Cargando…

Intrauterine Pressure Catheter in Labor: Associated Microbiology

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine if bacterial growth occurred in the amniotic fluid of laboring women. Twenty patients who required an intrauterine pressure catheter (IUPC) during labor were studied. Amniotic fluid samples were aspirated during labor and at the time of delivery....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pinell, Phillip, Faro, Sebastian, Roberts, Scott, Le, Sy, Maccato, Maurizio, Hammill, Hunter
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 1993
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2364682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18476210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1064744993000158
_version_ 1782154008353308672
author Pinell, Phillip
Faro, Sebastian
Roberts, Scott
Le, Sy
Maccato, Maurizio
Hammill, Hunter
author_facet Pinell, Phillip
Faro, Sebastian
Roberts, Scott
Le, Sy
Maccato, Maurizio
Hammill, Hunter
author_sort Pinell, Phillip
collection PubMed
description Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine if bacterial growth occurred in the amniotic fluid of laboring women. Twenty patients who required an intrauterine pressure catheter (IUPC) during labor were studied. Amniotic fluid samples were aspirated during labor and at the time of delivery. Methods: IUPCs were placed in laboring patients for a variety of reasons. Cervical cultures were taken prior to insertion of an IUPC. After the IUPC was placed, amniotic fluid cultures were taken both at the time of placement and 30 minutes prior to delivery. These cultures were sent for aerobic, anaerobic, Mycoplasma, and Ureaplasma cultures. Results: The increase in bacterial concentration from the initial sample to the final sample was statistically significant (P < 0.01) for both aerobes and anaerobes. Amniotic fluid samples demonstrated a median of 0 bacterial species per patient on initial collection and 2 bacterial species per patient in final collection. The mean count of cfu for erobes in the initial amniotic samples was 3.5 × 10(4), compared to that of the second samples, which was 1.4 × 10(5). The mean count of cfu for anaerobes in the initial amniotic fluid samples,.was 4.1 × 10(2), compared to that of the second samples, which was 8.0 × 10(3). Only 3 of 20 patients developed chorioamnionitis, with only 1 patient having an increased number ofbacterial species significantly higher than the median. Although 80% of patients had a colony count ≥ 10(2) cfu/cc, only 19% of this group developed chorioamnionitis. Conclusions: The number of bacterial species and colony counts increased significantly during labor, but this factor alone was not enough to cause chorioamnionitis in a significant number of patients.
format Text
id pubmed-2364682
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1993
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-23646822008-05-12 Intrauterine Pressure Catheter in Labor: Associated Microbiology Pinell, Phillip Faro, Sebastian Roberts, Scott Le, Sy Maccato, Maurizio Hammill, Hunter Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol Research Article Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine if bacterial growth occurred in the amniotic fluid of laboring women. Twenty patients who required an intrauterine pressure catheter (IUPC) during labor were studied. Amniotic fluid samples were aspirated during labor and at the time of delivery. Methods: IUPCs were placed in laboring patients for a variety of reasons. Cervical cultures were taken prior to insertion of an IUPC. After the IUPC was placed, amniotic fluid cultures were taken both at the time of placement and 30 minutes prior to delivery. These cultures were sent for aerobic, anaerobic, Mycoplasma, and Ureaplasma cultures. Results: The increase in bacterial concentration from the initial sample to the final sample was statistically significant (P < 0.01) for both aerobes and anaerobes. Amniotic fluid samples demonstrated a median of 0 bacterial species per patient on initial collection and 2 bacterial species per patient in final collection. The mean count of cfu for erobes in the initial amniotic samples was 3.5 × 10(4), compared to that of the second samples, which was 1.4 × 10(5). The mean count of cfu for anaerobes in the initial amniotic fluid samples,.was 4.1 × 10(2), compared to that of the second samples, which was 8.0 × 10(3). Only 3 of 20 patients developed chorioamnionitis, with only 1 patient having an increased number ofbacterial species significantly higher than the median. Although 80% of patients had a colony count ≥ 10(2) cfu/cc, only 19% of this group developed chorioamnionitis. Conclusions: The number of bacterial species and colony counts increased significantly during labor, but this factor alone was not enough to cause chorioamnionitis in a significant number of patients. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 1993 /pmc/articles/PMC2364682/ /pubmed/18476210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1064744993000158 Text en Copyright © 1993 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pinell, Phillip
Faro, Sebastian
Roberts, Scott
Le, Sy
Maccato, Maurizio
Hammill, Hunter
Intrauterine Pressure Catheter in Labor: Associated Microbiology
title Intrauterine Pressure Catheter in Labor: Associated Microbiology
title_full Intrauterine Pressure Catheter in Labor: Associated Microbiology
title_fullStr Intrauterine Pressure Catheter in Labor: Associated Microbiology
title_full_unstemmed Intrauterine Pressure Catheter in Labor: Associated Microbiology
title_short Intrauterine Pressure Catheter in Labor: Associated Microbiology
title_sort intrauterine pressure catheter in labor: associated microbiology
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2364682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18476210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1064744993000158
work_keys_str_mv AT pinellphillip intrauterinepressurecatheterinlaborassociatedmicrobiology
AT farosebastian intrauterinepressurecatheterinlaborassociatedmicrobiology
AT robertsscott intrauterinepressurecatheterinlaborassociatedmicrobiology
AT lesy intrauterinepressurecatheterinlaborassociatedmicrobiology
AT maccatomaurizio intrauterinepressurecatheterinlaborassociatedmicrobiology
AT hammillhunter intrauterinepressurecatheterinlaborassociatedmicrobiology