Cargando…
Abdominal Wound Problems After Hysterectomy With Electrocautery vs. Scalpel Subcutaneous Incision
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between postoperative abdominal incision problems and opening subcutaneous tissues with electrocautery or scalpel. Women scheduled for elective abdominal hysterectomy who gave informed consent were randomly assigned to subcutaneous abdominal...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
1993
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2364680/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18476202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1064744993000079 |
_version_ | 1782154007894032384 |
---|---|
author | Hemsell, David L. Hemsell, Patricia G. Nobles, Brenda Johnson, Edward R. Little, Bertis B. Heard, Molly |
author_facet | Hemsell, David L. Hemsell, Patricia G. Nobles, Brenda Johnson, Edward R. Little, Bertis B. Heard, Molly |
author_sort | Hemsell, David L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between postoperative abdominal incision problems and opening subcutaneous tissues with electrocautery or scalpel. Women scheduled for elective abdominal hysterectomy who gave informed consent were randomly assigned to subcutaneous abdominal wall tissue incision by electrocautery or scalpel. Postoperative abdominal wound problem diagnoses included seroma, hematoma, infection, or dehiscence without identifiable etiology. Fifteen of 380 women (3.9%) developed a wound problem; six had scalpel and nine had electrosurgical subcutaneous incisions (P = 0.4). Thicker subcutaneous tissues (P = 0.04) and concurrent pelvic infection (P < 0.001) were significant risk factors for postoperative wound problems. Only two women (0.5%) developed an infection. We conclude that the method of subcutaneous tissue incision was unrelated to the development of postoperative abdominal incision problems in 380 women undergoing elective abdominal hysterectomy. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-2364680 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1993 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-23646802008-05-12 Abdominal Wound Problems After Hysterectomy With Electrocautery vs. Scalpel Subcutaneous Incision Hemsell, David L. Hemsell, Patricia G. Nobles, Brenda Johnson, Edward R. Little, Bertis B. Heard, Molly Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol Research Article The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between postoperative abdominal incision problems and opening subcutaneous tissues with electrocautery or scalpel. Women scheduled for elective abdominal hysterectomy who gave informed consent were randomly assigned to subcutaneous abdominal wall tissue incision by electrocautery or scalpel. Postoperative abdominal wound problem diagnoses included seroma, hematoma, infection, or dehiscence without identifiable etiology. Fifteen of 380 women (3.9%) developed a wound problem; six had scalpel and nine had electrosurgical subcutaneous incisions (P = 0.4). Thicker subcutaneous tissues (P = 0.04) and concurrent pelvic infection (P < 0.001) were significant risk factors for postoperative wound problems. Only two women (0.5%) developed an infection. We conclude that the method of subcutaneous tissue incision was unrelated to the development of postoperative abdominal incision problems in 380 women undergoing elective abdominal hysterectomy. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 1993 /pmc/articles/PMC2364680/ /pubmed/18476202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1064744993000079 Text en Copyright © 1993 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hemsell, David L. Hemsell, Patricia G. Nobles, Brenda Johnson, Edward R. Little, Bertis B. Heard, Molly Abdominal Wound Problems After Hysterectomy With Electrocautery vs. Scalpel Subcutaneous Incision |
title | Abdominal Wound Problems After Hysterectomy With
Electrocautery vs. Scalpel Subcutaneous Incision |
title_full | Abdominal Wound Problems After Hysterectomy With
Electrocautery vs. Scalpel Subcutaneous Incision |
title_fullStr | Abdominal Wound Problems After Hysterectomy With
Electrocautery vs. Scalpel Subcutaneous Incision |
title_full_unstemmed | Abdominal Wound Problems After Hysterectomy With
Electrocautery vs. Scalpel Subcutaneous Incision |
title_short | Abdominal Wound Problems After Hysterectomy With
Electrocautery vs. Scalpel Subcutaneous Incision |
title_sort | abdominal wound problems after hysterectomy with
electrocautery vs. scalpel subcutaneous incision |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2364680/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18476202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1064744993000079 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hemselldavidl abdominalwoundproblemsafterhysterectomywithelectrocauteryvsscalpelsubcutaneousincision AT hemsellpatriciag abdominalwoundproblemsafterhysterectomywithelectrocauteryvsscalpelsubcutaneousincision AT noblesbrenda abdominalwoundproblemsafterhysterectomywithelectrocauteryvsscalpelsubcutaneousincision AT johnsonedwardr abdominalwoundproblemsafterhysterectomywithelectrocauteryvsscalpelsubcutaneousincision AT littlebertisb abdominalwoundproblemsafterhysterectomywithelectrocauteryvsscalpelsubcutaneousincision AT heardmolly abdominalwoundproblemsafterhysterectomywithelectrocauteryvsscalpelsubcutaneousincision |