Cargando…

Chlorhexidine Vs. Sterile Vaginal Wash During Labor to Prevent Neonatal Infection

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine if a dilute solution of chlorhexidine used as a one-time vaginal wash intrapartum can reduce the use of postnatal antibiotics and neonatal infection. Methods: Term pregnant women in labor were prospectively randomized to receive either 20 cc of 0...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eriksen, Nancy L., Sweeten, Keri M., Blanco, Jorge D.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 1997
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2364551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18476153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1064744997000495
_version_ 1782153981852647424
author Eriksen, Nancy L.
Sweeten, Keri M.
Blanco, Jorge D.
author_facet Eriksen, Nancy L.
Sweeten, Keri M.
Blanco, Jorge D.
author_sort Eriksen, Nancy L.
collection PubMed
description Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine if a dilute solution of chlorhexidine used as a one-time vaginal wash intrapartum can reduce the use of postnatal antibiotics and neonatal infection. Methods: Term pregnant women in labor were prospectively randomized to receive either 20 cc of 0.4% chlorhexidine (n = 481) or 20 cc of sterile water (n = 466) placebo. Exclusion criteria included fetal distress, clinical infection, cervical dilatation >6 cm, and known allergy to chlorhexidine. Outcome variables included the incidence of neonatal pneumonia, culture proven neonatal sepsis, and use of the antibiotics in the neonate. Continuous variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test and discrete variables were compared with the chi-square test. Results: The length of ruptured membranes (mean ± S.D.) between the chlorhexidine group (408 ± 589 min) and control group (352 ± 318 min) was not significantly different (P = 0.85, 95% confidence interval 354–462). Fifteen neonates (3.2%) in the chlorhexidine group and 9 (1.9%) in the control group received antibiotics in the postnatal period (P = 0.32, 95% confidence interval 0.72–3.72). There was one case of pneumonia in the control group and no cases of sepsis in either group. Conclusions: A one-time chlorhexidine vaginal wash does not decrease the use of antibiotics or incidence of neonatal infection in our population.
format Text
id pubmed-2364551
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1997
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23645512008-05-12 Chlorhexidine Vs. Sterile Vaginal Wash During Labor to Prevent Neonatal Infection Eriksen, Nancy L. Sweeten, Keri M. Blanco, Jorge D. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol Research Article Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine if a dilute solution of chlorhexidine used as a one-time vaginal wash intrapartum can reduce the use of postnatal antibiotics and neonatal infection. Methods: Term pregnant women in labor were prospectively randomized to receive either 20 cc of 0.4% chlorhexidine (n = 481) or 20 cc of sterile water (n = 466) placebo. Exclusion criteria included fetal distress, clinical infection, cervical dilatation >6 cm, and known allergy to chlorhexidine. Outcome variables included the incidence of neonatal pneumonia, culture proven neonatal sepsis, and use of the antibiotics in the neonate. Continuous variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test and discrete variables were compared with the chi-square test. Results: The length of ruptured membranes (mean ± S.D.) between the chlorhexidine group (408 ± 589 min) and control group (352 ± 318 min) was not significantly different (P = 0.85, 95% confidence interval 354–462). Fifteen neonates (3.2%) in the chlorhexidine group and 9 (1.9%) in the control group received antibiotics in the postnatal period (P = 0.32, 95% confidence interval 0.72–3.72). There was one case of pneumonia in the control group and no cases of sepsis in either group. Conclusions: A one-time chlorhexidine vaginal wash does not decrease the use of antibiotics or incidence of neonatal infection in our population. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 1997 /pmc/articles/PMC2364551/ /pubmed/18476153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1064744997000495 Text en Copyright © 1997 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Eriksen, Nancy L.
Sweeten, Keri M.
Blanco, Jorge D.
Chlorhexidine Vs. Sterile Vaginal Wash During Labor to Prevent Neonatal Infection
title Chlorhexidine Vs. Sterile Vaginal Wash During Labor to Prevent Neonatal Infection
title_full Chlorhexidine Vs. Sterile Vaginal Wash During Labor to Prevent Neonatal Infection
title_fullStr Chlorhexidine Vs. Sterile Vaginal Wash During Labor to Prevent Neonatal Infection
title_full_unstemmed Chlorhexidine Vs. Sterile Vaginal Wash During Labor to Prevent Neonatal Infection
title_short Chlorhexidine Vs. Sterile Vaginal Wash During Labor to Prevent Neonatal Infection
title_sort chlorhexidine vs. sterile vaginal wash during labor to prevent neonatal infection
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2364551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18476153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1064744997000495
work_keys_str_mv AT eriksennancyl chlorhexidinevssterilevaginalwashduringlabortopreventneonatalinfection
AT sweetenkerim chlorhexidinevssterilevaginalwashduringlabortopreventneonatalinfection
AT blancojorged chlorhexidinevssterilevaginalwashduringlabortopreventneonatalinfection