Cargando…

In Vitro Susceptibility Testing of Clinical Isolates of Chlamydia trachomatis

Penicillin class antibiotics have demonstrated varying degrees of in vivo and in vitro success when tested against Chlamydia trachomatis. The activity of ampicillin-sulbactam, an agent commonly utilized in the treatment of pelvic infections, was tested to ascertain if any antichlamydial activity is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martens, Mark G., Faro, Sebastian, Maccato, Maurizio, Riddle, Gerald, Hammill, Hunter, Wang, Y.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 1993
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2364677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18476205
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1064744993000109
_version_ 1782154007182049280
author Martens, Mark G.
Faro, Sebastian
Maccato, Maurizio
Riddle, Gerald
Hammill, Hunter
Wang, Y.
author_facet Martens, Mark G.
Faro, Sebastian
Maccato, Maurizio
Riddle, Gerald
Hammill, Hunter
Wang, Y.
author_sort Martens, Mark G.
collection PubMed
description Penicillin class antibiotics have demonstrated varying degrees of in vivo and in vitro success when tested against Chlamydia trachomatis. The activity of ampicillin-sulbactam, an agent commonly utilized in the treatment of pelvic infections, was tested to ascertain if any antichlamydial activity is present. Up to six endocervical isolates of C. trachomatis were tested against each of five antibiotics including doxycycline, erythromycin, clindamycin, ampicillin/sulbactam, and sulbactam alone. McCoy cell monolayers were inoculated with high inclusion counts of 10,000–30,000 inclusion-forming units (IFU) per coverslip, and exposed to each antibiotic. Up to nine subsequent antibiotic free culture passes were performed to assess the viability of abnormal inclusions. Doxycycline, erythromycin, and clindamycin achieved 100% eradication of inclusions at concentrations of 4.0, 2.0, and 1.0 µg/mL. Exposure to ampicillin/sulbactam resulted in a greater than 99% reduction in the inclusion count at 32.0 µg/mL, while sulbactam by itself demonstrated considerably less activity. Abnormal inclusions were noted only in the ampicillin/sulbactam exposed cells, and these, plus all inclusions remaining following sublethal exposure to the other antibiotics, resulted in regrowth to control levels in subsequent passes. Doxycycline and erythromycin demonstrated excellent activity. Clindamycin and ampicillin/sulbactam also significantly reduced inclusion formation, and therefore may provide adequate C. trachomatis coverage in patients receiving these antibiotics for pelvic infections.
format Text
id pubmed-2364677
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1993
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23646772008-05-12 In Vitro Susceptibility Testing of Clinical Isolates of Chlamydia trachomatis Martens, Mark G. Faro, Sebastian Maccato, Maurizio Riddle, Gerald Hammill, Hunter Wang, Y. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol Research Article Penicillin class antibiotics have demonstrated varying degrees of in vivo and in vitro success when tested against Chlamydia trachomatis. The activity of ampicillin-sulbactam, an agent commonly utilized in the treatment of pelvic infections, was tested to ascertain if any antichlamydial activity is present. Up to six endocervical isolates of C. trachomatis were tested against each of five antibiotics including doxycycline, erythromycin, clindamycin, ampicillin/sulbactam, and sulbactam alone. McCoy cell monolayers were inoculated with high inclusion counts of 10,000–30,000 inclusion-forming units (IFU) per coverslip, and exposed to each antibiotic. Up to nine subsequent antibiotic free culture passes were performed to assess the viability of abnormal inclusions. Doxycycline, erythromycin, and clindamycin achieved 100% eradication of inclusions at concentrations of 4.0, 2.0, and 1.0 µg/mL. Exposure to ampicillin/sulbactam resulted in a greater than 99% reduction in the inclusion count at 32.0 µg/mL, while sulbactam by itself demonstrated considerably less activity. Abnormal inclusions were noted only in the ampicillin/sulbactam exposed cells, and these, plus all inclusions remaining following sublethal exposure to the other antibiotics, resulted in regrowth to control levels in subsequent passes. Doxycycline and erythromycin demonstrated excellent activity. Clindamycin and ampicillin/sulbactam also significantly reduced inclusion formation, and therefore may provide adequate C. trachomatis coverage in patients receiving these antibiotics for pelvic infections. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 1993 /pmc/articles/PMC2364677/ /pubmed/18476205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1064744993000109 Text en Copyright © 1993 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Martens, Mark G.
Faro, Sebastian
Maccato, Maurizio
Riddle, Gerald
Hammill, Hunter
Wang, Y.
In Vitro Susceptibility Testing of Clinical Isolates of Chlamydia trachomatis
title In Vitro Susceptibility Testing of Clinical Isolates of Chlamydia trachomatis
title_full In Vitro Susceptibility Testing of Clinical Isolates of Chlamydia trachomatis
title_fullStr In Vitro Susceptibility Testing of Clinical Isolates of Chlamydia trachomatis
title_full_unstemmed In Vitro Susceptibility Testing of Clinical Isolates of Chlamydia trachomatis
title_short In Vitro Susceptibility Testing of Clinical Isolates of Chlamydia trachomatis
title_sort in vitro susceptibility testing of clinical isolates of chlamydia trachomatis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2364677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18476205
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1064744993000109
work_keys_str_mv AT martensmarkg invitrosusceptibilitytestingofclinicalisolatesofchlamydiatrachomatis
AT farosebastian invitrosusceptibilitytestingofclinicalisolatesofchlamydiatrachomatis
AT maccatomaurizio invitrosusceptibilitytestingofclinicalisolatesofchlamydiatrachomatis
AT riddlegerald invitrosusceptibilitytestingofclinicalisolatesofchlamydiatrachomatis
AT hammillhunter invitrosusceptibilitytestingofclinicalisolatesofchlamydiatrachomatis
AT wangy invitrosusceptibilitytestingofclinicalisolatesofchlamydiatrachomatis