Cargando…

Cefotetan Susceptibility Testing Against Anaerobic Bacteria From Obstetrical and Gynecologic Sources: Comparison of Five Different Methods

Five different antibiotic susceptibility methods were utilized to test the effectiveness of cefotetan against 200 anaerobic bacteria recovered from patients with obstetrical or gynecological infections. The object of this study was to determine if a more economical and rapid method for anaerobic sus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maccato, Maurizio, Riddle, Gerald, Faro, Sebastian
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 1993
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2364666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18476201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1064744993000067
_version_ 1782154004571095040
author Maccato, Maurizio
Riddle, Gerald
Faro, Sebastian
author_facet Maccato, Maurizio
Riddle, Gerald
Faro, Sebastian
author_sort Maccato, Maurizio
collection PubMed
description Five different antibiotic susceptibility methods were utilized to test the effectiveness of cefotetan against 200 anaerobic bacteria recovered from patients with obstetrical or gynecological infections. The object of this study was to determine if a more economical and rapid method for anaerobic susceptibility testing was as acceptable as the reference agar dilution method. The five methods were: 1) broth disk elution, 2) microbroth technique, 3) a commercially available microbroth technique, 4) a commercially available spiral gradient technique, and 5) reference agar dilution. The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) calculated from the spiral gradient technique were equal to or within one doubling dilution of the reference system in 99.5% of cases, while the percentage for the commercially available microbroth system was 96.8%, very similar to the microbroth technique used in our laboratory that yielded a percentage of 96.3. The disk elution method correlated to the reference agar dilution method in 95.3% cases. While the overall agreement between these techniques is good, especially for the spiral gradient system, clustering of certain organisms near the breakpoint of the antibiotic tested results in variability in the labeling of these organisms as susceptible or resistant. This problem appears to be particularly significant for the disk elution method. Therefore, further refinements in these methods of suscleptibility testing are needed in order to provide a more clinically useful assessment of the susceptibility or resistance of certain bacterial isolates.
format Text
id pubmed-2364666
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1993
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23646662008-05-12 Cefotetan Susceptibility Testing Against Anaerobic Bacteria From Obstetrical and Gynecologic Sources: Comparison of Five Different Methods Maccato, Maurizio Riddle, Gerald Faro, Sebastian Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol Research Article Five different antibiotic susceptibility methods were utilized to test the effectiveness of cefotetan against 200 anaerobic bacteria recovered from patients with obstetrical or gynecological infections. The object of this study was to determine if a more economical and rapid method for anaerobic susceptibility testing was as acceptable as the reference agar dilution method. The five methods were: 1) broth disk elution, 2) microbroth technique, 3) a commercially available microbroth technique, 4) a commercially available spiral gradient technique, and 5) reference agar dilution. The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) calculated from the spiral gradient technique were equal to or within one doubling dilution of the reference system in 99.5% of cases, while the percentage for the commercially available microbroth system was 96.8%, very similar to the microbroth technique used in our laboratory that yielded a percentage of 96.3. The disk elution method correlated to the reference agar dilution method in 95.3% cases. While the overall agreement between these techniques is good, especially for the spiral gradient system, clustering of certain organisms near the breakpoint of the antibiotic tested results in variability in the labeling of these organisms as susceptible or resistant. This problem appears to be particularly significant for the disk elution method. Therefore, further refinements in these methods of suscleptibility testing are needed in order to provide a more clinically useful assessment of the susceptibility or resistance of certain bacterial isolates. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 1993 /pmc/articles/PMC2364666/ /pubmed/18476201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1064744993000067 Text en Copyright © 1993 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Maccato, Maurizio
Riddle, Gerald
Faro, Sebastian
Cefotetan Susceptibility Testing Against Anaerobic Bacteria From Obstetrical and Gynecologic Sources: Comparison of Five Different Methods
title Cefotetan Susceptibility Testing Against Anaerobic Bacteria From Obstetrical and Gynecologic Sources: Comparison of Five Different Methods
title_full Cefotetan Susceptibility Testing Against Anaerobic Bacteria From Obstetrical and Gynecologic Sources: Comparison of Five Different Methods
title_fullStr Cefotetan Susceptibility Testing Against Anaerobic Bacteria From Obstetrical and Gynecologic Sources: Comparison of Five Different Methods
title_full_unstemmed Cefotetan Susceptibility Testing Against Anaerobic Bacteria From Obstetrical and Gynecologic Sources: Comparison of Five Different Methods
title_short Cefotetan Susceptibility Testing Against Anaerobic Bacteria From Obstetrical and Gynecologic Sources: Comparison of Five Different Methods
title_sort cefotetan susceptibility testing against anaerobic bacteria from obstetrical and gynecologic sources: comparison of five different methods
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2364666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18476201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1064744993000067
work_keys_str_mv AT maccatomaurizio cefotetansusceptibilitytestingagainstanaerobicbacteriafromobstetricalandgynecologicsourcescomparisonoffivedifferentmethods
AT riddlegerald cefotetansusceptibilitytestingagainstanaerobicbacteriafromobstetricalandgynecologicsourcescomparisonoffivedifferentmethods
AT farosebastian cefotetansusceptibilitytestingagainstanaerobicbacteriafromobstetricalandgynecologicsourcescomparisonoffivedifferentmethods