Cargando…

Retrospective Analysis of the Serologic Response to the Treatment of Syphilis During Pregnancy

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of several maternal variables on the serologic response following the treatment of syphilis in pregnancy. Methods: A 5-year chart review identified 95 patients coded with syphilis at Hermann Hospital. Inclusion criteria were 1) serologica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Galan, Henry L., Montalvo, Juan F., Deaver, John
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 1997
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2364528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18476130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1064744997000070
_version_ 1782153975984816128
author Galan, Henry L.
Montalvo, Juan F.
Deaver, John
author_facet Galan, Henry L.
Montalvo, Juan F.
Deaver, John
author_sort Galan, Henry L.
collection PubMed
description Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of several maternal variables on the serologic response following the treatment of syphilis in pregnancy. Methods: A 5-year chart review identified 95 patients coded with syphilis at Hermann Hospital. Inclusion criteria were 1) serologically confirmed syphilis infection during the index pregnancy, 2) complete treatment during the index pregnancy, and 3) minimum of one follow-up rapid plasma reagin (RPR) titer. Forty-nine of 95 patients met the inclusion criteria. Treatment response was evaluated by comparing each post-treatment titer of a patient to her pretreatment titer. Each comparison was considered an “observation.” Each observation was classified as either a positive response (≥4-fold titer decline) or a negative response (<4-fold titer decline). Maternal variables assessed included 1) prior history of syphilis untreated or incompletely treated prior to the index pregnancy, 2) gestational age, 3) titer level, 4) unknown duration, 5) positive response at 1 month, 6) positive response at 2 months, 7) positive response at >3 months, and 8) race. Results: A positive response following treatment was significantly more likely if there was no prior history of syphilis or if there was a high initial RPR titer (>32). Only 33/54 (61%) observations at or greater than 3 months had a positive response. Conclusions: Our study suggests that an absence of a history of syphilis and an initial high RPR titer are predictive of a positive response following appropriate treatment. Given the low percentage of observations with a positive response at 3 months, we speculate that we may be undertreating our pregnant patients with syphilis infection.
format Text
id pubmed-2364528
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1997
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23645282008-05-12 Retrospective Analysis of the Serologic Response to the Treatment of Syphilis During Pregnancy Galan, Henry L. Montalvo, Juan F. Deaver, John Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol Research Article Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of several maternal variables on the serologic response following the treatment of syphilis in pregnancy. Methods: A 5-year chart review identified 95 patients coded with syphilis at Hermann Hospital. Inclusion criteria were 1) serologically confirmed syphilis infection during the index pregnancy, 2) complete treatment during the index pregnancy, and 3) minimum of one follow-up rapid plasma reagin (RPR) titer. Forty-nine of 95 patients met the inclusion criteria. Treatment response was evaluated by comparing each post-treatment titer of a patient to her pretreatment titer. Each comparison was considered an “observation.” Each observation was classified as either a positive response (≥4-fold titer decline) or a negative response (<4-fold titer decline). Maternal variables assessed included 1) prior history of syphilis untreated or incompletely treated prior to the index pregnancy, 2) gestational age, 3) titer level, 4) unknown duration, 5) positive response at 1 month, 6) positive response at 2 months, 7) positive response at >3 months, and 8) race. Results: A positive response following treatment was significantly more likely if there was no prior history of syphilis or if there was a high initial RPR titer (>32). Only 33/54 (61%) observations at or greater than 3 months had a positive response. Conclusions: Our study suggests that an absence of a history of syphilis and an initial high RPR titer are predictive of a positive response following appropriate treatment. Given the low percentage of observations with a positive response at 3 months, we speculate that we may be undertreating our pregnant patients with syphilis infection. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 1997 /pmc/articles/PMC2364528/ /pubmed/18476130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1064744997000070 Text en Copyright © 1997 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Galan, Henry L.
Montalvo, Juan F.
Deaver, John
Retrospective Analysis of the Serologic Response to the Treatment of Syphilis During Pregnancy
title Retrospective Analysis of the Serologic Response to the Treatment of Syphilis During Pregnancy
title_full Retrospective Analysis of the Serologic Response to the Treatment of Syphilis During Pregnancy
title_fullStr Retrospective Analysis of the Serologic Response to the Treatment of Syphilis During Pregnancy
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective Analysis of the Serologic Response to the Treatment of Syphilis During Pregnancy
title_short Retrospective Analysis of the Serologic Response to the Treatment of Syphilis During Pregnancy
title_sort retrospective analysis of the serologic response to the treatment of syphilis during pregnancy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2364528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18476130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1064744997000070
work_keys_str_mv AT galanhenryl retrospectiveanalysisoftheserologicresponsetothetreatmentofsyphilisduringpregnancy
AT montalvojuanf retrospectiveanalysisoftheserologicresponsetothetreatmentofsyphilisduringpregnancy
AT deaverjohn retrospectiveanalysisoftheserologicresponsetothetreatmentofsyphilisduringpregnancy