Cargando…

Abdominal Wound Problems After Hysterectomy With Electrocautery vs. Scalpel Subcutaneous Incision

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between postoperative abdominal incision problems and opening subcutaneous tissues with electrocautery or scalpel. Women scheduled for elective abdominal hysterectomy who gave informed consent were randomly assigned to subcutaneous abdominal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hemsell, David L., Hemsell, Patricia G., Nobles, Brenda, Johnson, Edward R., Little, Bertis B., Heard, Molly
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 1993
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2364680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18476202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1064744993000079
_version_ 1782154007894032384
author Hemsell, David L.
Hemsell, Patricia G.
Nobles, Brenda
Johnson, Edward R.
Little, Bertis B.
Heard, Molly
author_facet Hemsell, David L.
Hemsell, Patricia G.
Nobles, Brenda
Johnson, Edward R.
Little, Bertis B.
Heard, Molly
author_sort Hemsell, David L.
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between postoperative abdominal incision problems and opening subcutaneous tissues with electrocautery or scalpel. Women scheduled for elective abdominal hysterectomy who gave informed consent were randomly assigned to subcutaneous abdominal wall tissue incision by electrocautery or scalpel. Postoperative abdominal wound problem diagnoses included seroma, hematoma, infection, or dehiscence without identifiable etiology. Fifteen of 380 women (3.9%) developed a wound problem; six had scalpel and nine had electrosurgical subcutaneous incisions (P = 0.4). Thicker subcutaneous tissues (P = 0.04) and concurrent pelvic infection (P < 0.001) were significant risk factors for postoperative wound problems. Only two women (0.5%) developed an infection. We conclude that the method of subcutaneous tissue incision was unrelated to the development of postoperative abdominal incision problems in 380 women undergoing elective abdominal hysterectomy.
format Text
id pubmed-2364680
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1993
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23646802008-05-12 Abdominal Wound Problems After Hysterectomy With Electrocautery vs. Scalpel Subcutaneous Incision Hemsell, David L. Hemsell, Patricia G. Nobles, Brenda Johnson, Edward R. Little, Bertis B. Heard, Molly Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol Research Article The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between postoperative abdominal incision problems and opening subcutaneous tissues with electrocautery or scalpel. Women scheduled for elective abdominal hysterectomy who gave informed consent were randomly assigned to subcutaneous abdominal wall tissue incision by electrocautery or scalpel. Postoperative abdominal wound problem diagnoses included seroma, hematoma, infection, or dehiscence without identifiable etiology. Fifteen of 380 women (3.9%) developed a wound problem; six had scalpel and nine had electrosurgical subcutaneous incisions (P = 0.4). Thicker subcutaneous tissues (P = 0.04) and concurrent pelvic infection (P < 0.001) were significant risk factors for postoperative wound problems. Only two women (0.5%) developed an infection. We conclude that the method of subcutaneous tissue incision was unrelated to the development of postoperative abdominal incision problems in 380 women undergoing elective abdominal hysterectomy. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 1993 /pmc/articles/PMC2364680/ /pubmed/18476202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1064744993000079 Text en Copyright © 1993 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hemsell, David L.
Hemsell, Patricia G.
Nobles, Brenda
Johnson, Edward R.
Little, Bertis B.
Heard, Molly
Abdominal Wound Problems After Hysterectomy With Electrocautery vs. Scalpel Subcutaneous Incision
title Abdominal Wound Problems After Hysterectomy With Electrocautery vs. Scalpel Subcutaneous Incision
title_full Abdominal Wound Problems After Hysterectomy With Electrocautery vs. Scalpel Subcutaneous Incision
title_fullStr Abdominal Wound Problems After Hysterectomy With Electrocautery vs. Scalpel Subcutaneous Incision
title_full_unstemmed Abdominal Wound Problems After Hysterectomy With Electrocautery vs. Scalpel Subcutaneous Incision
title_short Abdominal Wound Problems After Hysterectomy With Electrocautery vs. Scalpel Subcutaneous Incision
title_sort abdominal wound problems after hysterectomy with electrocautery vs. scalpel subcutaneous incision
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2364680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18476202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1064744993000079
work_keys_str_mv AT hemselldavidl abdominalwoundproblemsafterhysterectomywithelectrocauteryvsscalpelsubcutaneousincision
AT hemsellpatriciag abdominalwoundproblemsafterhysterectomywithelectrocauteryvsscalpelsubcutaneousincision
AT noblesbrenda abdominalwoundproblemsafterhysterectomywithelectrocauteryvsscalpelsubcutaneousincision
AT johnsonedwardr abdominalwoundproblemsafterhysterectomywithelectrocauteryvsscalpelsubcutaneousincision
AT littlebertisb abdominalwoundproblemsafterhysterectomywithelectrocauteryvsscalpelsubcutaneousincision
AT heardmolly abdominalwoundproblemsafterhysterectomywithelectrocauteryvsscalpelsubcutaneousincision