Cargando…
Solid stress facilitates spheroid formation: potential involvement of hyaluronan
When neoplastic cells grow in confined spaces in vivo, they exert a finite force on the surrounding tissue resulting in the generation of solid stress. By growing multicellular spheroids in agarose gels of defined mechanical properties, we have recently shown that solid stress inhibits the growth of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2002
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2364140/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11953828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600158 |
_version_ | 1782153879407820800 |
---|---|
author | Koike, C McKee, T D Pluen, A Ramanujan, S Burton, K Munn, L L Boucher, Y Jain, R K |
author_facet | Koike, C McKee, T D Pluen, A Ramanujan, S Burton, K Munn, L L Boucher, Y Jain, R K |
author_sort | Koike, C |
collection | PubMed |
description | When neoplastic cells grow in confined spaces in vivo, they exert a finite force on the surrounding tissue resulting in the generation of solid stress. By growing multicellular spheroids in agarose gels of defined mechanical properties, we have recently shown that solid stress inhibits the growth of spheroids and that this growth-inhibiting stress ranges from 45 to 120 mmHg. Here we show that solid stress facilitates the formation of spheroids in the highly metastatic Dunning R3327 rat prostate carcinoma AT3.1 cells, which predominantly do not grow as spheroids in free suspension. The maximum size and the growth rate of the resulting spheroids decreased with increasing stress. Relieving solid stress by enzymatic digestion of gels resulted in gradual loss of spheroidal morphology in 8 days. In contrast, the low metastatic variant AT2.1 cells, which grow as spheroids in free suspension as well as in the gels, maintained their spheroidal morphology even after stress removal. Histological examination revealed that most cells in AT2.1 spheroids are in close apposition whereas a regular matrix separates the cells in the AT3.1 gel spheroids. Staining with the hyaluronan binding protein revealed that the matrix between AT3.1 cells in agarose contained hyaluronan, while AT3.1 cells had negligible or no hyaluronan when grown in free suspension. Hyaluronan was found to be present in both free suspensions and agarose gel spheroids of AT2.1. We suggest that cell–cell adhesion may be adequate for spheroid formation, whereas solid stress may be required to form spheroids when cell–matrix adhesion is predominant. These findings have significant implications for tumour growth, invasion and metastasis. British Journal of Cancer (2002) 86, 947–953. DOI: 10.1038/sj/bjc/6600158 www.bjcancer.com © 2002 Cancer Research UK |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2364140 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2002 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-23641402009-09-10 Solid stress facilitates spheroid formation: potential involvement of hyaluronan Koike, C McKee, T D Pluen, A Ramanujan, S Burton, K Munn, L L Boucher, Y Jain, R K Br J Cancer Experimental Therapeutics When neoplastic cells grow in confined spaces in vivo, they exert a finite force on the surrounding tissue resulting in the generation of solid stress. By growing multicellular spheroids in agarose gels of defined mechanical properties, we have recently shown that solid stress inhibits the growth of spheroids and that this growth-inhibiting stress ranges from 45 to 120 mmHg. Here we show that solid stress facilitates the formation of spheroids in the highly metastatic Dunning R3327 rat prostate carcinoma AT3.1 cells, which predominantly do not grow as spheroids in free suspension. The maximum size and the growth rate of the resulting spheroids decreased with increasing stress. Relieving solid stress by enzymatic digestion of gels resulted in gradual loss of spheroidal morphology in 8 days. In contrast, the low metastatic variant AT2.1 cells, which grow as spheroids in free suspension as well as in the gels, maintained their spheroidal morphology even after stress removal. Histological examination revealed that most cells in AT2.1 spheroids are in close apposition whereas a regular matrix separates the cells in the AT3.1 gel spheroids. Staining with the hyaluronan binding protein revealed that the matrix between AT3.1 cells in agarose contained hyaluronan, while AT3.1 cells had negligible or no hyaluronan when grown in free suspension. Hyaluronan was found to be present in both free suspensions and agarose gel spheroids of AT2.1. We suggest that cell–cell adhesion may be adequate for spheroid formation, whereas solid stress may be required to form spheroids when cell–matrix adhesion is predominant. These findings have significant implications for tumour growth, invasion and metastasis. British Journal of Cancer (2002) 86, 947–953. DOI: 10.1038/sj/bjc/6600158 www.bjcancer.com © 2002 Cancer Research UK Nature Publishing Group 2002-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC2364140/ /pubmed/11953828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600158 Text en Copyright © 2002 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Experimental Therapeutics Koike, C McKee, T D Pluen, A Ramanujan, S Burton, K Munn, L L Boucher, Y Jain, R K Solid stress facilitates spheroid formation: potential involvement of hyaluronan |
title | Solid stress facilitates spheroid formation: potential involvement of hyaluronan |
title_full | Solid stress facilitates spheroid formation: potential involvement of hyaluronan |
title_fullStr | Solid stress facilitates spheroid formation: potential involvement of hyaluronan |
title_full_unstemmed | Solid stress facilitates spheroid formation: potential involvement of hyaluronan |
title_short | Solid stress facilitates spheroid formation: potential involvement of hyaluronan |
title_sort | solid stress facilitates spheroid formation: potential involvement of hyaluronan |
topic | Experimental Therapeutics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2364140/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11953828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600158 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT koikec solidstressfacilitatesspheroidformationpotentialinvolvementofhyaluronan AT mckeetd solidstressfacilitatesspheroidformationpotentialinvolvementofhyaluronan AT pluena solidstressfacilitatesspheroidformationpotentialinvolvementofhyaluronan AT ramanujans solidstressfacilitatesspheroidformationpotentialinvolvementofhyaluronan AT burtonk solidstressfacilitatesspheroidformationpotentialinvolvementofhyaluronan AT munnll solidstressfacilitatesspheroidformationpotentialinvolvementofhyaluronan AT bouchery solidstressfacilitatesspheroidformationpotentialinvolvementofhyaluronan AT jainrk solidstressfacilitatesspheroidformationpotentialinvolvementofhyaluronan |