Cargando…

Rapid Polymerase Chain Reaction–Based Test for the Detection of Female Urogenital Chlamydial Infections

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the Amplicor Chlamydia trachomatis Test (Roche Molecular Systems, Branchburg, NJ), a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based technique, as a screening test for the detection of female urogenital C. trachomatis infections, comparing it to an enzyme i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wiesenfeld, Harold C., Uhrin, Michael, Dixon, Bruce W., Sweet, Richard L.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 1994
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2364337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18475342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1064744994000050
_version_ 1782153929131294720
author Wiesenfeld, Harold C.
Uhrin, Michael
Dixon, Bruce W.
Sweet, Richard L.
author_facet Wiesenfeld, Harold C.
Uhrin, Michael
Dixon, Bruce W.
Sweet, Richard L.
author_sort Wiesenfeld, Harold C.
collection PubMed
description Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the Amplicor Chlamydia trachomatis Test (Roche Molecular Systems, Branchburg, NJ), a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based technique, as a screening test for the detection of female urogenital C. trachomatis infections, comparing it to an enzyme immunoassay method. Methods: Endocervical specimens for PCR and Chlamydiazyme (Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL) analysis were obtained from 328 unselected patients at the outpatient Sexually Transmitted Diseases Clinic at the Allegheny County Health Department, Pittsburgh, PA. In addition, urethral swabs for PCR analysis were obtained from 256 of these patients. Results: By PCR analysis, the prevalence of urogenital chlamydial infections was 15.6% and that of cervical chlamydial infections was 10.7%. The sensitivity of PCR in the detection of endocervical chlamydial infections was 89.7% and the specificity was 100%. The positive and negative predictive values of PCR were 100% and 99%, respectively. The sensitivity of Chlamydiazyme in the detection of cervical infections was 61.5% and the specificity was 99.7%, with a positive predictive value of 96.0%. Among all patients with urogenital chlamydial infections, concomitant infections in the urethra and cervix occurred in 52.5%, whereas the urthra or cervix was solely infected in 35.0% and 12.5%, respectively. Conclusions: This PCR-based technique is a rapid screening tool for the diagnosis of urogenital chlamydial infections and is more sensitive than Chlamydiazyme for endocervical infections in a sexually transmitted disease clinic population.
format Text
id pubmed-2364337
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1994
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23643372008-05-12 Rapid Polymerase Chain Reaction–Based Test for the Detection of Female Urogenital Chlamydial Infections Wiesenfeld, Harold C. Uhrin, Michael Dixon, Bruce W. Sweet, Richard L. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol Research Article Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the Amplicor Chlamydia trachomatis Test (Roche Molecular Systems, Branchburg, NJ), a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based technique, as a screening test for the detection of female urogenital C. trachomatis infections, comparing it to an enzyme immunoassay method. Methods: Endocervical specimens for PCR and Chlamydiazyme (Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL) analysis were obtained from 328 unselected patients at the outpatient Sexually Transmitted Diseases Clinic at the Allegheny County Health Department, Pittsburgh, PA. In addition, urethral swabs for PCR analysis were obtained from 256 of these patients. Results: By PCR analysis, the prevalence of urogenital chlamydial infections was 15.6% and that of cervical chlamydial infections was 10.7%. The sensitivity of PCR in the detection of endocervical chlamydial infections was 89.7% and the specificity was 100%. The positive and negative predictive values of PCR were 100% and 99%, respectively. The sensitivity of Chlamydiazyme in the detection of cervical infections was 61.5% and the specificity was 99.7%, with a positive predictive value of 96.0%. Among all patients with urogenital chlamydial infections, concomitant infections in the urethra and cervix occurred in 52.5%, whereas the urthra or cervix was solely infected in 35.0% and 12.5%, respectively. Conclusions: This PCR-based technique is a rapid screening tool for the diagnosis of urogenital chlamydial infections and is more sensitive than Chlamydiazyme for endocervical infections in a sexually transmitted disease clinic population. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 1994 /pmc/articles/PMC2364337/ /pubmed/18475342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1064744994000050 Text en Copyright © 1994 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wiesenfeld, Harold C.
Uhrin, Michael
Dixon, Bruce W.
Sweet, Richard L.
Rapid Polymerase Chain Reaction–Based Test for the Detection of Female Urogenital Chlamydial Infections
title Rapid Polymerase Chain Reaction–Based Test for the Detection of Female Urogenital Chlamydial Infections
title_full Rapid Polymerase Chain Reaction–Based Test for the Detection of Female Urogenital Chlamydial Infections
title_fullStr Rapid Polymerase Chain Reaction–Based Test for the Detection of Female Urogenital Chlamydial Infections
title_full_unstemmed Rapid Polymerase Chain Reaction–Based Test for the Detection of Female Urogenital Chlamydial Infections
title_short Rapid Polymerase Chain Reaction–Based Test for the Detection of Female Urogenital Chlamydial Infections
title_sort rapid polymerase chain reaction–based test for the detection of female urogenital chlamydial infections
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2364337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18475342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1064744994000050
work_keys_str_mv AT wiesenfeldharoldc rapidpolymerasechainreactionbasedtestforthedetectionoffemaleurogenitalchlamydialinfections
AT uhrinmichael rapidpolymerasechainreactionbasedtestforthedetectionoffemaleurogenitalchlamydialinfections
AT dixonbrucew rapidpolymerasechainreactionbasedtestforthedetectionoffemaleurogenitalchlamydialinfections
AT sweetrichardl rapidpolymerasechainreactionbasedtestforthedetectionoffemaleurogenitalchlamydialinfections