinical care was also assessed at 12 weeks post-treatment. Observer-rated RTOG toxicity scores were recorded pre-treatment, weeks 1, 3, 6 and 12 weeks from start of radiotherapy. The results presented in this paper are on 115 of 132 (87%) of eligible men who agreed to enter the randomised trial. 6 men (4%) refused and 11 (8%) were missed for inclusion in the study. Data were analysed as a comparison at cross-sectional time points and as a general linear model using multiple regression. There was no significant difference in maximum symptom scores over the time of the trial between nurse-led follow-up care and conventional medical care. Differences were seen in scores in the initial self assessment of symptoms (week 1) that may have been as a result of early nursing intervention. Those men who had received nurse-led care were significantly more satisfied (P < 0.002) at 12 weeks and valued the continuity of the service provided. There were also significant (P < 0.001) cost benefits, with a 31% reduction in costs with nurse-led, compared to medically led care. Evidence from this study suggests that a specialist nurse is able to provide safe follow up for men undergoing radiotherapy. The intervention focused on coping with symptoms, and provided continuity of care and telephone support. Further work is required to improve the management of patients during and after radiotherapy. © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign http://www.bjcancer.com
format Text
id pubmed-2364007
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2001
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23640072009-09-10 Evaluation of nurse-led follow up for patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy Faithfull, S Corner, J Meyer, L Huddart, R Dearnaley, D Br J Cancer Regular Article This study reports results from a randomised controlled trial of nurse-led care and was designed to determine whether nurse-led follow up improved patients morbidity and satisfaction with care in men treated with radical radiotherapy for prostate and bladder cancer. The aim was to compare outcomes in terms of toxicity, symptoms experienced, quality of life, satisfaction with care and health care costs, between those receiving nurse-led care and a group receiving standard care. The study population was of men prescribed radical radiotherapy (greater than 60 Gy). Participants completed self-assessment questionnaires for symptoms and quality of life within the first week of radiotherapy treatment, at week 3, 6 and 12 weeks from start of radiotherapy. Satisfaction with clinical care was also assessed at 12 weeks post-treatment. Observer-rated RTOG toxicity scores were recorded pre-treatment, weeks 1, 3, 6 and 12 weeks from start of radiotherapy. The results presented in this paper are on 115 of 132 (87%) of eligible men who agreed to enter the randomised trial. 6 men (4%) refused and 11 (8%) were missed for inclusion in the study. Data were analysed as a comparison at cross-sectional time points and as a general linear model using multiple regression. There was no significant difference in maximum symptom scores over the time of the trial between nurse-led follow-up care and conventional medical care. Differences were seen in scores in the initial self assessment of symptoms (week 1) that may have been as a result of early nursing intervention. Those men who had received nurse-led care were significantly more satisfied (P < 0.002) at 12 weeks and valued the continuity of the service provided. There were also significant (P < 0.001) cost benefits, with a 31% reduction in costs with nurse-led, compared to medically led care. Evidence from this study suggests that a specialist nurse is able to provide safe follow up for men undergoing radiotherapy. The intervention focused on coping with symptoms, and provided continuity of care and telephone support. Further work is required to improve the management of patients during and after radiotherapy. © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign http://www.bjcancer.com Nature Publishing Group 2001-12 /pmc/articles/PMC2364007/ /pubmed/11747326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2001.2173 Text en Copyright © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Regular Article
Faithfull, S
Corner, J
Meyer, L
Huddart, R
Dearnaley, D
Evaluation of nurse-led follow up for patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy
title Evaluation of nurse-led follow up for patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy
title_full Evaluation of nurse-led follow up for patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy
title_fullStr Evaluation of nurse-led follow up for patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of nurse-led follow up for patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy
title_short Evaluation of nurse-led follow up for patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy
title_sort evaluation of nurse-led follow up for patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2364007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11747326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2001.2173
work_keys_str_mv AT faithfulls evaluationofnurseledfollowupforpatientsundergoingpelvicradiotherapy
AT cornerj evaluationofnurseledfollowupforpatientsundergoingpelvicradiotherapy
AT meyerl evaluationofnurseledfollowupforpatientsundergoingpelvicradiotherapy
AT huddartr evaluationofnurseledfollowupforpatientsundergoingpelvicradiotherapy
AT dearnaleyd evaluationofnurseledfollowupforpatientsundergoingpelvicradiotherapy