Cargando…

Does training increase the use of more emotionally laden words by nurses when talking with cancer patients? A randomised study

The emotional content of health care professionals–cancer patient communication is often considered as poor and has to be improved by an enhancement of health care professionals empathy. One hundred and fifteen oncology nurses participating in a communication skills training workshop were assessed a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Razavi, D, Delvaux, N, Marchal, S, Durieux, J-F, Farvacques, C, Dubus, L, Hogenraad, R
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2002
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2364281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12085247
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600412
_version_ 1782153915508195328
author Razavi, D
Delvaux, N
Marchal, S
Durieux, J-F
Farvacques, C
Dubus, L
Hogenraad, R
author_facet Razavi, D
Delvaux, N
Marchal, S
Durieux, J-F
Farvacques, C
Dubus, L
Hogenraad, R
author_sort Razavi, D
collection PubMed
description The emotional content of health care professionals–cancer patient communication is often considered as poor and has to be improved by an enhancement of health care professionals empathy. One hundred and fifteen oncology nurses participating in a communication skills training workshop were assessed at three different periods. Nurses randomly allocated to a control group arm (waiting list) were assessed a first time and then 3 and 6 months later. Nurses allocated to the training group were assessed before training workshop, just after and 3 months later. Each nurse completed a 20-min clinical and simulated interview. Each interview was analysed by three content analysis systems: two computer-supported content analysis of emotional words, the Harvard Third Psychosocial Dictionary and the Martindale Regressive Imagery Dictionary and an observer rating system of utterances emotional depth level, the Cancer Research Campaign Workshop Evaluation Manual. The results show that in clinical interviews there is an increased use of emotional words by health care professionals right after having been trained (P=0.056): training group subjects use 4.3 (std: 3.7) emotional words per 1000 used before training workshop, and 7.0 (std: 5.8) right after training workshop and 5.9 (std: 4.3) 3 months later compared to control group subjects which use 4.5 (std: 4.8) emotional words at the first assessment point, 4.3 (std: 4.1) at the second and 4.4 (std: 3.3) at the third. The same trend is noticeable for emotional words used by health care professionals in simulated interviews (P=0.000). The emotional words registry used by health care professionals however remains stable over time in clinical interviews (P=0.141) and is enlarged in simulated interviews (P=0.041). This increased use of emotional words by trained health care professionals facilitates cancer patient emotion words expressions compared to untrained health care professionals especially 3 months after training (P=0.005). This study shows that health care professionals empathy may be improved by communication skills training workshop and that this improvement facilitates cancer patients emotions expression. British Journal of Cancer (2002) 87, 1–7. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6600412 www.bjcancer.com © 2002 Cancer Research UK
format Text
id pubmed-2364281
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2002
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23642812009-09-10 Does training increase the use of more emotionally laden words by nurses when talking with cancer patients? A randomised study Razavi, D Delvaux, N Marchal, S Durieux, J-F Farvacques, C Dubus, L Hogenraad, R Br J Cancer Clinical The emotional content of health care professionals–cancer patient communication is often considered as poor and has to be improved by an enhancement of health care professionals empathy. One hundred and fifteen oncology nurses participating in a communication skills training workshop were assessed at three different periods. Nurses randomly allocated to a control group arm (waiting list) were assessed a first time and then 3 and 6 months later. Nurses allocated to the training group were assessed before training workshop, just after and 3 months later. Each nurse completed a 20-min clinical and simulated interview. Each interview was analysed by three content analysis systems: two computer-supported content analysis of emotional words, the Harvard Third Psychosocial Dictionary and the Martindale Regressive Imagery Dictionary and an observer rating system of utterances emotional depth level, the Cancer Research Campaign Workshop Evaluation Manual. The results show that in clinical interviews there is an increased use of emotional words by health care professionals right after having been trained (P=0.056): training group subjects use 4.3 (std: 3.7) emotional words per 1000 used before training workshop, and 7.0 (std: 5.8) right after training workshop and 5.9 (std: 4.3) 3 months later compared to control group subjects which use 4.5 (std: 4.8) emotional words at the first assessment point, 4.3 (std: 4.1) at the second and 4.4 (std: 3.3) at the third. The same trend is noticeable for emotional words used by health care professionals in simulated interviews (P=0.000). The emotional words registry used by health care professionals however remains stable over time in clinical interviews (P=0.141) and is enlarged in simulated interviews (P=0.041). This increased use of emotional words by trained health care professionals facilitates cancer patient emotion words expressions compared to untrained health care professionals especially 3 months after training (P=0.005). This study shows that health care professionals empathy may be improved by communication skills training workshop and that this improvement facilitates cancer patients emotions expression. British Journal of Cancer (2002) 87, 1–7. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6600412 www.bjcancer.com © 2002 Cancer Research UK Nature Publishing Group 2002-07-01 2002-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC2364281/ /pubmed/12085247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600412 Text en Copyright © 2002 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical
Razavi, D
Delvaux, N
Marchal, S
Durieux, J-F
Farvacques, C
Dubus, L
Hogenraad, R
Does training increase the use of more emotionally laden words by nurses when talking with cancer patients? A randomised study
title Does training increase the use of more emotionally laden words by nurses when talking with cancer patients? A randomised study
title_full Does training increase the use of more emotionally laden words by nurses when talking with cancer patients? A randomised study
title_fullStr Does training increase the use of more emotionally laden words by nurses when talking with cancer patients? A randomised study
title_full_unstemmed Does training increase the use of more emotionally laden words by nurses when talking with cancer patients? A randomised study
title_short Does training increase the use of more emotionally laden words by nurses when talking with cancer patients? A randomised study
title_sort does training increase the use of more emotionally laden words by nurses when talking with cancer patients? a randomised study
topic Clinical
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2364281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12085247
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6600412
work_keys_str_mv AT razavid doestrainingincreasetheuseofmoreemotionallyladenwordsbynurseswhentalkingwithcancerpatientsarandomisedstudy
AT delvauxn doestrainingincreasetheuseofmoreemotionallyladenwordsbynurseswhentalkingwithcancerpatientsarandomisedstudy
AT marchals doestrainingincreasetheuseofmoreemotionallyladenwordsbynurseswhentalkingwithcancerpatientsarandomisedstudy
AT durieuxjf doestrainingincreasetheuseofmoreemotionallyladenwordsbynurseswhentalkingwithcancerpatientsarandomisedstudy
AT farvacquesc doestrainingincreasetheuseofmoreemotionallyladenwordsbynurseswhentalkingwithcancerpatientsarandomisedstudy
AT dubusl doestrainingincreasetheuseofmoreemotionallyladenwordsbynurseswhentalkingwithcancerpatientsarandomisedstudy
AT hogenraadr doestrainingincreasetheuseofmoreemotionallyladenwordsbynurseswhentalkingwithcancerpatientsarandomisedstudy